Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

(Time) Magazine's list of 100 most influential doesn't include Bush

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
truthpusher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 08:23 AM
Original message
(Time) Magazine's list of 100 most influential doesn't include Bush
Edited on Thu May-03-07 09:21 AM by truthpusher
Source: USA Today




Time just released its annual list of "The Most Influential People in the World."

George Clooney made the list. So did Osama bin Laden and Warren Buffett.

Who's missing? President Bush.

Leaders & Revolutionaries

• King Abdullah, Saudi Arabia
• Peter Akinola, archbishiop, Nigeria
• Mohamed Omar Hassan Ahmed al-Bashir, president, Sudan
• Osama bin Laden
• Michael Bloomberg, mayor, New York City
• Raul Castro, acting president, Cuba
• Hillary Clinton, U.S. senator from New York
• Queen Elizabeth II, United Kingdom
• Sonia Gandhi, chair, Indian National Congress Party
• Hu Jintao, president, China
• Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Supreme Leader, Iran
• Liu Qi, chief, Beijing Olympic Committee
• Tzipi Livni, foreign minister, Israel
• Angela Merkel, chancellor, Germany
• Barack Obama, U.S. senator from Illinois
• Nancy Pelosi, speaker, U.S. House of Representatives
• David Petraeus, commanding general, U.S. Army
• Pope Benedict XVI
• Condoleezza Rice, U.S. secretary of state
• John Roberts, chief justice, U.S. Supreme Court
• Arnold Schwarzenegger, governor, California





Read more: http://blogs.usatoday.com/ondeadline/2007/05/magazines_list_.html?csp=34
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lse7581011 Donating Member (948 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 08:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. SLAM! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
2. Great because he's not !!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
corkhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
21. Oh, I would argue that he, or at least his organ grinder should be, much like Attila the Hun
would have been in his day. I don't think you have to be good to be influential.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. I agree. Influence in and of itself is neutral...
It is what that influence is used to accomplish that determines good or evil. I would say Bush Co. is HIGHLY influential...but evilly so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #21
36. I agree that the organ grinder could be a very influential person, but not the person, G.W. Bush!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flaminbats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #21
61. I disagree...
I think Bush only listens to the advice of the "Republican elders".

Bush views himself as part of a fellowship, appointed to support the policies produced by Cheney along with other leaders of the GOP and be the spokesperson for that leadership. but Bush isn't the leader, he is only the loyal puppet who never questions the policies or those who support them.

King Abdullah, Saudi Arabia
Tzipi Livni, foreign minister, Israel
David Petraeus, commanding general, U.S. Army
Condoleezza Rice, U.S. secretary of state

since the decline of Cheney's health, the leaders above determine the foreign policy of Bush. Bush doesn't view himself as the commander in chief, but the private in chief who follows the orders of his advisers and campaign contributors. If he made the decisions, or thought about the impact these policies had on our future..I think he would be one of the most influential leaders of the world. but he only plays the organ, but doesn't write the music or even decide what to play on the organ.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
THUNDER HANDS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 08:30 AM
Response to Original message
3. well
if Bush could read, I'm sure he'd be disappointed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. Duh, I think that's why they have pictures with the article.
:eyes:

:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 08:30 AM
Response to Original message
4. This Is Interesting
Heroes & Pioneers
• Maher Arar, rendition survivor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
5. The mad marionette doesn't make the list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibDemAlways Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
6. What's interesting to me is the cover shot, clearly
Edited on Thu May-03-07 09:01 AM by LibDemAlways
designed to get people to pick this up at the newsstand on a whim. Obama is very prominently featured. Gore and Pelosi on there too.

The only "r" I see is Bloomberg. If they included chimp on the list, they'd almost certainly have to stick his face on the cover....which would have negatively impacted sales.

Leaving chimp off the list - and cover - was a huge and deliberate smackdown. Good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-26-07 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #6
71. And Obama is the focal point in the photo
Time wants to sell magazines so they must know the face that will work. :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RT_Fanatic Donating Member (162 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
7. Top 100?
He couldn't make the top 9 BILLION!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RT_Fanatic Donating Member (162 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
8. Top 100?
He couldn't make the top 9 BILLION!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
9. Are Stephen Colbert, Keith Olbermann and Jon Stewart on the list? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PegDAC Donating Member (906 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #9
40. No.
I was hoping, though. Brian Williams is, though,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #40
44. You think Time Magazine will be dead to him, or just on notice? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #9
43. Sadly, Tyra Banks and Oprah are on the list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rob H. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
11. Cheney's not on the list, either
Not really a surprise, though. Seems like his main function lately is to occasionally emerge from his undisclosed location to make fanciful claims on FoxNews about how well things are going in Iraq, anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
12. Putting Elizabeth II on the list seems a bit strange
Yes, she has some influence, and she's going to outlast Tony Blair; but Gordon Brown is about to become British PM, and undoubtedly has more influence. Whoever wins of Royal and Sarkozy will have more influence too - I suppose you could say that it's too dependent on the imminent outcome to say (but all the polls have put Sarkozy ahead).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #12
33. That's what I thought!
She is an important figurehead; but she is not 'influential' in the usual sense. As someone once said, royalty these days are highly-paid models for postage stamps.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
edbermac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
13. Wrong! He is the MOST INFLUENTIAL person in the world!
The biggest FUCK-UP around! After all wasn't Hitler named Time's 1938 Man Of The Year?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrat2thecore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
14. Silly
The list is for those who are positively influential OR negatively influential (Osama's on the list). He is definitely a major negative influential person. Just witness the veto. Publicity stunt for TIME - that's all. It's got people talking and that's all they wanted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wake.up.america Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #14
29. "Time" is out to lunch. I get the magazine for next to nothing. Only reason I read it,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psephos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-06-07 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #14
66. self-delete (wrong subthread)
Edited on Sun May-06-07 01:52 PM by Psephos
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CentralEuropeanDude Donating Member (115 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
15. Where is Putin?
oil+gas+pipelines+weapons+election+polonium isn't that enough?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dulcinea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
16. Boy George doesn't influence anything.
He just does what he's told. He's an empty suit. But, I'm not surprised to see Condi on the list; she's the most palatable of the whole bunch, to a certain segment of the population.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ferret Annica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #16
26. heehee, shame on you;
Boy George is a fairly competent performer. The CHimp at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue can't even pass muster as an organ grinder monkey. He deserves better then to have his good name tied in with this war criminal. ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StarryNite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #26
52. Yeah!
He was good in The Wedding Singer too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #16
35. In that case..
why didn't they list Puppetmaster Cheney?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Decruiter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #35
58. Or The Architect?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EstimatedProphet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
17. But of course, scumbucket Rice made the list
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sneakythomas Donating Member (89 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
18. I lost interest about forty years ago
When Time wrote up 25 women in place of their Person of the Year (I think it was still man of the year back then).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marnieworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
19. oooohhhh burn
unfortunately they are wrong. He doesn't deserve the power but he influences everyone. How many people will die in Iraq this year? The cost of gas? The Gulf Coast being completely forgotten? How many bills will he veto? How many subpoenas will they fight? How much money will be stolen from our treasury? Will they out another covert agent?

He influences tragically and therefore should be removed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
20. Osama made the list ahead of Bush? Oh snap!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #20
39. george is probably saying I thought I was greatest terrorist!!
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #39
42. He probably is!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
22. Actually, he should be #1 on the list.
I can't think of anyone who's had a greater impact on the world. Osama pales by comparison in the body count.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. I know Bush has certainly influenced me greatly.
I've never been more involved in politics in my life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
23. Who else thinks a dead guy made the list while Bush didn't?
I'm not convinced OBL is still alive. Too much intimate experience with kidney disease to think he's still around five and a half years after 9/11. Imagine being in the top 100 and not even being alive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-26-07 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #23
68. I also think he's probably dead
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fryguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
27. how many current US presidents have been left off the list in past years?
just wondering....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rcdean Donating Member (229 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
28. In the true sense of the word "Influential" this is absolutely correct.
Virtually nobody in the world buys that Bush knows what he's talking about any more. Chainknee either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
30. Ha, George Clooney is on the list!
take that Republics!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoFerret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #30
47. Who is George Clooney?
At least I have heard of GWBush and without doubt he has been influential. Unfortunately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #47
48. Clooney...
George Clooney is a Hollywood actor who is a handsome, articulate and intelligent liberal. There has been talk of him running for office in the future.

Granted, Bush should be #1 on the list, just like how Hitler should have been #1 back in 1939 or 1940.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thereismore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
31. Wasn't he* Man of the year once upon a time? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sequoia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. He sure was. TIME should do another with big ole X across the cover.
MAN OF THE YEAR....NOT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Decruiter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #32
57. X out like CNN did with Cheney
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laurab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #31
59. Yes, he was - that was when I cancelled my subscription
I wrote to tell them why, and they wrote back that the "Man of the Year" is the person who has influenced the world the most, for good or for evil, and mentioned that Hitler and Stalin had both been cover boys at one time. It was a nice explanation, but not enough to get me to renew my subscription!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
34. Bush should have been there as 'influential'
Influential for harm!

Similarly Putin; a very nasty man, but you can't deny that he's influential.

Surprising that Mayor Bloomberg is there when many leaders of countries are not. Perhaps Blair and Chirac are omitted because they're on their way out; but what about Michele Bachelet; Lula; Hugo Chavez (influential, whatever one thinks of him), Ahmadinejad (nasty but influential!); Mugabe (treble ditto!!!); even Prodi - possibly not that influential in himself, but he did, at least for the time being, end the disgusting career of Berlusconi.

And many others!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
37. oh wow, Pelosi is on the list, but bushie isn't too bad bushie
Edited on Thu May-03-07 01:36 PM by alyce douglas
Gore is on the cover also, of course he is influential!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geardaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
38. I hate *, but he should have been on the list.
Along with Deadeye Dick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bmbmd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
41. Well he is unable to influence either friend or foe-
but he can kill your ass dead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
45. Borat is on the list, and he's not!!!!
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
46. It says "100 Most Influential *People* in The World"
sorry, no chimps allowed.

See, no Bonzo, either. :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
49. This reflects the loss of the USA's influence worldwide.
Edited on Thu May-03-07 03:45 PM by tabasco
Bush has pushed us so far into debt that we wield far less economic influence.

Bush's war for corporate profits in Iraq has greatly decreased our military effectiveness as well.

Overall, Bush has greatly damaged our country's standing in the world community and done nothing good for the welfare of the American People, other than the corporate robber barons themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bicoastal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
50. ELIZABETH EDWARDS is on the list!
Congrats, Liz! You beat out W!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
51. WTF he belongs on that list
becasue unfortunately is probably the most influential person in the World. It's just another way they try to absolve him of responsibility for the mess he has made! :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #51
53. I agree. It doesn't make any sense why he isn't number one or two, let alone on the list, at all
"Influential" isn't necessarily a positive thing. But Bush is so influential (in a negative way), the whole country -- and much of the world -- has to adapt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
54. Well it wasn't the list of the worlds 100 biggest dumbasses was it
He'd get #1 on that one
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superconnected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
55. hahahaha! it does include obama and pelosi
and unfortunately condosleeza.

Bush can chain-ey aren't there though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
56. Oh, they should include him all right.
BUSH has been incredibly influential....

For Me.

He's influenced me to join the DU, fight for our rights, do EVERYTHING the opposite of this Clown.
Yeah, he's influential. Probably the most influential person on the Planet.

Just not what HE wanted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 12:42 AM
Response to Original message
60. This was likely
a purposeful slight made to him - to show his diminished influence on the American political landscape. Of course Bush is still influential in real terms, but no one cares at this point what he has to say. Bush is lame and irrelevant. He has credibility with few people.

Hey this from a magazine that made him "Person of the Year" twice...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
62. Bush is the OPPOSITE of influential
what he does has more to do with repelling people.

:headbang:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-05-07 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
63. Did anyone else notice the Time didn't even have the GUTS to print an actual Top 100 LIST this year?
Edited on Sat May-05-07 10:43 PM by Up2Late
Maybe I'm just not finding the right link to "TIME MAGAZINES TOP 100 Most Influential People in the World LIST," but it looks like they totally wimped out even on this and didn't give an actual LIST!

Here's the main link:

<http://www.time.com/time/specials/2007/time100>

But I don't see an actual LIST of 100 Names BY TIME MAGAZINE! The broke it down into 5 categories instead,

* ARTISTS & ENTERTAINERS
* LEADERS & REVOLUTIONARIES
* HEROES & PIONEERS
* SCIENTISTS & THINKERS
* BUILDERS & TITANS

...probably to keep from embarrassing "the president." Or has this always been a Reader Poll?

Then they added to the copout by passing the buck to the readers at these links:

<http://time-blog.com/talkback/2007/time100.php>


TALK BACK
Who's at the top of your list?

With so many different fields and individuals to choose from, we want to know which one of them matches your pick. Give us your thoughts on our list

Btw, lots of really stupid RW comments at this link like this one (I kid you not, I did NOT at the Quote marks to this one):

Posted by John in Liberal Connecticut
W

Say the words with me 'President' Bush. Your list is a joke, you exclude President Bush but you include Condolezza Rice and John Roberts. Both appointed by President Bush. I suppose Time doesn't have an anti President Bush agenda?
<http://time-blog.com/talkback/2007/time100.php>


Or this one:


TIME 100 Poll
Your Results

Take a look at the people who ended up at the top of the list according to your votes

<http://www.time.com/time/specials/2007/time100walkup/article/0,28804,1611030_1612457,00.html>

I can't wait to hear what Stephen Colbert says about coming in 2nd after RAIN (the Korean "King of Pop" music)!:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RockLacrosse20 Donating Member (23 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-05-07 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
64. to be honest, he should be on there
he should be on there because he influences a large amount of hate for the US throughout the world, and especially in Iraq, where the turmoil is very high, which will affect the US and the world for decades to come
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flaminbats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-06-07 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #64
65. I don't think Bush made that decision..
if Dick Cheney or Donald Rumsfeld had told Bush not to invade Iraq, he wouldn't have. The same is true on taxcuts..if Dennis Hastert or ROB PORTMAN had suggested taxcuts wouldn't stimulate the economy, we would probably have budget surpluses today! If STEPHEN JOHNSON had suggested we play an active part to slow down global warming, Bush would be making that a top priority.

Bush has shown very little leadership and influence over the policies of his administration and the Republican Party. the lack of any coherent strategy or direction has effected our planet the most, while President Bush's vision and values have not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psephos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-06-07 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
67. Okaaaaayyyyyy
Things must be worse at Time than I realized for them to green-light a silly publicity stunt. Does nothing for their reputation as a news organization, that's for sure.

Bush not an influence as big as Peter Akinola the archbishiop of Nigeria? Not as big as Liu Qi, chief of the Beijing Olympic Committee? Not as big as (careful, don't spray your milk out through your nose) JUSTIN TIMBERLAKE?

Tell that to the rest of the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pettypace Donating Member (695 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-26-07 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
69. W is becoming irrelevant
to borrow the WH's description of one James Carter.

And speaking of Mr bin Laden - he is the modern day bogeyman...what evidence is there of his existence since the interview he had with CNN in '96? Cannot believe how the aura of intrigue surrounding a person who exists only in video-tape form is so prevalent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lpbk2713 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-26-07 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
70. Nor did OxyRush Limbaugh make the list.



Alas, he's only influential among dittohead sheepies.

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:


Looks like their 15 minutes is up.

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 11:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC