How the hell did he manage that?
Our own dear Canadian Conrad Black gave it a shot, and we gave him a choice: Canadian citizenship or a British title. He went for the title. He no longer has Canadian citizenship.
What are you guys, a bunch of toadying colonials?
She has given the royal seal of approval to the Iraq fiasco by allowing her grandson to serve there.That's cute.
Can you imagine if one of Bush's offspring were in the US military (which I understand is an honourable thing to do, be in the US military) and her unit were to be deployed to Iraq, and he were to stop her from going? My, my; the shit that would fly.
QEII doesn't "allow" her grandson to do anything, any more than most people do. And if she were to try to
disallow anyone from doing anything at all, there's be a constitutional crisis such as hasn't been seen in quite some time. (She did disallow her sister from marrying her lover, for several sound reasons in the circumstances, but you'll notice that this sort of thing has gone out of style and favour, and not been tried, lately.)
You folks who live under an all-powerful executive just don't understand how we out here in the modern world do things at all, do you?
She had bush* for a state visit a couple of years ago.Gee. Quelle surprise. The head of one state hosted the head of another state ... who was visiting the state in question
on the invitation of the head of government. That will be Tony Blair, the elected guy, in case you're not clear on the concept.
What, you thought the Queen got to decide who visits the UK, and who visits her? Again -- the UK ain't the US. Hard to understand from inside US borders, I know.
She is just another right-wing politician.Oddly enough, she isn't a politician at all.
But it is damned funny how some people who are not affected in the least by her or anything she does can get so awfully riled up about her, based entirely on figments as their riledness is. Much more riled up than ... well, actually, the other people who are not affected in the least by her or anything she does: people in the countries of which she is titular head of state.
She is 'conferring ligitamacy' to bush* by her state visit and dinner with bush*.As head of state, she symbolizes the people of her country. As, lest you forget, does Bush; sorry about your bad choices, and all. But her duty is to the people of her country, to represent them. She doesn't get to snub the people of your country, no matter how distasteful she might find your head of state.
Haha:
http://www.saberingles.com.ar/reading/queen-elizabeth-life.html"English reading comprehension for ESL students" ... or ethnocentric silly loudmouths.
Elizabeth's political views are supposed to be less clear-cut (she has never said or done anything in public to reveal what they might be). She preserves cordial relations with politicians of all parties. It is believed that her favourite Prime Ministers have been Winston Churchill, Harold Macmillan and Harold Wilson. <Harold Wilson was a long-serving Old Labour Prime Minister, I doubt you'd know.> Her least favourite was undoubtedly Margaret Thatcher, whom she is said to "cordially dislike". She was thought to have very good relations with her current Prime Minister, Tony Blair, during the first years of his term in office, however, there has been mounting evidence in recent months that her relationship with Blair has hardened. She reportedly feels that he does not keep her informed well enough on affairs of state.
The only public issue on which the Queen makes her views known are those affecting the unity of the United Kingdom. ...
There are reports both ways on that Thatcher deal. Which kind of makes the point: the Queen's personal political opinions are carefully concealed and have nothing to do with her role as head of state. That role includes visiting and hosting other heads of state, whether she wants to or not and whether she likes them or not. And whether you like it or not.