Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. Military Deaths in Iraq at 3,850

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-03-07 09:49 PM
Original message
U.S. Military Deaths in Iraq at 3,850
Source: Associated Press

U.S. Military Deaths in Iraq at 3,850
By The Associated Press – 3 hours ago

As of Saturday, Nov. 3, 2007, at least 3,850 members of the U.S. military have died since the beginning of the Iraq war in March 2003, according to an Associated Press count. The figure includes eight military civilians. At least 3,131 died as a result of hostile action, according to the military's numbers.

The AP count is 10 higher than the Defense Department's tally, last updated Friday at 10 a.m. EDT.

The British military has reported 171 deaths; Italy, 33; Ukraine, 18; Poland, 21; Bulgaria, 13; Spain, 11; Denmark, seven; El Salvador, five; Slovakia, four; Latvia, three; Estonia, Netherlands, Thailand, Romania, two each; and Australia, Hungary, Kazakhstan, South Korea, one death each.

The latest deaths reported by the military:
- A soldier was killed Thursday by an explosive south of Baghdad.
- A soldier died Saturday in an non-combat related explosion in Salahuddin province.

Read more: http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5gqgQCcv26kB1dkgZRZNHmbn_1J8gD8SMGB700


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Islander Expat Donating Member (180 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-03-07 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think these are only the people that have died in Iraq, not counting..
those they lose after being medivaced out of the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frogcycle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-03-07 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. wrong
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-04-07 01:06 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. False
It's everybody, including people wounded in Iraq who died months later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Islander Expat Donating Member (180 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-04-07 04:23 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. How do you know that?
You counted em all?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-04-07 08:09 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. I know
1) Many of the listed KIA's died outside the country. This debunks your initial claim.
2) You have no evidence to the contrary, and nobody else does either. Merely stating "This administration would do anything!" is not evidence, by the way.
3) Enough about the world to find the idea of hidden KIA's in an information age dubious at best.

That's all I need to know. You made a claim and you were wrong about it. You have no evidence to prove your claim, and there is plenty of evidence to prove your claim wrong. It's not really that complicated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-04-07 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Amen.
There's way too much information out there for a casualty to be kept off the books. The only way that they can be "hidden" is playing games with the numbers, delaying the release of information, and trying not to mention the number of wounded--now residing at just shy of 30,000, not including non-hostile injuries and illnesses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Islander Expat Donating Member (180 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-04-07 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. You sure trust the government's figures
you're such a trusting soul.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-04-07 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Is that your counter-argument?
Because it is lacking in anything resembling evidence. I do understand why you would resort to stupid ad hominem arguments when you lack evidence, but that doesn't make it any less pathetic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoGodsNoMasters Donating Member (257 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-03-07 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. This reminds me of a quotation...
Forget who said it first, something like "How many soldiers is the president willing to sacrifice on the altar of his ego?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Islander Expat Donating Member (180 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-04-07 04:21 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. delete
Edited on Sun Nov-04-07 04:22 AM by Islander Expat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rockybelt Donating Member (938 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-04-07 01:15 AM
Response to Original message
5. How much
How much blood can the hands of George W. Bush and Richard Cheney hold?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SleeplessinSoCal Donating Member (710 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-04-07 01:21 AM
Response to Original message
6. 3,870 according to globalsecurity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-04-07 08:05 AM
Response to Original message
9. Send in the Chickenhawks and
bring our troops home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Progressive Friend Donating Member (362 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-04-07 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
14. These numbers do not include US "contractor" (i.e. mercenary) deaths
The US government said last spring that there were 225 deaths in that category. However, the companies involved are not required to release any information, so we only know that 225 was the very minimum last spring.

That means that the actual number of US deaths in Iraq is well over 4,000. This is never mentioned in the corporate media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Progressive Friend Donating Member (362 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-04-07 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
15. BTW, in October of 2007 there were still more US fatalities than in seven other months of the war
I point this out, because the pro-war propagandists are trying to claim that "we're winning", simply because there was a relatively "low" month in terms of US fatalities. However, there have occasionally been many other "low" months, so it means nothing.

Source: http://icasualties.org/oif
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 01:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC