Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

US Plans Case Against AP Photographer

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Eugene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-19-07 04:38 PM
Original message
US Plans Case Against AP Photographer
Source: Associated Press

US Plans Case Against AP Photographer

Monday November 19, 2007 9:16 PM

By BRIAN MURPHY

Associated Press Writer

NEW YORK (AP) - The U.S. military plans to seek a
criminal case in an Iraqi court against an award-winning
Associated Press photographer but is refusing to disclose
what evidence or accusations would be presented.

An AP attorney on Monday strongly protested the decision,
calling the U.S. military plans a “sham of due process.”
The journalist, Bilal Hussein, has already been imprisoned
without charges for more than 19 months.

A public affairs officer notified the AP on Sunday that
the military intends to submit a written complaint against
Hussein that would bring the case into the Iraqi justice
system as early as Nov. 29. Under Iraqi codes, an
investigative magistrate will decide whether there are
grounds to try Hussein, 36, who was seized in the western
Iraqi city of Ramadi on April 12, 2006.

Dave Tomlin, associate general counsel for the AP, said
the defense for Hussein is being forced to work “totally
in the dark.”

-snip-

Read more: http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,,-7088934,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
God23 Donating Member (200 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-19-07 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. What a shining example of freedom....
Not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-19-07 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. The defense walks into court not even knowing what the charges will be
and have to immediately put up a defense of their client based on what they hear in court that day.

How is this justice? What if the military states in court that the defense should not be allowed to even hear the charges because of "state secrets"?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lord Wortherington Donating Member (174 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-19-07 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. Public affairs read: Psychological Operations
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mainer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-19-07 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
4. They hate us for our freedoms
"They" being the Pentagon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-19-07 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
5. Well, whaddaya want? Look at the last name, after all!!!
Let the Wheel of Justice spin,

Bring the guilty bastard in!!


Of COURSE he's guilty in BushCo World!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rockybelt Donating Member (938 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-19-07 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
6. I
wonder what the hell he took a picture of? Whatever it was it must be damning and he must have the negative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuffleClaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-19-07 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
7. a pulitzer prize winning journalist being crucified for daring to show the truth
that is it in a nutshell. 'case' my foot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohio2007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-19-07 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. pulitzer prize for pix. I kinda understand why the US wants to talk to him about 2005 stories
not the best of sourcse but from wikipedia;


The Jamil Hussein controversy refers to an allegation by conservative bloggers, including Michelle Malkin, that a massacre the Associated Press reported had never happened, and that their source, Jamil Hussein, did not exist.

The AP reported that four mosques in the Hurriya neighborhood of Baghdad had been 'burned and blew up' and that six Sunnis had been dragged out of prayers and burnt alive.<1> They attributed this claim to "Jamil Hussein", saying he was a captain in the Iraqi police.

The Multi-National Force - Iraq claimed that an "an Iraqi Army patrol investigating the area found only one mosque had been burned in the neighborhood" and "was also unable to confirm media reports that six Sunni civilians were allegedly dragged out of Friday prayers and burned to death."<2>.

Malkin has apologised for denying Capt. Husseins existence<3> but contests AP claims of destroyed mosques and civilians burned alive. Malkin visited Iraq and determined that several of the mosques reported destroyed were still intact. She further noted that the AP's only corroborating witness has recanted and that no-one since has found any evidence of the claim about people being burned alive.<4>



snip

Was Hussein reliable as sole source for earliest version of this story?


snip
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jamil_Hussein_controversy#Jamil_Hussein

Did his undisclosed sources put him up to spinning their truth?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
badgervan Donating Member (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-19-07 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Looks Like....
... your friendly college wingers have been busy on Wikipedia. Wonder just how historically challenged that site is these days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohio2007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-20-07 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. from an Italian website
Edited on Tue Nov-20-07 09:54 PM by ohio2007
wikipedia is hacked by "everybody" but history is there if you dig Google


The pic was pinched from this article where credit given to the AP stringer Bilal Hussein ;


Santoro ucciso. La compagna: l'ho riconosciuto

......

Suleiman Yammin. Altra certezza: a scattare le foto è stato il fotoreporter iracheno,

Bilal Hussein,
lo stesso fra l'altro che mercoledì dichiarò di aver

www.corriere.it/Primo_Piano/Esteri/2004/12_Dicembre/16/santoro.shtml

scroll down the link and check out Bilal's photo gallery



or if you prefer, you can use the phrase I believe they call

.....Fake ..but accurate.... ? ;)



(Ap/Bilal Hussein)

http://www.corriere.it/av/galleria.html?2004/dicembre/rapito&1



ciao





...Gee, I wonder what ever happened to his Fallujah, class of '04, posse ?
where are they now?


lol

eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superconnected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-19-07 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
8. Imprisoned without charges for 19 months, and the U.S. is going
Edited on Mon Nov-19-07 06:54 PM by superconnected
to prosecute but refuse to say why.

Yep, I'm afraid. The US constitution has been taken over by American Terrorists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-19-07 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
9. They Already Brought Back the Crusades and the Inquisition, Now the Star Chamber
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
otherlander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-19-07 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
10. Good luck, Bilal.
I don't know what he did, but it sounds like he must have tried to show the world something important enough to hide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-20-07 07:24 AM
Response to Original message
13. We haven't heard from Reporters Without Borders on this case, or any of the other many, many cases
of obvious Bush administration abuse of journalists. Why is that?

I hope they're not letting the fact they are funded by the U.S. get in the road of their duty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-20-07 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
14. Kangaroo courts and secret evidence
I thought we were supposed to be against that in the United States. But if you object to this travesty, you're just a "Bush hater," shrill and hysterical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Progressive Friend Donating Member (362 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-20-07 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
16. So much for "freedom of the press" and "freedom of speech"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC