|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
truthpusher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-03-07 08:23 AM Original message |
(Time) Magazine's list of 100 most influential doesn't include Bush |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lse7581011 (948 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-03-07 08:27 AM Response to Original message |
1. SLAM! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sinkingfeeling (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-03-07 08:28 AM Response to Original message |
2. Great because he's not !!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
corkhead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-03-07 12:10 PM Response to Reply #2 |
21. Oh, I would argue that he, or at least his organ grinder should be, much like Attila the Hun |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pacifist Patriot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-03-07 12:21 PM Response to Reply #21 |
25. I agree. Influence in and of itself is neutral... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sinkingfeeling (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-03-07 01:25 PM Response to Reply #21 |
36. I agree that the organ grinder could be a very influential person, but not the person, G.W. Bush! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flaminbats (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-04-07 04:37 PM Response to Reply #21 |
61. I disagree... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
THUNDER HANDS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-03-07 08:30 AM Response to Original message |
3. well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
closeupready (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-03-07 09:40 AM Response to Reply #3 |
10. Duh, I think that's why they have pictures with the article. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Me. (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-03-07 08:30 AM Response to Original message |
4. This Is Interesting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vidar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-03-07 08:49 AM Response to Original message |
5. The mad marionette doesn't make the list. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LibDemAlways (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-03-07 08:56 AM Response to Original message |
6. What's interesting to me is the cover shot, clearly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goclark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-26-07 01:39 PM Response to Reply #6 |
71. And Obama is the focal point in the photo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RT_Fanatic (162 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-03-07 09:00 AM Response to Original message |
7. Top 100? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RT_Fanatic (162 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-03-07 09:00 AM Response to Original message |
8. Top 100? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ian David (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-03-07 09:16 AM Response to Original message |
9. Are Stephen Colbert, Keith Olbermann and Jon Stewart on the list? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PegDAC (906 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-03-07 01:59 PM Response to Reply #9 |
40. No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ian David (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-03-07 03:19 PM Response to Reply #40 |
44. You think Time Magazine will be dead to him, or just on notice? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Initech (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-03-07 02:15 PM Response to Reply #9 |
43. Sadly, Tyra Banks and Oprah are on the list. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rob H. (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-03-07 09:47 AM Response to Original message |
11. Cheney's not on the list, either |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
muriel_volestrangler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-03-07 09:49 AM Response to Original message |
12. Putting Elizabeth II on the list seems a bit strange |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftishBrit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-03-07 01:11 PM Response to Reply #12 |
33. That's what I thought! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
edbermac (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-03-07 10:04 AM Response to Original message |
13. Wrong! He is the MOST INFLUENTIAL person in the world! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democrat2thecore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-03-07 10:07 AM Response to Original message |
14. Silly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wake.up.america (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-03-07 12:36 PM Response to Reply #14 |
29. "Time" is out to lunch. I get the magazine for next to nothing. Only reason I read it, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Psephos (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-06-07 01:51 PM Response to Reply #14 |
66. self-delete (wrong subthread) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CentralEuropeanDude (115 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-03-07 10:34 AM Response to Original message |
15. Where is Putin? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dulcinea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-03-07 10:40 AM Response to Original message |
16. Boy George doesn't influence anything. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ferret Annica (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-03-07 12:24 PM Response to Reply #16 |
26. heehee, shame on you; |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
StarryNite (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-03-07 04:33 PM Response to Reply #26 |
52. Yeah! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftishBrit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-03-07 01:25 PM Response to Reply #16 |
35. In that case.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Decruiter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-03-07 11:16 PM Response to Reply #35 |
58. Or The Architect? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EstimatedProphet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-03-07 10:54 AM Response to Original message |
17. But of course, scumbucket Rice made the list |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sneakythomas (89 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-03-07 10:59 AM Response to Original message |
18. I lost interest about forty years ago |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marnieworld (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-03-07 11:06 AM Response to Original message |
19. oooohhhh burn |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Initech (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-03-07 11:19 AM Response to Original message |
20. Osama made the list ahead of Bush? Oh snap! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bdamomma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-03-07 01:35 PM Response to Reply #20 |
39. george is probably saying I thought I was greatest terrorist!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Initech (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-03-07 02:13 PM Response to Reply #39 |
42. He probably is! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vinca (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-03-07 12:16 PM Response to Original message |
22. Actually, he should be #1 on the list. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pacifist Patriot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-03-07 12:19 PM Response to Reply #22 |
24. I know Bush has certainly influenced me greatly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pacifist Patriot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-03-07 12:17 PM Response to Original message |
23. Who else thinks a dead guy made the list while Bush didn't? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LostinVA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-26-07 08:39 AM Response to Reply #23 |
68. I also think he's probably dead |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fryguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-03-07 12:27 PM Response to Original message |
27. how many current US presidents have been left off the list in past years? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rcdean (229 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-03-07 12:30 PM Response to Original message |
28. In the true sense of the word "Influential" this is absolutely correct. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewJeffCT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-03-07 12:38 PM Response to Original message |
30. Ha, George Clooney is on the list! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JoFerret (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-03-07 03:30 PM Response to Reply #30 |
47. Who is George Clooney? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewJeffCT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-03-07 03:36 PM Response to Reply #47 |
48. Clooney... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thereismore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-03-07 12:39 PM Response to Original message |
31. Wasn't he* Man of the year once upon a time? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sequoia (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-03-07 01:09 PM Response to Reply #31 |
32. He sure was. TIME should do another with big ole X across the cover. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Decruiter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-03-07 11:10 PM Response to Reply #32 |
57. X out like CNN did with Cheney |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laurab (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-04-07 12:05 AM Response to Reply #31 |
59. Yes, he was - that was when I cancelled my subscription |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftishBrit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-03-07 01:24 PM Response to Original message |
34. Bush should have been there as 'influential' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bdamomma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-03-07 01:30 PM Response to Original message |
37. oh wow, Pelosi is on the list, but bushie isn't too bad bushie |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geardaddy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-03-07 01:31 PM Response to Original message |
38. I hate *, but he should have been on the list. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bmbmd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-03-07 02:04 PM Response to Original message |
41. Well he is unable to influence either friend or foe- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KamaAina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-03-07 03:20 PM Response to Original message |
45. Borat is on the list, and he's not!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KamaAina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-03-07 03:20 PM Response to Original message |
46. It says "100 Most Influential *People* in The World" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tabasco (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-03-07 03:43 PM Response to Original message |
49. This reflects the loss of the USA's influence worldwide. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bicoastal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-03-07 03:59 PM Response to Original message |
50. ELIZABETH EDWARDS is on the list! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-03-07 04:29 PM Response to Original message |
51. WTF he belongs on that list |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brentspeak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-03-07 04:46 PM Response to Reply #51 |
53. I agree. It doesn't make any sense why he isn't number one or two, let alone on the list, at all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-03-07 05:27 PM Response to Original message |
54. Well it wasn't the list of the worlds 100 biggest dumbasses was it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
superconnected (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-03-07 05:36 PM Response to Original message |
55. hahahaha! it does include obama and pelosi |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cliss (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-03-07 07:03 PM Response to Original message |
56. Oh, they should include him all right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fujiyama (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-04-07 12:42 AM Response to Original message |
60. This was likely |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rocktivity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-04-07 04:51 PM Response to Original message |
62. Bush is the OPPOSITE of influential |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Up2Late (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-05-07 10:42 PM Response to Original message |
63. Did anyone else notice the Time didn't even have the GUTS to print an actual Top 100 LIST this year? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RockLacrosse20 (23 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-05-07 10:44 PM Response to Original message |
64. to be honest, he should be on there |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flaminbats (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-06-07 01:09 PM Response to Reply #64 |
65. I don't think Bush made that decision.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Psephos (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-06-07 01:57 PM Response to Original message |
67. Okaaaaayyyyyy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pettypace (695 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-26-07 10:37 AM Response to Original message |
69. W is becoming irrelevant |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lpbk2713 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-26-07 10:50 AM Response to Original message |
70. Nor did OxyRush Limbaugh make the list. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 11:59 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC