Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Shark Fin Scandal Explodes in Ecuador (corruption exposed; fins ordered returned to poachers )

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Barrett808 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-05-07 11:07 AM
Original message
Shark Fin Scandal Explodes in Ecuador (corruption exposed; fins ordered returned to poachers )
Edited on Sun Aug-05-07 11:14 AM by Barrett808
Source: Sea Shepherd Conservation Society

Shark Fin Scandal Explodes in Ecuador: Sea Shepherd Director Illegally Ousted

All hell broke loose in Ecuador on Saturday over the exposure of political corruption connected with the wealthy shark fin mafia. The mayor of Quito, Paco Moncayo, attempted to block the illegal extradition of Sea Shepherd Conservation Society Director Sean O'Hearn-Gimenez with a writ of habeas corpus.

The issuance of a writ of habeas corpus meant that all procedures against O'Hearn-Gimenez should have been frozen until a legal hearing could be held on Monday. However, the government chose to ignore the law by forcing O'Hearn-Gimenez's immediate deportation in violation of the writ and Mayor Moncayo's orders. The Immigration Police seized O'Hearn-Gimenez with the intent to transport him to the Peruvian border. O'Hearn-Gimenez did not have a passport with him. He is an American citizen and a legal resident of Ecuador. The actions of the Immigration Police were blatantly illegal.

This happened because Sea Shepherd, in partnership with the Ecuadorian National Environmental Police, recently busted the biggest shark fin smuggling operation in the port city of Manta. O'Hearn-Gimenez and the police hit three different storage facilities, seizing nearly three tons of sharks fins (about 30,000 fins) and arresting over a dozen criminals—some very wealthy and well-connected criminals, as it turns out.

All of O'Hearn-Gimenez's activities were conducted in partnership with the police, and a legal warrant was obtained prior to raiding the storage areas where the illegal fins were found and confiscated. Sea Shepherd, a registered Ecuadorian non-governmental organization, is party to a signed agreement of cooperation with the Ecuadorian police. Sea Shepherd's role was to provide technical assistance to the police, who led the raid and made the arrests.

In response to the most recent raid and seizure, fishermen in Manta rioted. According to information received by the police, death threats were issued against O'Hearn-Gimenez, and a price was posted on his head. In response to these threats and the contract issued against O'Hearn-Gimenez, the National Police placed him under continuous armed guard.

O'Hearn-Gimenez was driving to a meeting in Quito—escorted by two National Police intelligence officers appointed by the Director General as a security detail—when an Immigration Police truck cut in front of them. Twelve Immigration Police officers jumped out and demanded credentials. They seized O'Hearn-Gimenez's Ecuadorian residency card and informed him that his visa had been revoked by order of the Civil Head of Immigration.

O'Hearn-Gimenez refused to leave the car until Sea Shepherd lawyer, Gina Solis, had arrived. Solis was roughed up by the Immigration Police when she attempted to speak with her client. O'Hearn-Gimenez was then taken to the Immigration Police headquarters and—without due process—orders were issued for his immediate deportation. O'Hearn-Gimenez was denied access to his lawyer during this procedurally insufficient hearing, which took place on Saturday, August 4 at 11:00 am. He made only one statement: "I think this hearing is not following Ecuadorian law and is unjust; let this be reflected on the record."

O'Hearn-Gimenez's wife, a native Ecuadorian from the Galapagos, arrived on the scene with their baby daughter and spoke to the media in defense of her husband's actions. She pointed out that O'Hearn-Gimenez was merely working to uphold the laws protecting marine wildlife in Ecuador and requested that Mayor Moncayo issue a writ of habeas corpus, which he did.

This incident has blown the lid off the cesspool of corruption within the government and military that has allowed unrestricted illegal trade in sharks and wildlife products to flourish in Ecuador.

Shockingly, the judge in Manta released all of the previously arrested poachers and ordered the return of the shark fins to the criminals.

Sea Shepherd has succeeded in revealing the names and faces of the people who control the illegal trade in shark fins. This trail of corruption is forcing those politicians and members of the military involved in the trade to expose themselves as guilty through their illegal attempts to protect criminals by persecuting Sea Shepherd staff and the police.

Sea Shepherd applauds the dedication to duty displayed by the National Police, Director of the Galapagos National Park Raquel Molina, Mayor Moncayo, and Congressman Carlos Gonzalez.

Captain Watson and his crew are on board the conservation research ship Farley Mowat just outside of Ecuadorian waters. Just yesterday, they seized an illegal longline set in the Galapagos Marine Reserve.

All efforts are being made to appeal to Ecuadorian President Rafael Correa to personally review this case and to use his presidential authority to defend justice. Sea Shepherd is confident that he will do so.

Sean O'Hearn-Gimenez needs your support. Please contact the U.S. Embassy in Quito by e-mail, phone, or fax to request legal protection for O'Hearn-Gimenez:

Linda L. Jewell
U.S. Ambassador to Ecuador
E-mail: consularquito@state.gov
Phone: 011-593-256-2890
Fax: 011-593-256-1524
After hours phone: 011-593-223-4126 or 011-593-256-1749



Sea Shepherd Galapagos Director Freed
Sea Shepherd News
News Releases

Ecuadorian President Rafael Correa has rescinded his deportation order against Sea Shepherd Conservation Society Director Sean O'Hearn-Gimenez and has freed him from custody. Public outrage in Ecuador against the news of O'Hearn-Gimenez's deportation and nationwide media coverage convinced the government to retract the deportation order.

The order to free O'Hearn-Gimenez came just five minutes before he was to be escorted onto a plane to be flown out of the country.

Sea Shepherd wishes to thank President Correa for this action and urges him to rescind the presidential decree that allows for the trade in shark fins. Sea Shepherd also urges the President to proceed with prosecutions against the shark fin smugglers who Sea Shepherd and the National Police arrested.

The arrests exposed the ringleaders of the shark fin mafia, and it was the arrests of these powerful underworld figures that triggered the political reprisals against Sea Shepherd and the National Police.

Sea Shepherd is preparing a detailed report on the incident and the overall situation within the next few days.

"This is a great victory," said Captain Paul Watson, Founder and President of Sea Shepherd. "We have exposed the scum who illegally trade in shark fins and marine wildlife products. The Ecuadorian public and media know who they are, and the politicians must now decide if they are pro-conservation or pro-criminal. I trust that President Correa will make the right decision and that Sea Shepherd will continue to work in cooperation with the National Police to eradicate this insidiously cruel illegal trade."

O'Hearn-Gimenez was reunited with his wife Elsa and their baby daughter. The family returned to Quito for pizza with Sea Shepherd lawyers, friends, and supporters to celebrate the President's decision to rescind his ordered deportation.

http://seashepherd.org/news/media_070804_3.html





Read more: http://seashepherd.org/news/media_070804_2.html



You can make your tax-deductible donation to Sea Shepherd Conservation Society at: http://seashepherd.org/donate.html .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-05-07 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
1. Victory for the sharks and other wildlife
K&R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ooglymoogly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-05-07 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. are sharks an endangered species....am I missing the point
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tyler Durden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-05-07 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. HOKAY, then I assume you SUPPORT...
Catching sharks by the hundreds, FINNING them (cutting off their dorsal and ventral fins plus the tail fins) WHILE THEY ARE STILL ALIVE, then throwing them back into the ocean to bleed to death or drown, saving only the fins.

This is so the Japanese can have "Shark Fin Soup."

And YES, you are missing the point: "Finning" is an illegal practice in most of the western hemisphere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ooglymoogly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-05-07 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. Well...if you put it that way
Edited on Sun Aug-05-07 02:52 PM by ooglymoogly
not for the suffering of any living thing...not even a fly....splat...no suffering there....seriously though I did not read the complete article nor did I have an understanding of its intent and should not have commented. No thing should have to suffer at the hands of man particularly on a scale such as this... I guess I am not very sympathetic to man eating sharks hunting off beaches where children swim and make us afraid of the water and this article was not about that...Suffering is entirely another issue and just to be clear I am not an advocate of that in any way and am just the opposite of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VLC Donating Member (487 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-05-07 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. Sharks hurting people at beaches?
What infinitesimal percentage of people does that happen to? The ocean is their home. Therefore when you go into the water, you are in their home. Expect conflicts every now and then.

Not trying to be rude to you, but people have encroached on every area where wildlife lives and then are surprised when there are consequences.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ooglymoogly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-05-07 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. guess I have seen too many Jaws movies
and was on Baker beach when a major shark attack happened....and a few others happened off the Faralons that same year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 11:52 PM
Response to Reply #11
32. Man eating what?
Shark attacks are so rare, and most of the very few that do occur are single bites caused by mistaken identity and even with the largest and most dangerous species they are almost invariably non-fatal. Actual predation of humans by sharks is exceedingly rare. Bees, lightning strikes and airplane crashes all kill many more people than sharks do, and humans are in much more danger on a trip to the beach of a car accident on the way or picking up a disease in the water than they will ever be from sharks.

On the other hand, uncounted millions of sharks are killed by humans every year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chulanowa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-05-07 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. No, they're not
Do they have to be in order for people to give a shit? 'Cause if so, we probably wouldn't have terribly long to wait until they qualify.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MockSwede Donating Member (579 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-05-07 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Yes they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chulanowa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-05-07 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Ah, my mistake
The point remains though. Does a species HAVE to be nearly extinct before we get concerned?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MockSwede Donating Member (579 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-05-07 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Yes
Many species of shark are, indeed, endangered. Overfishing is the cause - just like for all the other 'gutted' fishing resources around the world. I'm looking at the Gulf of Maine and the Grand Banks in my neck of the ocean and finding decimation of the fish stocks. 1600 native Atlantic Salmon? what a joke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-05-07 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. I'm sorry other people have to be rude to you

...simply because it is an issue that you had not been aware of.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ooglymoogly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-05-07 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. Thank you....I have developed a very thick skin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boudica the Lyoness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-05-07 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. The bit about beaches pissed me off
No it wasn't that you didn't know if sharks were endangered that pissed people off it was the thing you said about the beaches that really made me mad. What the hell are you saying? Do you think that sharks should be killed if they go near beaches or make people scared of the water? I'm scared of dip shits! So lets round 'em up and kill them!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ooglymoogly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-05-07 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. sorry pissed off english lady...just not on board with the save the
Edited on Sun Aug-05-07 06:09 PM by ooglymoogly
shark movement....unless they are endangered...if a species is endangered in my opinion it needs to saved at whatever cost and that includes man eating sharks.....otherwise how about a save the tuna now being over fished or just about any other species of fish that is being now over fished to dangerous levels. I'd sure get on board with that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barrett808 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-05-07 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. If sharks aren't endangered now, they soon will be
Current estimates range from 75 to 100 million taken per year. No large-body predator population can withstand that kind of cull for long.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ozone_man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-05-07 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. Over fishing is the issue.
Whether it's sharks, cod, or halibut, fish stocks in many regions are only vestigial populations with respect to the numbers that once existed before overfishing. Farley Mowat wrote in the "Sea of Slaughter" (1984) about this. Cod was once considered a trash fish when halibut were plenty. So much so that fisherman used to put long staffs in their gills when they were caught to prevent them from living as they were taken off the hook. These were sometimes six footers, and weighing up to 200lbs.

Now that cod are scarce, other less attractive fish show up at the market. And now sharks appear at the supermarket. Or worse, only their fins show up at Japanese fish markets. Ocean fish stocks are being depleted at an alarming rate, and will be reduced to only half the present levels by 2050, which are only remnant levels of what once was.

Whether it's shark fishing for fins for Japanese men who have sexual inadequacy issues, or shark fishing by macho sport fisherman who also have sexual inadequacy issues, it's time to give this species the respect they deserve. And all species of fish. Six billion people are just way too many to feed with ocean fish. Time to stop overpopulating the Earth or we'll wind up on a parking lot with only a few species left.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ooglymoogly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 07:55 AM
Response to Reply #25
27. full agreement on that nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladywnch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. and oh, by the way, this isn't just overfishing, this is pure waste.
as stated earlier, these sharks are being taken for soley their fins. The rest of the shark is tossed back into the ocean to die. They're not even harvesting the meat from the fish. This is truly barbaric. I don't support this slaughter, but if they are being taken at least use all that you take. When Alaskan natives take a whale...EVERYTHING is used.......EVERYTHING. This slaughter is wrong on SO many levels.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ozone_man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. Aboriginal hunters use most parts of the animal.
And it's integral to their culture to pay respect to the animals they hunt. They would never take a shark fin and waste the rest. They are among the few people who should be allowed to whale or seal hunt.

Fish need to be sustainably harvested. If we're over the sustainable limit, then we have to stop and let fish stocks recover. Personally, I think we need to gradually move beyond fish consumption, simply because the ocean can't sustain six billion people.

To prevent this sort of illegal trade, we have to go to the source, the demand side of the equation. Fisherman are just caught up in the demand for illegal marine life as are ivory hunters in Africa. Put pressure on the governments to enforce the law. Attack the demand side of the equation by creating negative publicity for cultures that support consumption of shark fin soup, trade in rhino horns, ivory, leopard skins, and all the rest. They've got to adjust to the environmental needs of the 21st century.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladywnch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. agreed.......eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 11:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
31. Yes, many of them are down 90%.
The largest species tend to be slow to reproduce, and almost all are suffering declines due to direct hunting, bycatch and loss of prey species.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-05-07 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
6. There is much more to this than even these great Sea Shepherd press releases reveal.
Rafael Correa was elected president of Ecuador last year with a big majority, and received an even bigger--an overwhelming--majority (80%) recently, on a referendum to re-write the Constitution. Correa is a U.S.-educated leftist economist, closely aligned with Evo Morales in Bolivia, and Hugo Chavez in Venezuela, and a key player in the Bolivarian Revolution (big movement for Latin American self-determination, social justice, democracy). The very corrupt, very entrenched rightwing/fascist elite--allied with rightwing paramilitaries, major drug traffickers and the Bush Junta/global corporate predators--have, of course, locked in their power in many ways--through corrupt political parties, in the courts, the bureaucracy and the legislature, in banking institutions and throughout Ecuadoran society. They have their hands on most of the levers of corrupt, behind-the-scenes power, and are using them to blockade Correa's Bolivarian reforms. Ecuador, like Argentina and many other South American countries, was ravaged by U.S. "free trade" (global corporate predation) and World Bank/IMF loan sharks. Correa has the overwhelming mandate of the people to clean this up, and to put Ecuador on a better footing, economically. The Constitutional reform will help him do this. That's why 80% of the people support it.

Correa is very clean, and very pro-Bolivarian (democratic). During his campaign, he would jokingly take off his belt and lash it at the corrupt rightwing elite who destroyed Ecuador's economy (his name, Correa, means "belt"). Who he beat in the election was the biggest banana plantation owner in Ecuador--symbol of the past, of big landowner oppression of workers and peasants. Correa has two main mandates: free Ecuador from ruinous "free trade"; clean the corruption out Ecuadoran government, at every level.

What occurs with rightwing elite control, time and again--for instance, right now in Colombia (which has a long border with Ecuador)--is that gangsters, drug traffickers, and criminal enterprises of every kind take over. We're seeing this in the U.S., with the Bush Junta--and so many filthily corrupt Congress members and Bush officials, and their corporate counterparts, sucking of the U.S. taxpayer. When you don't have government "of, by and for" the people, the greedy take over at all levels.

So this horrible shark fin traffic--a consequence of corrupt rightwing rule, that Correa was elected to remedy--is no surprise. Correa has hardly had time to deal with all of the vast corruption that preceded him. The re-write of the Constitution by stakeholder groups has only just begun. He's dealing with a corrupt legislature. Many entrenched, and very corrupt enterprises, are still at work, and they are no doubt allied with the criminal gangs, the rightwing paramilitaries and the extremely corrupt Colombian government across the border.

The rightwing paramilitaries in Colombia--guilty of horrendous atrocities against union leaders, poor peasants and political leftists, and of major drug trafficking--are very closely tied to the Uribe government (chief of the military, former intelligence chief, and many Uribe office holders including relatives). These are Bush's pals. The US "war on drugs," in so far as it was ever legitimate (and not just a police state boondoggle, here and in Colombia) has been 'turned' by the Bushites into a war on the poor, and, through the rightwing paramilitaries, a war democracy in Venezuela, Ecuador and Bolivia. Recent scandals in Colombia have revealed a rightwing paramilitary plot to assassinate Hugo Chavez and other democratic leaders in the Andes region (Correa and Morales) and destabilize their governments, so that rightwing dictatorships can be reestablished, to exploit the rich oil, gas, minerals and other resources of the region, and prevent the poor from benefiting from them.

Situations like this one on the coast--where fishermen have been profiting from criminal activity--are ripe for destabilization efforts. (One "riot" already occurred, according to these Sea Shepherd press releases.) This is similar to conditions in Venezuela, with regard to the oil industry, when Hugo Chavez was first elected. After failing at a violent military coup against Chavez, the rightwing elite (with support from the Bush Junta and global corporate predators) then instigated an oil professionals' strike, aimed at crippling the country and toppling the Chavez government. The USAID pays for and instigates these kinds of activities.

So this matter is not limited to its environmental implications. It is a much bigger fight for clean government, the rule of law and economic fairness. WHAT is going on, in the Ecuadoran fishing industry, that has driven fishermen into illegal activity? WHAT has been going on in the government (massive thievery, vast corruption, no doubt) so that there are no resources to help the fishermen--even though Ecuador is rich in natural resources? Where are profits from Ecuadoran resources going? (--not to the poor people who live there, obviously).

Correa also opposes the vastly corrupting U.S. "war on drugs." The "war on drugs" corruption feeds into these other criminal enterprises. He has vowed not to renew the lease to the U.S. military base in Ecuador. The Bolivarians see quite clearly what the U.S. "war on drugs" is doing: It is driving poor peasant farmers off the land, and into urban squalor, so that the big drug traffickers and U.S. and other foreign corporations can grab and exploit the land and its resources. It is pouring billions of dollars in military aid into the wrong hands, in Colombia, a potential launching pad for U.S.-backed rightwing juntas. It is brutalizing the poor--destroying food crops and animals--and damaging human DNA with aerial spraying of U.S. chem pesticides, and furthermore by unleashing murderous rightwing paramilitaries against the poor. It is militarizing what would be a mere civilian problem (coca leaf growing--a local traditional medicine herb, grown for thousands of years for that purpose) if it were not for the big drug cartels, which the "war on drugs" somehow never manages to curtail. And it is a gross violation of the sovereignty of Latin American countries. The rightwing elites invite the U.S. military, and billions in military aid, into their countries, for their own benefit--to give them weapons for oppressing the poor, and, in many cases, to FOSTER criminal activities in which they are engaged.

Illegal trade in endangered species is just one of them. Slave labor and sweatshop labor ("free trade") is another. Drugs are another. Illicit arms dealing is another.

I think the Bolivarians will win this fight. They have the overwhelming will of the people behind them--and are, in many ways, far better and stronger democracies than our own (where the will of the people has been thwarted by both parties). In this situation, in Ecuador, I would be on the alert for Bush/USAID $$ to the fishermen, for more "riots."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladywnch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-05-07 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. I follow and agree with everything you are saying here but I do have
one very small question .....when you type "USAID" is that an acronym for "United States aid" or for something else? I ask because I've not seen aid referred to that way before (USAID). -thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ret5hd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-05-07 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. United States Agency for International Development (USAID)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
starroute Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-05-07 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Here are details on the USAID is meddling in Venezuela
Edited on Sun Aug-05-07 03:33 PM by starroute
http://rightweb.irc-online.org/rw/4405

Several months after the unsuccessful April 2002 coup in Venezuela, the U.S. State Department established an Office of Transition Initiatives (OTI) in Caracas, using money from USAID. Operating out of the U.S. Embassy, OTI has two stated objectives, according to the agency: to "strengthen democratic institutions and promote space for democratic dialogue," and "encourage citizen participation in the democratic process."

USAID established OTI with the all-but-explicit intention of aiding efforts to oust President Chávez. According to USAID, the new office would "provide fast, flexible, short-term assistance targeted at key transition needs."

Although it did not spell out what would be the desired "transition," USAID warned that Chávez "has been slowly hijacking the machinery of government and developing parallel non-democratic governance structures." In its 2001 job description for the new OTI director in Caracas, USAID stated that the director's responsibilities would include "formulating strategy and initiating the new OTI program in close coordination with U.S. political interests" and "developing an exit strategy and operational closeout plan."

Rather than directly funding Venezuelan organizations and political parties, OTI channels USAID funding through U.S. nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) that in turn fund scores of Venezuelan NGOs and political party projects. In its January-March 2007 report, USAID reported 139 subgrants to Venezuelan entities working in 19 of the country's 23 states.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-05-07 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. Thanks for posting this. Will read it later tonight. It looks very helpful. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1monster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-05-07 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
7. Sending this to the greatest.
R #5
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-05-07 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
8. Gee, the government and the military involved in a corruption scandal
dealing with illegal trade. Thank God that never happens here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-05-07 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
14. There may be bigger fish to fry.
Edited on Sun Aug-05-07 02:48 PM by formercia
During the War in Central America, poachers were illegally taking lobsters out of Nicaraguan waters and mysteriously managed to completely evade the Nicaraguan patrol boats. It wasn't surprising, since someone in the US Government was tasking spy satellites to keep track of the patrol boats and were passing the information to the poachers. Coincidentally the poachers were supplying the lobsters to a major US seafood restaurant chain owned by a Fortune 500 US corporation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyingfysh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-05-07 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
19. this will help scallop fishermen
Sharks eat rays, which in turn eat scallops. Scallop harvests are way down, because there are many fewer sharks, and so more rays.

You can't eliminate lots of any one species without causing all kinds of upsets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tyler Durden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 06:03 AM
Response to Reply #19
26. Not for nought is it called "The Balance of Nature."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slowry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
29. Sharkwater movie trailer (for those unaware of the colossal impact of this).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 11:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC