Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Court Asked to Limit Lawyers at Guantánamo

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-26-07 12:28 PM
Original message
Court Asked to Limit Lawyers at Guantánamo
Source: New York Times

Court Asked to Limit Lawyers at Guantánamo
By WILLIAM GLABERSON
Published: April 26, 2007

The Justice Department has asked a federal appeals court to impose tighter restrictions on the hundreds of lawyers who represent detainees at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, and the request has become a central issue in a new legal battle over the administration’s detention policies.

Saying that visits by civilian lawyers and attorney-client mail have caused “intractable problems and threats to security at Guantánamo,” a Justice Department filing proposes new limits on the lawyers’ contact with their clients and access to evidence in their cases that would replace more expansive rules that have governed them since they began visiting Guantánamo detainees in large numbers in 2004.

The filing says the lawyers have caused unrest among the detainees and have improperly served as a conduit to the news media, assertions that have drawn angry responses from some of the lawyers.

The dispute is the latest and perhaps the most significant clash over the role of lawyers for the detainees. “There is no right on the part of counsel to access to detained aliens on a secure military base in a foreign country,” the Justice Department filing argued.




Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/26/washington/26gitmo.html?em&ex=1177732800&en=fee7bb8338d05f99&ei=5087%0A
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
meegbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-26-07 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. If it's such a slam-fucking-dunk that the detainees are guilty ...
why do they keep trying to stack the deck?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-26-07 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. More to the point, why are they languishing in this military concentration camp?
If they are guilty, convict them. If they are not, we are in gross violation of the United States Constitution and international law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meegbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-26-07 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. True true ...
I wish this would just end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-26-07 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. i read this last night and it angered me HUGH. limited access to evidence?
can you imagine this? This tells me their evidence as we've all suspected is shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-26-07 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
4. The only security problem is that the more lawyers, the more the truth
comes out. And that does not promote bush** criminal cabal security. Especially since Al Gonzo is the guy who's responsible.

He sure hates the rule of law, doesn't he? That and the Constitution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC