Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

We can't wait for the Iraqi army to stand up...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
dEMOK Donating Member (833 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-08-07 07:36 AM
Original message
We can't wait for the Iraqi army to stand up...
Edited on Sun Jul-08-07 08:01 AM by dEMOK
Source: San Fransisco Chronicle

Joel Brinkley
Sunday, July 8, 2007

BY OCTOBER 2005, the Iraq war was almost 2 years old but already seemed to have been under way forever. The United States had been training Iraqi troops for about a year, and in an assessment for Congress that month, the military said the Iraqi army would not be ready for "autonomous operations for at least a year."

To defeat the insurgency, the Pentagon said then, the United States would have to train and equip 325,000 soldiers and police -- by 2007.

Last month, the House Armed Services Committee noted in a report that Iraq's army and police now number almost 350,000. And yet, in congressional testimony last month, Lt. Gen. Martin Dempsey, who was in charge to the training program, offered a highly qualified new estimate of when Iraqi forces might be able to take over control of the country.

"By the end of the year, potentially," he said. But autonomous operations, the 2005 goal, still remain "a ways off." Brig. Gen Dana Pittard, who is still in Iraq, training Iraqi troops, predicted: "It'll take years."<snip>

Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2007/07/08/EDGOTQ8JC01.DTL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-08-07 07:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. The clowns in charge don't want the Iraqi army to stand up
If the Iraqis could handle their own security we would have to leave. and Halliburton doesn't want to stop its lucrative looting of both the U.S. Treasury and the Iraqi resources.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dEMOK Donating Member (833 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-08-07 07:49 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Could you please...
...stop making sense?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glowing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-08-07 07:51 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Exactly, and they were told going into Iraq, "don't disband the army"
Keep them together trained like they were under Saddam... As soon as the army was disbanned, they ran for the hills and grabbed up all the weapons they new about, and started fighting against the US occupation. We shouldn't have gone in there in the first place... it is the mess that I said it would be when everyone was biting off my head trying to get there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frogcycle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-08-07 07:56 AM
Response to Original message
4. lying fucks
the Iraqi army CAN do it. They just have to have to{/em]

Oh, the form of government might have to be totalitarian, with mandatory conscription, and harsh penalties for desertion, but they can damned well do it. The very people who are joining militias and insurgencies, getting surreptitious training in making IED's, in sniper schools are the ones who would be pressed in to service and told "shut down the carnage or you're toast"

By saying we can't leave until their karma moves them to step up, our administration and its hand-picked toadies now leading the military are claiming a paternal, colonial, imperialist right over the Iraqi people as incompetent children whom we must continue to "help" (dominate). And from whom we must suck vast quantities of oil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
High Plains Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-08-07 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #4
11. Where's Saddam when we need him?
Oops, we killed the strong man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cureautismnow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-08-07 08:05 AM
Response to Original message
5. They WERE standing up...
... until we invaded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rasputin1952 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-08-07 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
6. A hard lesson in reality....
If you can get someone else to fight and die for you, there is no incentive to protect yourself. Most sane individuals realize that there is no point in oneself dying, if others are "willing" to so it for you.

In a "win-win" situation, the Iraqi's get a well equipped military and don't have to use it. In a "lose-lose" situation...Coalition forces go into battle, get maimed and killed w/o dedicated Iraqi support.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dEMOK Donating Member (833 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-08-07 08:17 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. If we were "invited" to invade Iraq...
...it would be just a little bit easier to criticize Iraqi's for not stepping up?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rasputin1952 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-08-07 08:47 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. The "invited" situation has been used many times before...
no one asks for an invasion though, generally they ask for help...Saddam certainly did not ask for "help".

bush is wholly to blame for this fiasco...he is, after all, the "decider guy"...:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-08-07 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. They ARE fighting for themselves
The true Iraqi army consists of the insurgency which is about to run our sorry asses out of their country.

This pretend Iraqi army that we train is nothing more than insurgents in training who leave to join the insurgency.

Its all smoke and fucking mirrors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rasputin1952 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-08-07 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. I have thought that this whole thing has been nothing but arming...
people who will turn those arms against their own as soon as the find it feasible. The coming bloodbath is too horrible to contemplate.

The whole notion of "settling old scores", is beyond our comprehension. Middle Eastern culture is completely different from what we are generally exposed to. People hold grudges for many generations, and are proud to act in what they believe are honor bound ideals. We should have learned in WWII, from the Japanese, what price fanaticism will pay, but bush and his cronies can think in only one dimension, they believe they have all of the wisdom the world has too offer, and yet they forgot the base tenet in military thinking....First, know your enemy.

Hell, they can't even get democracy right, and they want to expand their version upon a world that does not want it.

We will be paying for this for generations. bush is the epitome of idiocy, and his minions haven't a clue...they live in a phantom world, fantasizing about nothing but wealth they can acquire.

The evil is palpable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-08-07 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
9. They ARE standing up
The Iraqi army consists of the insurgents who are kicking our asses. The people we pay to join the flunkie government's army that we set up are traitors to their country. Most join, get a gun and some training and then leave for the insurgency.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 11:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC