Source:
Houston Chronicle Austin BureauBP's Texas City refinery — in a possible revolving-door violation of state law — hired a state engineer in 2003 who had spent the previous two years processing its application for a new air quality permit.
. . .
Lawyers representing people injured in the March 23, 2005, explosion at the plant contend that Herrera's job switch from state regulator to company advocate was part of an effort to obtain a new air quality permit for the plant without having to upgrade safety equipment that caused the blast.
BP and the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality say the state's revolving-door law was not violated because there was a series of permit applications and Herrera did not work on the one that ultimately resulted in a new permit being issued. BP also denies misleading the commission in getting the permit.
. . .
The plaintiffs' attorneys are arguing that BP obtained its operating permit through fraud by misleading the TCEQ about the plant's safety features and by hiring state regulator Herrera to promote the company's application, and they have implied in depositions that a signing bonus he received might have constituted bribery by the company.
Read more:
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/front/5326659.html