Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Report: Bush Planned Iraqi Invasion Pre-Sept. 11

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
thebaghwan Donating Member (998 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 02:02 PM
Original message
Report: Bush Planned Iraqi Invasion Pre-Sept. 11
Now isn't this interesting????

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=578&e=3&u=/nm/20040110/ts_nm/people_oneill_dc

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Former Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill charges in a new book that President Bush (news - web sites) entered office in January 2001 intent on invading Iraq (news - web sites) and was in search of a way to go about it.

O'Neill, fired in December 2002 as part of a shake-up of Bush's economic team, has become the first major insider of the Bush administration to launch an attack on the president.

He likened Bush at Cabinet meetings to "a blind man in a room full of deaf people," according to excerpts from a CBS interview to promote a book by former Wall Street Journal reporter Ron Suskind, "The Price of Loyalty."

To go to war, Bush used the argument that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction and had to be stopped in the post-Sept. 11, 2001, world. The weapons have never been found.

"From the very beginning, there was a conviction that Saddam Hussein (news - web sites) was a bad person and that he needed to go," O'Neill said in the "60 Minutes" interview scheduled to air on Sunday. "For me, the notion of pre-emption, that the U.S. has the unilateral right to do whatever we decide to do, is a really huge leap."

CBS released excerpts from the interview on Friday and Saturday.

The former treasury secretary and other White House insiders gave Suskind documents that in the first three months of 2001 revealed the Bush administration was examining military options for removing Saddam Hussein, CBS said.

"There are memos," Suskind told CBS. "One of them marked 'secret' says 'Plan for Post-Saddam Iraq."'

Another Pentagon (news - web sites) document entitled "Foreign suitors for Iraqi Oil Field Contracts" talks about contractors from 40 countries and which ones have interest in Iraq, Suskind said.

BENT ON WAR

O'Neill was also quoted in the book as saying the president was determined to find a reason to go to war and he was surprised nobody on the National Security Council questioned why Iraq should be invaded.

"It was all about finding a way to do it. That was the tone of it," said O'Neill. "The president saying 'Go find me a way to do this."'

White House spokesman Scott McClellan rejected O'Neill's remarks.

"We appreciate his service. While we're not in the business of doing book reviews, it appears that the world according to Mr. O'Neill is more about trying to justify his own opinions than looking at the reality of the results we are achieving on behalf of the American people," he said on Saturday.

O'Neill also said the president did not ask him a single question during their first one-on-one meeting, which lasted an hour. The president's lack of engagement left his advisers with "little more than hunches about what the president might think," O'Neil told "60 Minutes."

Suskind's book, whose full title is "The Price of Loyalty: George W. Bush, the White House, and the Education of Paul O'Neill," uses interviews with O'Neill, dozens of White House insiders and 19,000 documents provided by O'Neill.

O'Neill, who was fired due to disagreements over tax cuts, spent a difficult two years in Washington, joining the Bush administration with a background as a no-nonsense corporate executive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ChavezSpeakstheTruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. Isn't it convenient
I love how they're only defense is to call their critics "crazy". Those fucking dicks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. Anybody who bothered to read PNAC knwos this
but the fact that he has the goods is a good thing

Now lets see if this informaiton sinks in
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. Wow! Gadzooks! Yoy! Folks, this is hot stuff.
I always said, Paul Oneill calls it like he sees it. You may disagree with his policies, but the guy is clear about what he says. Plus he backs it up with data. Its about time. How will the media deal with this? A: Just don't say anything about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madaboutharry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
4. The White House has already
tipped its hat as far as the response. They are taking what could be called the "Martha Mitchell" offensive and label him a crazy wacko.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CalProf Donating Member (219 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. They'll have a little trouble
with that strategy, since apparently Secretary O'Neill took lots and lots of documents with him when he left.

I do think CBS should have issued this stuff on Thursday, instead of Friday afternoon when there is little attention being paid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Yes, but Suskind said there were memos...
with specific titles. I am assuming he wouldn't put that into print without either copies, or a second source to corroborate the first.

But then, the world I learned to know is transformed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. the memos
are on the Judicial Watch website that discusses Cheney's energy task force documents, and shows us a few. The .pdf files (a pair of them) on that page are titled exactly what the memo O'neill referenced was titled.

I think we now have a good idea just what Cheney's task force was about and why he's keeping it so secret. This is a conspiracy, folks- a criminal conspiracy; a textbook example of why and for what crimes conspiracy statues exist. It's a criminal act of beyond colossal proportions.

Oh, and take a look at page 51, paragraph one, of the PNAC document Rebuilding America's Defenses. Pay special attention to the reference to a moder Pearl Harbor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
5. Yer Honor, we have a witness (O'Neill)
NOW may we impeach GW Bush? How bout a trial?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
6. The cbs link:
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/01/09/60minutes/main592330.shtml

Well, this will be a test of how good the Dumbya's teflon coating is.
Does this generate the need for RWLIHOP = Ready and Waiting to Let It Happen On Purpose?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jogi1969 Donating Member (139 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
7. the 60 min
interview will be interesting;
just how much will the CBS overlords
allow trashing of * and his staff?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbaraann Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
8. Comments are being posted to this story like crazy.
(Post/Read Messages at the bottom of the story.)

Also, don't forget to rate this story!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
missile_bender Donating Member (193 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
11. I see McClellan did not deny the information
just slammed O'Neil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KayLaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Personally
I could barely understand was McClellan said. It sounded like a bunch of weasly garbage to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hell Hath No Fury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
13. Every DUer should be on the phone...
Edited on Sat Jan-10-04 02:52 PM by Hell Hath No Fury
on Monday to their representatives demanding an investigation, and calling their media outlets demanding they cover this story.

Good god folks, we have been handed a stick to beat GW with -- we MUST use it, and use it until the guy is bloody.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
15. Duplicate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC