Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Journalist bill may benefit terrorists, House panel told(Conyers: DOJ officials' remarks are absurd)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 06:31 AM
Original message
Journalist bill may benefit terrorists, House panel told(Conyers: DOJ officials' remarks are absurd)
Edited on Fri Jun-15-07 06:39 AM by maddezmom
Source: SFGate

Committee chair says Justice officials' remarks are 'absurd'
Zachary Coile, Chronicle Washington Bureau

Friday, June 15, 2007

(06-15) 04:00 PDT Washington -- The Bush administration, which opposes legislation to shield journalists from revealing their confidential sources, warned lawmakers Thursday that the measure's broad definition of journalists could protect the media wings of terrorist groups.

But House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers, D-Mich., challenged the Justice Department's claim, calling it "totally absurd."

The administration made the assertion that terrorists would seek to evade prosecution by invoking a reporter's privilege in federal court at a Judiciary Committee hearing on the media shield bill. The bill would protect reporters, in most cases, from having to disclose their confidential sources or turn over documents to federal prosecutors.

Although the effort to protect reporters stalled last year in the House and Senate, supporters said its prospects appear to be improving in the new Congress controlled by Democrats.

Rachael Brand, assistant attorney general in the office of legal policy, said criminals might post documents or video on Web sites, then invoke the new protections for journalists in an effort to thwart prosecutors. The groups could include "media components of terrorist organizations," she said.



Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/06/15/MNGDVQFUTK1.DTL&feed=rss.news
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 07:18 AM
Response to Original message
1. Conyers Backs Journalists, Slams Media
Conyers Backs Journalists, Slams Media

(Broadcasting & Cable) _ The House Judiciary Committee held its first hearing on the proposed federal shield law Thursday.

The law would protect journalists' sources, including those of bloggers, in federalo investigations, with some carve-outs for national security, trade seccrets or personal health information, but a just would have to determine that seeking those sources trumped the public's interest in protecting them.

Committee Chairman John Conyers (D-Mich.) supports the bill, but in his opening remarks THursday suggested that reporters needed protection not only from federal investigators but from their own corporate parents.

more:http://videoediting.digitalmedianet.com/articles/viewarticle.jsp?id=151898
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
2. Thats the the WH has now: Terror fears and rhetoric.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
3. If this bill fails, the terrorists can always fall back on their previous position
Invoking executive privilege to avoid testifying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC