Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senate Moves to Expand Detainee Rights

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 06:43 PM
Original message
Senate Moves to Expand Detainee Rights
Source: Associated Press

Senate Moves to Expand Detainee Rights
Email this Story

May 25, 7:03 PM (ET)

By ANNE FLAHERTY

WASHINGTON (AP) - Senate Democrats are backing a bill that would grant new rights to terror suspects held at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, including access to a lawyer regardless of whether the prisoners are put on trial.

The proposal, approved this week by the Senate Armed Services Committee, also would narrow the definition of an enemy combatant and tighten restrictions on the types of evidence used to prosecute and keep a person detained.


A guards sits in a tower overlooking Guantanamo detention camp, at Guantanamo Bay US Naval Base, Cuba, Tuesday, May 15, 2007. The Guantanamo detention camps are being transformed into a more tightly controlled prison for a core group of alleged terrorists while many marginal detainees no longer seen as a threat have been transferred, Admiral Harry B. Harris, commander of the detention center, said before leaving his post Tuesday, May 22, 2007. (AP Photo/Brennan Linsley)

The bill is aimed primarily at increasing legal protections for the hundreds of people captured by the United States and held for years on suspicion of terror ties without a trial. Only those selected for prosecution - typically the most high-profile suspected terrorists - are guaranteed legal counsel and other rights when they go to court.

The legislation has raised red flags at the White House as potential veto bait and among congressional Republicans, including Sen. Lindsey Graham, who said he was concerned that aspects of the bill may go too far.


Read more: http://apnews.excite.com/article/20070525/D8PBMN0G0.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. 25 - 0
That's a nice margin. Now we have to hope that Graham and the others don't gut it when it comes up for discussion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. Oh come on, AP. "New" rights? These are ancestral rights.
At one time it was actually believed that all human beings had certain rights when being placed in the custody of the US federal government, whether foreigner or citizen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nealmhughes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Indeed, they are merely proposing to allow the exercise of the jailed, the Congress and admin.
had no right to disallow their rights under the UN Charter and the US Constitution or the Geneva Conventions.

Let us recall a headless Stuart king in Janurary 1649, let us recall the revolt of the barons and Runnymede in 1215, or the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights in 1948.

None of these men's rights have been lost, only their access to them curtailed, and that is the definition of a tyrant: arbitrary jailing and torture with denial of a defense or due process at a single person's pleasure.

No, their rights are not being expanded -- the exercise of them shall be restored.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Yes, what you said. Well presented.
Restoration of rights isn't granting them new rights they never could have even envisioned before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MasonJar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
5. It would be appropriate if W remembered Runnymeade. He is the
Edited on Fri May-25-07 11:22 PM by MasonJar
King John of the USA. Also the 17th century Falwells took off Charlie's head so they could stop the sinful ways (encouraged in plays by Shakespeare and Marlowe and Jonson and all the wonderful etcs.) from cropping up in London. Cromwell and the Roundheads were the precursors of Bush and his cabal, the foreshadowing of the 21st century Taliban and the Evangelicals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2Design Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-26-07 12:03 AM
Response to Original message
6. yeah, right and they will fold on this too - the fact that usa leadership
and congress critters support torture is horrific - if they did not support it - they would stop it - this bs is just ridiculous and an embarassment for usa people - they no longer represent the people other than the ones they have been able to brain wash
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-26-07 07:38 AM
Response to Original message
7. USA; not a world leader any more.
The only nations who want to follow our lead now are those nations who want to torture and detain their "enemies" without being "hampered" by stupid shit like human rights and rule of law.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 05:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC