Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

White House admits Bush lied about Iraqi nukes

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Dirty Hippie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 02:55 PM
Original message
White House admits Bush lied about Iraqi nukes
Edited on Tue Jul-08-03 01:11 PM by OhMyGod

An intelligence consultant who was present at two White House briefings where the uranium report was discussed confirmed that the President was told the intelligence was questionable and that his national security advisors urged him not to include the claim in his State of the Union address.

"The report had already been discredited," said Terrance J. Wilkinson, a CIA advisor present at two White House briefings. "This point was clearly made when the President was in the room during at least two of the briefings."

Bush's response was anger, Wilkinson said.

"He said that if the current operatives working for the CIA couldn't prove the story was true, then the agency had better find some who could," Wilkinson said. "He said he knew the story was true and so would the world after American troops secured the country."

On edit link:

http://www.capitolhillblue.com/artman/publish/article_2518.shtml


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Robin Hood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. SMoking gun if i ever saw one.
Now we know what Bush knew and when e knew it. And the fact that he lied to the world and thousands of people have died because of it.

Not only Bush either, the whole Admin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caledesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. LG - Oh happy day!
Now how are these thugs going to BS their way out of this one? Lie more. We want an investigaton Senator Warner!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robin Hood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #15
25. I hope that they do lie more.
At this point they are so used to it that they don't know any other way. Condi baby lied a month ago on Meet the press."If there was a contradictory report then it must have been buried in the bowels of the CIA. And the whole time that she was answering this, she was real jittery and nervous, because she was throwing her self on the sword for king George.

Oh happy day indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Outvoicer Donating Member (667 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #15
43. they will BS their way out of ...
they always do, with the help of a very complicit media which already is refusing to give this the tone of scandal it deserves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chemenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-03 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #43
103. Not to mention the Republican-Controlled
House and Senate.

Investigation? Impeachment? Fageddabowdet!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-03 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
91. How long will it take the mainstream media to accept that justifications
for pre-emptive war were most likely made in order to have an excuse to implement the longstanding plan and vision (PNAC) of many of this Administration's top military/defense advisors/planners? This ain't rocket science, folks. How long will it be before the mainstream media tell the people the whole story so they can make their own judgment about their elected officials?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-03 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
107. the story was retracted
see below
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
plurality Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. you gotta be shittin' me!
The HAS to get played in the major media, we need to flood their inboxes and phones with this shit! NO WAY this gets shoved under the rug.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jono Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. I saw it on the crawl
on ABC this morning. Here's hoping others pick it up soon!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Caution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. YES! FINALLY!
Looks like the truth shall set us free! There is no way this can be ignored.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. I'm not holding my breath
the whore press will just say that * was mislead by other "inside sources", and move along to another missing child, more conjoined twins, divorcing celebrities or some other diversion. I wish I had hope that this would really develop into something, but plenty of 'smoking guns" have been swept under the rug since * stole the office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BiggJawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-03 07:22 AM
Response to Reply #9
79. That's right, "Not Chimpy's Fault"....
He got bogus info, he was mis-lead, he heard something wrong, he's dyslexic and mis-read the report, yada, yada, yada...

And the Murkan Sheeple won't give a rat's ass because it didn't involve a cum-stained blue dress....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rhiannon12866 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-03 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #9
95. You've nailed it exactly
That's what's going to happen as long as the American media refuse to stand up to this lying administration. I just don't know how these people get up and go to work everyday. What's the point?! I'm assuming that they went into journalism with some kind of enthusiasm for finding and reporting the truth. How can they stomach repeating lie after lie? And if we know the truth, these so-called ``experts,'' who are paid to know exactly what's going on, certainly must. I would love to see these warmongers called on their lies, but the evidence is so overwhelming, and still nothing's happened, so I have little hope.:grr:

btw, I really like your avatar and sig.:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spotbird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
63. Yes there is.
Most of what is being treated as news now was available to the media before the war. If the WH stonewalls this will die also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. thanks for the story
I'm pitching it like crazy--for some reason they want to wait to cover it until it's more developed!

ON IT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhataBildeberger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
5. allow me to add
WOOHOO!!!

Any botanists know how hard it is to transplant a shrub to Federal prison?





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Champion Jack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
6. kickin this one
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adamocrat Donating Member (403 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
7. Wow!
I really hope this story has legs. I'm sending it to everyone I know.

-A
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
study_war_no_more Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. thats show business
You think he was pissed then wait till he hears this.x( :bounce: :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paschall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
11. The next question is...
"He said he knew the story was true..."

How did he know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dirty Hippie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. God probably told him.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rhiannon12866 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-03 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #17
96. LOL!
It's true, he could probably say this and get away with it. I was just saying to my friend that if anybody else said that ``God told them'' to do something, they would most likely be locked up and put on anti-psychotic medication! How does he get away with it?!:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
petersjo Donating Member (192 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
12. Calling our senators and congressmen???
I'd say we should all be calling our respective senators and representatives to give them this link and insist that they must no longer bury their heads in the sand. If Clinton lying about his sex life qualified for impeachment, what does this sort of lying qualify for? Prison? I hope so.

jp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
13. We now know what he knew, and when he knew it
He has been caught completely bare-assed in a lie that started an illegal war, destablized a critically important region, alienated our oldest allies, and will ultimately sink our economy.

NOTE TO DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATES: Your reaction to these revelations will be worth 50% of your final grade.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demobrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
14. I think the thread title is a little misleading.
Reading the article, it doesn't sound like the WH has admitted Jack. I hope this Wilkinson guy doesn't get Baxtered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Caution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #14
26. Look closer...
Edited on Tue Jul-08-03 01:51 PM by Caution
This article clearly states that Bush was told in advance that this information was not credible and should not be included in the State of the Union by his own advisors and intelligence analysts. He personally chose to ignore this and included it anyway. He knew there was no proof and went ahead anyway. He lied to the people of the United States about an unprovoked attack on a foreign government and initiated a war of aggression against them.

Edit to correct myself. I misread your post and assumed you were taking issue with the "lie" characterization. You were clearly taking issue with the characterization that it was the White House itself which made this release. Good point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
umcwb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-03 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #14
101. The title of the article is not "WH admits Bush Lied About Iraqi Nuke
its "White House admits Bush wrong about Iraqi nukes". By no means am I sticking up for Chimpy, just trying to be exact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
16. Oooo! Georgie has a secret source!
We must, WE MUST subpoena Georgie to find out how he knew what the CIA didn't.

Wow. Do you think God told him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #16
32. google "Pentagon Office of Special Plans"
Edited on Tue Jul-08-03 01:56 PM by ElsewheresDaughter
this is the intell agency Bush* created because he didn't like CIA report stating "no iraqi nukes or WMDs"...so he created an intel agency that would fabricate what he wanted...i shit you not!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gottaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #32
48. OSP
Now I had the impression that the Office of Special Plans was Rummy's baby and it is what became of the Office of Strategic Information after that blew up over that whole "Yeah, we're going to lie to the press, who cares?" episode. You got specific links?

Some of mine:

osp
Leo Strass
osp

I've got more Straussian links, but it's too crazy effing paranoid to post here. I mean I can barely wrap my mind around how messed up twisted insane this government is, much less ask others to delve into it.

On the Office of Strategic Info, here's the FAIR Coverage, with links to revealing centcom transcripts.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #48
52. gottaB ...i hear ya...having the same problem here...
trying to wrap this brain around the insanity of bushco*

thanks for the links...:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #48
59. OPS links
www.nynewsday.com/news/nationworld/world/ ny-wocia043315966jun04,0,3888552.story?coll=ny-worldnews-print

http://www.subliminalnews.com/archives/000063.php
www.veteransforpeace.org/Straw_Powell_053103.htm
thisisnotablog.net/archives/000088.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gottaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-03 07:12 AM
Response to Reply #59
78. thanks, more links here on Leo Strauss
I got a message from a DUer whose profile isn't available. He asked for links to the cult around Leo Strauss. The following links come with some provisos. I cannot vouch for the sources. Some of the coverage has come from anti-Semitic groups, like LaRouchies, although the story has been followed up independently. I do not endorse and will not answer for any racist or bigotted asuumptions, conclusions or opinions that you may run across by following these links. I present these tidbits out of a compelling interest to learn about the way influential people in our governent are thinking. That is all.


  • the cabal If that link doesn't work, try something like "neo-conservative ascendancy" in the search pane. Al Khazen's article makes heavy use of Hersch's story, but has additional perspective and material. Al Hayat also has detailed bios of neocons.

  • Leo Strauss A good followup to Hersh's story that uses author Shadia Drury as a source. The focus is intellectual, with the aim of assessing how Strauss's teachings influence the neocons.
    Drury suggests it is ironic, but not inconsistent with Strauss' ideas about the necessity for elites to deceive their citizens, that the Bush administration defends its anti-terrorist campaign by resorting to idealistic rhetoric. "They really have no use for liberalism and democracy, but they're conquering the world in the name of liberalism and democracy," she said.
    The links in the story are worth reading too. Follow them to the "Theatrical Militarism" piece for a wonky good time.

  • leo strauss

  • Struassian homepage Struassian homepage. Check the forums. They seem genuinely perplexed by all the fuss.

  • "synarchism" Larouchies :evilfrown:

  • leo strauss

  • Revelation as political philosophyFrom Claremont Institute, not a happy bunch. If you can connect the dots here, please do yourself a favor, eat some ice cream, enjoy the sun, and be glad these psychotic mofos haven't got your number--yet.

  • Philosopher Kings Gary Leupp's essay for Counterpunch. Good distillation, extremely biased of course, but not in a bad way.

  • neocons:tinfoilhat:














Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TeeYiYi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-03 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #78
85. Wow GottaB . . . your research has me intrigued . . .

. . . I'm bookmarking this thread for the links. Thanks. :hi:

TYY
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jus_the_facts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
18. Yeah yeah blah blah blah.....
....the MEDIA will protect their asses like they always do.....

I'll not get my hopes up in the slightest over a goddamn thing that proves them for what they are...has it made one bit of difference YET...HELL F'ING NO....niether will any of this either....yeah I'm bitterly hopeless and cynical....and with my power of accurate observation...just can't see why these revelations of his guilt makes anyone think it'll make a damn bit of difference...hasn't yet...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NickDanger Donating Member (284 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
19. Post this on Free Republic, someone with posting privs there
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NickDanger Donating Member (284 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #19
38. Freepers responses
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shanti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #38
56. hahahaha!
the freepers are busting arteries trying to spin this story! they are apoplectic!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
study_war_no_more Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-03 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #38
93. clintonista's ??
heheh I prefer the term alternative American.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rhiannon12866 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-03 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #38
97. Why did you make me look at that?
No, it's my own fault. I already know what these benighted apologists are going to say whenever look at that site and I already know that I'm going to feel angry and sick to my stomach. When will I ever learn?!:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
20. Holy Shiite!!! The L word is in the headline!!
hot damn!! This is the first time I have seen it called what it
is...a f***ing LIE!!! Now, lets see if any tv whores have the
cojones to use it tonight on the evening news shows.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemoTex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
21. "Bush's response was anger, Wilkinson said."
"He said that if the current operatives working for the CIA couldn't prove the story was true, then the agency had better find some who could," Wilkinson said. "He said he knew the story was true and so would the world after American troops secured the country."

How did Bu$h know the story was true? GOD TOLD HIM SO! That is the only way!

:scared:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheswick2.0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #21
61. just like he knew he "won" florida
POS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carl21014 Donating Member (522 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
22. Anyone have another source?
I know the first words out of my republican friends will be, "Capitol Hill Blue?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rich Hunt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. We DO need another source
What exactly is the perspective of this "Capitol Hill Blue" site? I saw a whole lot of Clinton-smear stuff on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diplomats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #24
33. That was my thought when I saw it was Capitol Hill Blue
I know they have anti-Clinton stuff but I think they may be more anti-government than anything else. I'd like to see this from another source.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rich Hunt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #33
42. "life, liberty and property"
"Life, liberty and property" (property, as opposed to "the pursuit of happiness") is a libertarian mantra. I think their stance with regard to the Congress is a little hysterical, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FubarFly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #33
58. It's a libertarian site.
Which means they harrangued Clinton, and hate the dems, but absolutely loathe the neo-cons.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drool_n_yank Donating Member (82 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #24
70. WASH POST
I heard this story this morning on Wbai/Democracy Now NYC 9:OO AM surprised is getting here so late.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A23777-2003Jul7.html?nav=hptop_tb
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #70
73. That one's up- This goes beyond it
This has Wilkinson saying Bush KNEW the intel was bad and asked for more. This connects directly to Bush lying. It's different. The Post article just says they know its bad now, but didn't then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #22
27. My thoughts exactly.
that and "Who is Terrance Wilkinson?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eddie Current Donating Member (401 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #27
66. good question
someone over at www.dailykos.com is already doing a lot of googling on that name and not coming up with much.

other posters who seem to be familier with capitalblues pretty much disregard it.

I'm not getting my hopes up any.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiCoup2K4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #22
28. Yeah right...
.... You mean the type of Repukes who think FAUX, Newshax, Drudge, and Mush Limpdick are the only "legitimate" news sources?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carl21014 Donating Member (522 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 01:53 PM
Original message
Those types exactly
We need Reuters, AP, something like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dirty Hippie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #22
29. I googled Google News
Edited on Tue Jul-08-03 01:50 PM by OhMyGod
for "Terrance J. Wilkinson" before I posted and got nothing. Somebody should email Will Pitt and suggest that he interview this guy.

On Edit spellin'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #29
36. google "Pentagon Office of Special Plans"...agency bush created to lie for
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #22
34. I don't know if this source is reliable
Has anyone else interviewed this guy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lfairban Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #22
45. There doesn't seem to be much on this on Google.
Edited on Tue Jul-08-03 02:14 PM by lfairban
I found a couple things searching on "Bush lied":

Stonewalling poses an even greater threat to our principles of government. It matters whether the president lied to the American people. Political fibs are common, not just about with whom presidents have had sex, but also to advance foreign-policy goals. Remember the Tonkin Gulf incident, inaccurate claims of Iraqi troop movements against Saudi Arabia before the first Gulf War, and repetition of false atrocity claims from ethnic Albanian guerrillas during the Kosovo war.

http://www.modbee.com/24hour/opinions/story/937159p-6541204c.html

-- We were told by Bush that there were WMDs in Iraq and that we could not wait until we were nuclear cinders to act; we had to invade and declare war. And we did, based on his "truths." If a person lies in court, nothing else the person says can ever be taken for the truth. Bush lied and Americans died, and continue to die, and he continues to lie. Impeach Bush now.

http://www.helenair.com/articles/2003/07/07/opinions_top/a04070703_01.txt

{on edit}

These operations, I remind you, took place in our name. It was for the safety of the world that Bush and Blair went to war on Iraq, so they say, and that is you and me. And if killings and cock-ups are committed in our name, then we want to know about it. The reason we are told nothing, or lied to with blatant contempt, is that the operations were bungled, therefore they don't want us to know about them.

http://www.counterpunch.org/cloughley07082003.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NickDanger Donating Member (284 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #22
71. Here's what the source has to say about Wilkinson
Edited on Tue Jul-08-03 06:13 PM by NickDanger
(On Edit--the link is bad and can't seem to get it to work. Go to Capital Hill Blue and go to the third page of the relevant Reader Rant)

http://www.capitolhillblue.com/ubb/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic;f=22;t=000700;p=3#000061

You make a lot of assumptions for someone who bases his research on Google. I've known Terry Wilkinson for 20+ years and his decision to go public was a painful one that I'm sure will bring recriminations. But he loves his country a lot more than any political party or politician. I've received some emails today regarding his comments and have forwarded them on to him. It's his decision as to whether or not he wishes to respond.

But I don't feed anyone's desire for a witch hunt. When we ran the stories about Bill Clinton's sexual assaults on women, we identified a number of the women. I don't recall anyone at Free Republican demanding "proof" of their identity although I did have a number of liberal media types hounding me for more information.

I didn't pander to them and I won't to anyone else. I stand by the stories that run on our web site. You are free to read them or not read them, believe them or not believe them. It's a free world. We've been on the web since 1994 and we will be here 10 years from now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trajan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
23. Though I would take issue with the TITLE used .....
I.E. "White House admits Bush Lied about WMD" ....

Aparently, the source is a person who sat in two meetings, which makes him a WITNESS, but not the "White House" ....

The WITNESS admits this, not the administration itself ....

Nevertheless: ... THIS is a BOMBSHELL ! ...... combined with Joe Wilson's reports and the reports of VARIOUS sources in the CIA/DIA universe itself: ... Bush/Cheney's goose COULD be cooked ....

The State of the Union is a constitutional requirement ....

US Constitution: Article 3; Section 2:

"Section 3. He shall from time to time give to the Congress information of the state of the union, and recommend to their consideration such measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient ... "

An officer of government cannot KNOWINGLY provide false evidence to congress, can they ???? .... isnt that perjury ????? ...

Wow ...... Lets compare the GRAVITY of this iniquity, to a soiled blue dress ........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
30. i can smell the burnt powder from here
:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
31. Bush wasn't touched by the memo fiasco, this won't even ruffle his hair
Remember when Bush had to admit he had a memo warning him that someone was about to hijack a plane, and Condi admitted Bush probably never even read the memo? No one cared. No one's watching. When a story falls on the media and there is no Democrat to blame, it makes no sound.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftHander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
35. Who is Wilkinson?
I googled his name and came up blank...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #35
39. "Pentagon Offiuce of Special Plans" ...bush created agency because didn't
like CIA reports on WMDs and need fabrications ...check the dates this office was created
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #35
40. "Pentagon Offiuce of Special Plans" ...bush created agency because didn't
like CIA reports on WMDs and need fabrications ...check the dates this office was created

google "pentagon Office of Special Plans"....smoking gun!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #35
41. "Pentagon Office of Special Plans" bush created agency because he didn't
Edited on Tue Jul-08-03 02:03 PM by ElsewheresDaughter
like CIA reports on WMDs and need fabrications ...check the dates this office was created

google "Pentagon Office of Special Plans"....smoking gun!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-03 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #41
83. You can't repeat that enough !!!!! THE OSP!!!!!!!! THAT is the smoking gun
Exactly. They couldn't get anyone to back up the policy they had decided on years ago (though they did keep quiet as told SEE Dana Milbank NYT article after W's Oct.~5, 2002 speech in Cinci)

SO THEY CREATED THEIR OWN AGENCY TO "SUPPORT" THE DECISION THAT HAD ALREADY BEEN MADE!

SCREAM IT FROM THE ROOFTOPS.

Rummy organized it and Wolfowitz ran it with current and former Congressional staffers (the more times something is stamped the more official it looks) and they relied completely on immigrant and exhiled IRaqi's many via Chalabi.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Room101 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
37. Who else has reported this?
?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
44. I'm overwhelmed with emotion
mostly I'm so pissed off right now ...I just asked my seven
year old to read that headline ..He got the look of Fury ..
My son said "he must pay" ...I told him I will work very hard
to see that justice be served and we Impeach him ..

I'm crying ...Why wouldn't they listen to us ?
How many lives will be lost over this lie , to lead
an agressive war .

I'm calling the white house today ...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eloriel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #44
57. Letters to the editor, letters to the editor!
That will help get the thing more coverage, too.

Eloriel
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
46. name is WILSON not wilkinson...google wilson niger yellowcake WMDs
Edited on Tue Jul-08-03 02:56 PM by ElsewheresDaughter
you will get plenty of site and sources to the story

www.americanpolitics.com/punditpap.html

www.veteransforpeace.org/Bush_blair_lie_042003.htm

www.islam-online.net/English/News/ 2003-07/06/article07.shtml

www.redonion.blogspot.com

Op-Ed page of The New York Times on Sunday by Joseph C. Wilson 4th, a former ambassador who was sent to Niger, in West Africa, last year to investigate reports of the attempted purchase. He reported back that the intelligence was likely fraudulent, a warning that White House officials say never reached them

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftHander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #46
47. Nope different guy....
Charles Wilson and Terrance J. Wilkinson.....

you are mixing two separate stories about related info

WHo is this CIA consultant....???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #47
49. opps...correct...related stories different guys
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dirty Hippie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #47
51. I've emailed Capitol Hill Blue
and asked them who this guy is. If I get a response, I'll share.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #46
53. Wilkinson is different
Wilson had no way of being certain that his information was conveyed to the WH.

Wilkinson is saying he was present when it was discussed and even relates Bush's unbelievably damning response.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rich Hunt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #46
60. that guy??
I read this story already - two different names :

http://www.workingforchange.com/article.cfm?ItemID=15270

The Niger guy is Joseph Wilson.

So what is up with these Capitol Hill Blue people? I'm still not sure of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Caution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
50. Anyone heard of Wilkinson before?
I can't find any info on this guy on the Internet and no other confirmation of this story. Early yet, but if this one if true this is huge. If it can be proved that Bush flat out lied in the State of the Union address he's in serious trouble. The administration is being very careful on this one to try and say that they found out in February. And though this was still before the war began, the lie is MUCH worse if made to Congress in the Constitutionally mandates State of the Union.

Confirmation is definitely needed here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
9215 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #50
74. Something from June here

From a June 20th New York Times story (via the Oakland Tribune reprint of the story: <http://www.oaklandtribune.com/Stories/0,1413,82~1865~1467084,00.html>):

"It has been known that Task Force 20 has led the hunt for chemical and biological weapons. But the unit's role in trying to determine the fate of Saddam has not been previously disclosed. Some officials have suggested that the efforts are linked and that he or his sons left power with a precise knowledge of Iraq's weapons program." "Task Force 20, the military organization that defense officials said had been charged with conducting the search, reports to the Central Command and its leader, Gen. Tommy R. Franks. The Central Command has only recently acknowledged the existence of Task Force 20, and and a spokesman for the U.S. Central Command, James Wilkinson, said he would not comment on the special military team or its mission. But other United States officials said the team was being supported by several intelligence agencies, including the CIA, and was organized to allow it to act quickly on intelligence gathered by satellites and electronic eavesdropping." "J. (James) Wilkinson", in Iraq, linked (by the story at least) to the CIA and the hunt for WMD.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftHander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-03 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #50
82. Terence Wilkinson
I found info about Terence with one 'r'. He is a CEO Executive for a Holding Company that is concentrates on mining in Africa....specifically Plantinum.

Interesting....He could be the CIA consultant mentioned in the article from Capitol Hill Blue. I image that the mining industry is a small close knit field. And that if Uranium was being sold to Iraq this guy would have the connections to find out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quilp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
54. "Bush's response was anger"
That says it all. The world was not the way he wanted it. You do realize this child is the President of the United States of America?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
55. Meanwhile . . . here's the current MSNBC homepage headlines - 3:25 EDT
Edited on Tue Jul-08-03 02:30 PM by hatrack
"WORKPLACE SHOOTING" - in 20-point capitals takes up the center of the screen. Below it, conveniently placed, is a handy-dandy interactive feature - "Mass Shootings"

Above, the MSNBC Question of the Day - "Kobe Bryant - A Rush To Judgment?"

Then, finally, third down on the "Top Stories" sidebar, is the following:

"WP - Uranium buy story backed off"

Is that even English? Could they even theoretically write a shittier, more vague and stupid headline for this story?

Nahh, didn't think so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
62. Jail to the Thief!

The little turd lied and thousands died, just like he knew they would. He's his daddy's boy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Heddi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
64. Locking. Dupe
Please continue here: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=102&topic_id=2572&mesg_id=2572&page=

I know this thread has more replies than the other one, but the original message was posted nearly 5 hours prior to this one, and I only think it's fair to allow the earlier post to stay.

Thanks
Heddi
DU mod
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Heddi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
65. UNLOCKING THIS THREAD
I had read this wrongly and thought it was a dupe of another article.

I do apologize for the bad lock--I honestly thought it was a dupe of another article posted earlier.

Please do forgive my interrupting the conversation.

You may send me to my room without dinner if it so suits you :)

sorry!
heddi
du mod
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lfairban Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #65
67. By no means should you be sent to your room.
We like you here. It was an entirely forgivable mistake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rhiannon12866 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-18-03 02:17 AM
Response to Reply #65
108. I you want to stop by, I'll cook you dinner
What would you like?:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kathy in Cambridge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
68. Halle-Fucking-lujah!!
though the whole premise that Bush was mislead will be spread by the whore media. And Hitler didn't know about the concentration camps either...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
keek Donating Member (289 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
69. is it impeachment time yet?
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fishnfla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
72. "after US troops secured the country"
when were these meetings? the state of the union speech was in Jan., no? when was the UN resolution passed?

Once again the friendly folks at DU were RIGHT ALL ALONG!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fishnfla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #72
76. TEN MONTHS????
according to the BBC, it was in March of 2002
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trapper914 Donating Member (796 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
75. Poll numbers
Anyone seen recent poll numbers regarding whether Bush misled, exaggerated, or lied on WMD evidence? I think I saw one last week, but I can't remember where.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emillereid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
77. Impeach the asshole
Presidential lying and misuse of office doesn't get any worse than this. Impeach him and put him jail -- in Quantonamo!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-03 07:37 AM
Response to Original message
80. Wow!!
Let's get to work and bury this asshole.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-03 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #80
81. anything rated an even 5
deserves a kick!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
young_at_heart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-03 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
84. That begs the question, "What else has he lied about"?
There must be a few other lies here and there!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-03 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #84
87. Oh let's see
His military record
His business career (including not reporting his insider trading to the SEC for 18 months)
His ranch
They forgot to tell Congress or the people that they already knew North Korea had nukes before they voted to okay his going to the UN to get approval for the War in Iraq (which he never did)
"Iraq is an imminent threat"
"Iraq is developing/has WMD"
Links to al Qeada
The effects of the FIRST tax cuts on the deficit ($44TRILLION according to the analysis commissioned by Paul O'Neil before he got canned. They released that after he signed the SECOND cut into law)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-03 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
86. kick, kick, kick....
Bush* and his cohorts evidently thought that EVERYONE was as pathologically dishonest as they were. Now they're finding out that some of the folks who were present while they were pulling the wool over USAmericans' eyes were uncomfortable with the deception.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nottingham Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-03 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
88. Truth does comeout! Wilkinsons is blowing the lid off!
:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-03 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
89. Nothing but cold blooded murdering thugs!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Shame on them!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-03 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
90. WH knew 10 months before SOUA that niger uranium intel was forged/false
"Now the CIA official has told the BBC that Mr Wilson's findings had been passed onto the White House as early as March 2002.

That means that the administration would have known nearly a year before the State of the Union address that the information was likely false.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3056626.stm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElementaryPenguin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-03 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
92. There couldn't be a bigger SMOKING GUN than this!!!
And coming on the heels of "Bring 'em on!!!" BushCo is fucked forever and is soon to go down in flames!!! Spread this news to every corner of 'Murica!! The evil chimp has been busted!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElementaryPenguin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-03 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
94. Permanent Smoking Gun kick!!!
We've now got Chimpy by the balls!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElementaryPenguin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-03 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
98. Kick! Kick! Kick!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dansolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-03 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
99. Do you notice the subtle spin in the news reports?
I keep hearing references to "bad intelligence", as if the fault lay in the intelligence gathering. That is completely false. The intelligence wasn't bad, plenty of people knew that the Niger uranium story was false and that the documents were forgeries. The administration knowingly ignored the intelligence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-03 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
100. Capitol Hill Blue is discrediting its own story (for whatever reason)
Edited on Wed Jul-09-03 09:06 PM by robbedvoter
Seems source is a fraud.
http://www.capitolhillblue.com/artman/publish/article_2529.shtml
We'll have to make do with the indirect evidence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sophree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-03 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #100
102. I was wondering why the original link
Edited on Thu Jul-10-03 12:28 PM by Sophree
didn't contain the damaging information re: Shrub knowing the evidence was a fraud and ordering them to find someone who would back up the claim.

This is very odd.

On edit an excerpt:

After the story ran, we received a number of emails or phone calls that (1) either claimed Wilkinson was lying or (2) doubted his existence. I quickly dismissed the claims. After all, I had known this guy for 20+ years and had no doubt about his credibility. Some people wanted to talk to him, so I forwarded those requests on to him via email. He didn't answer my emails, which I found odd. I should have listened to a bell that should have been going off in my ear.

Today, a White House source I know and trust said visitor logs don't have any record of anyone named Terrance J. Wilkinson ever being present at a meeting with the President. Then a CIA source I trust said the agency had no record of a contract consultant with that name. "Nobody, and I mean nobody, has ever heard of this guy," my source said.

I tried calling Terry's phone number. I got a recorded message from a wireless phone provider saying the number was no longer in service. I tried a second phone number I had for him. Same result...

"You've been had," she said. "I know about this guy. He's been around for years, claiming to have been in Special Forces, with the CIA, with NSA. He hasn't worked for any of them and his name is not Terrance Wilkinson."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftHander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-03 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #102
104. He's been erased
When you are dealing with the CIA. People disappear.

I'll be you he is the same Terence Wilkinson from South Africa and a Terry Wilkinson who served in Vietnam.

Why would the WHite House verify the existence of a person who provided damaging evidence against shrub...

Its a cover up massive proportions.

:::Whoops my aluminum foil hat is crooked::::

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gingersnap Donating Member (420 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-03 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
105. he knew it was true because "God" told him so
is, I am sure, his defense. Just like "God" told him to attack the Taliban and strike Iraq.

What's so scary to me is that the Fundie discourse is so mainstream now (though Fundie's are still a distinct minority) that it is somehow acceptable for the President to rely on "God's advice" for foreign policy. I'm thinking of a recent link (about a week ago) to an interview in which Bush said God told him to attack Afghanistan and Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-03 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
106. no-----this story is retracted by the author
It's important to have this notice right up front.

The story has been retracted by Capitol Hill Blue. You can see other threads in GD for the details.

Unfortunately, when we spread this story, we confuse thousands of people who think Wilkinson is Wilson.

Which may be why the story was written in the first place -- to muddy the waters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC