Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

States Finding Fiscal Surprise: A Cash Surplus

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 06:13 AM
Original message
States Finding Fiscal Surprise: A Cash Surplus
Source: NYTimes





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

June 11, 2007
States Finding Fiscal Surprise: A Cash Surplus
By JENNIFER STEINHAUER

State lawmakers across the country, their coffers unexpectedly full of cash, have been handing out tax cuts, spending money on fixing roads, schools and public buildings, and socking something away for less fruitful years.

Budget surpluses have largely stemmed from higher than expected tax collections — corporate tax revenues alone were 11 percent higher than budget estimates — and booming local economies. There has also been some relief in Medicaid spending, which fell from an 11 percent annual growth rate to something closer to 7 percent in the past few years.

More than 40 states have found themselves with more money than they planned as they wound down their regular sessions. Governors in 23 of those states proposed tax cuts, and a majority of states with surpluses chose to shore up their roads, schools and rainy day funds...The extra cash over the last two budget sessions (many states work on a two-year cycle) is at the highest level since 2000, state budget experts say. States, burned by several years of shortfalls, kept their estimates of total revenues on the conservative side and are now reaping plenty...Like teenagers who went without allowance, legislators have been working off pent-up demand. Many states are largely using surpluses to tackle long-term and costly problems like the uninsured and crumbling infrastructures....

Over all in the 2007 fiscal year, which ends at the end of this month, state spending in the 50 states totaled $616 billion, an increase of about 8.6 percent over 2006, according to a report by the National Governors Association and National Association of State Budget Officers. The average annual growth rate over the past three decades has been 6.5 percent, the report said.

Only a handful of states have had to cut budgets, led by Michigan, which has suffered six straight years of job losses. Texas issued the largest property tax cut in its history — $14.2 billion for the biennium, representing roughly a one-third decrease for average home owners....




Catherine Billey contributed reporting.

Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/11/us/11legislature.html?_r=1&ref=us&oref=slogin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 06:18 AM
Response to Original message
1. Excellent
Universal health care would be nice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 06:20 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Not So Good In Michigan, My Home
And I'm sure George will figure out a way to screw the other states out of that money right quick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 07:32 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. Sounds like they are doing the exact opposite
Medicare spending fell from 13% to 7%. Give the money to the wealthy and screw the sick..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catch22Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 06:22 AM
Response to Original message
3. Good, they can spend it on gasoline for state vehicles (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluerum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 06:34 AM
Response to Original message
4. Only a handful of "Blue" states have had to cut budgets. MA is one of them.
I read this with a great deal of skepticism.

They forgot to add, "After several years of shortfalls and steadily increasing property taxes, states can now look to repair neglected infrastructure."

They are also going to have to figure out how to bail out the homeowners and lenders getting burned by ballooning mortgages.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 06:38 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. You'll Wait a Long Time for That To Happen!
After all, your average homeowner isn't worth keeping--not unless the drain affects tax revenues!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skids Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 06:38 AM
Response to Original message
6. 6.5 percent? Sounds about as much as...

...the true rate of inflation.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 06:38 AM
Response to Original message
7. A few paragraphs down, however...
shows that these states didn't spend a damned dime on things like
higher education, roads, or bridges, etc. "early in the decade."

The dollars now needed to fix infrastructure problems are worth a
lot less than they were when the states weren't spending.

Did that make any sense? I need more coffee.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DFW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 06:55 AM
Response to Original message
8. Typical Texas
The general state of our public schools is pitiful.
We have one shining light in Highland Park (Dallas)
and there is another top Techie-type high school in the
area, but in general, the State public school system needs
a desperate boost--far more so than Ross Perot needs a
reduction in his property tax.

I also note that in general, corporate tax revenues are
responsible for most of this new positive state of affairs.
This makes sense, as I don't know of the empployment
situation having improved for the average working man
or woman out there in the recent past.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. And they shouldn't spend windfall taxes on on-going services.
I was in California in the early '90s; in the late '80s, tax revenues kept increasing, so spending on services kept increasing.

Then in '92 there was a bit of a recession and California, having a highly progressive income tax at the time, was in deep trouble. Tax revenues were far below expectations; when they suggested cutting the services they'd just increased, there was hell to pay, and all kinds of discretionary items (infrastructure, higher ed, etc.) were cut sharply.

Steady-state expenditures should, with the minimum amount needed for infrastructure and the like, never exceed baseline tax revenues. Look at the most recent recession and assume *that* will be your annual revenues, adjusted for inflation, idefinitely. Then windfalls can be spend on temporary programs, one-shot deals, that kind of thing. Much less pain all around....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ananda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 08:14 AM
Response to Original message
10. deceptive re Texas
Edited on Mon Jun-11-07 08:16 AM by ananda
Texas legislators didn't do that much for Texans.
The so-called property tax cut isn't much really,
and the only good they did, afaict, is to put
127k children back on CHIP (health care).

They didn't do anything to get college tuition
in line, and they didn't do much for teachers
either... and teacher retirees haven't had a
cost of living increase since 2001.

Also, they didn't do anything to contain
pollution or get electricity rates in line...
Our legislators are whores to corporations
and mean-spirited as well.

Go Texas (sarcasm).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
11. when you print enough money, there is always a surplus....
welcome to our fiat economy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mbperrin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
12. Well, lessee in Texas,
teachers got a $425 a year raise that their local district can divert for other purposes if they wish, the Guvnor got a $35,000 raise, the attempt to sell off the public highway system to convert to private toll roads didn't succeed, but neither did an effort to restore fuel taxes for highway maintenance.

Billions were held back for so-called property tax relief, although my personal property taxes have increased between ten and eighteen per cent every year since we started talking this nonsense, although I do note that Exxon, Sun, and some other energy folk did indeed save large sums on their mineral property holdings, so yeah, that's Texas.

It's like a whole other country, all right, just pretty much a banana republic in the hands of lackeys and their corporate masters.

Why don't I move? I was born here, and these bastards cannot run me out! Surely even being in league with Satan cannot leave them around forever, can it? ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
13. Pork..............
The more they have the more they shell out in NY..........PORK represent the biggest stumbling block in budget control in NY State Along with both Sheldon Silver & Joe Bruno. Both Dem's & Gop fight over who can hand out our money and look like the good guy to the voter. NY needs school tax reform and the balance should go to reducing the average property owners tax. NY City taxpayer do not pay for separate school tax as those upstate do. My school tax goes up on average of 8-10 per cent yearly and cost more than my entire town taxes. Ny taxes are driving citizens away from the state, they are unfair & unbalanced between the upstate and Ny City.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Matariki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
14. Does that mean that the BushCo. is working on how to get their greedy hands on the surplus?
What can Halliburton overcharge the states for... let's see...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC