Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Second Male May Be Involved in VA Tech Massacre

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Cheney Killed Bambi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-16-07 10:54 PM
Original message
Second Male May Be Involved in VA Tech Massacre
Edited on Mon Apr-16-07 11:27 PM by flamingyouth
Source: ABC News

Right now, it's a breaking news header at http://abcnews.go.com/

POLICE SAY THERE MAY BE SOMEONE ELSE INVOLVED IN THE MASSACRE AT VA TECH, IN ADDITION TO THE DEAD SHOOTER

UPDATE

Campus police have identified a person of interest who is not currently in police custody. Police say the person of interest is a male who knew the female who was killed in the original double homicide at the West Ambler Johnston Hall dormitory. Flinchum also said he is not a student and that he knew the female who was killed in the original double homicide.


Read more: http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=3045574&page=1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-16-07 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's hard to believe any story at this point. n/t
MKJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-16-07 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. You mean this guy ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
idgiehkt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 02:53 AM
Response to Reply #2
12. thanks for posting that
I guess Chiang is who they are referring to. The new Richard Jewell. Poor man, they'll use him til they get their legal bases covered I guess. Wonder if they have enough plaintiffs for a class action suit here...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realisticphish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-16-07 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
3. at this point
i'm waiting a few days. too much media speculation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-16-07 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
4. The authorities were talking about that possibility early in the day
Edited on Mon Apr-16-07 11:01 PM by brentspeak
but they eventually changed their mind. It sounds like ABC is crying wolf to get an exciting headline.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-16-07 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
5. As much as I'd like to say they blew it by not shutting down the campus and saving 29 kids
My 20/20 hindsight, with absolutely no solid information of what was going on there today, is just as lame as anyone else's.

I would hope, next time something like this happens in such a setting, classes are halted and the kids are asked to get someplace secure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-16-07 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. It's very easy to say what they did after the first shooting was wrong
AFTER you've heard all about what transpired 2 hours later. If all fairness, I believe they did what they believed to be the right thing with the info they had at the time. It looked and sounded like a domestic violence case, and MOST OF THE TIME, those situations involve two people or at the most three when it's one person jealous of a romantic relationship so the jealous party kills the other two and then themselves.

That's a hugh campus, and when I heard about over 100 buildings, 25,000 students, more than 10,000 employees, and an unknown number of visitors, I can't imagine it would have been possible to notify EVERYONE that campus was on lockdown within the two hours between the shootings.

Unfortunately, there have always been crazy people in the world, and there always will be!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ObamaNationYes Donating Member (78 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-16-07 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. But if the Shooter from incident number 1 was not in custody,
IT was totally negligent not to lockdown. In addition, the first email to students alerted them that an incident has occurred but advised them to proceed with caution. You don't proceed at all if the shooter is not apprehended!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
idgiehkt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 02:57 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. exactly
and the shooter had already shot an unrelated party. They keep saying they had information leading them to believe he'd 'left campus'...but then when people ask them why they didn't notify students they talk about how it's a 'big campus'. It seems to me all the more reason to notify students if it's a great big campus and he may or may not have left, and it would take him a while to leave and they could be anywhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mithnanthy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 07:41 AM
Response to Reply #8
15. Is it just me?
Besides the tech approach of informing the students of a threat on a campus that size....does anyone remember megaphones? Couldn't they immediately have driven thru the campus announcing the alert?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. But that would cause a panic! Besides, if they did that and nothing came of it....
They'd look like fools..... ohhhh, wait.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JPZenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #8
21. Campus had card security system but...
I heard that the campus buildings have a security system that can be set to require the use of cards to enter a building. The cards are not used during most of the day. Theoretically, they could have acitivated the system. However, the shooter was a student, and would have been able to get in most buildings, unless they knew to turn off his individual card. In any case, it might have been a matter of students getting shot standing outside a building to use their cards, instead of being shot inside a building.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 07:57 AM
Response to Reply #5
16. Even if they locked down, I believe students still would have been killed
Just different kids.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bragi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 08:08 AM
Response to Reply #5
19. What about cities?
Personally, I see no reason why police would have suspected that the missing shooter in the first incident would proceed to kill more people two hours later. There is just no way to predict that.

And if you do think the campus should ahve been locked down after the first incident, then where exactly do you stop with this?

For example, if a gunman kills someone in Queens and then flees, should police lockdown the entire six boroughs because the shooter is still at large, and may turn into a mass murderer? If not, why not?

I think people are, as usual, looking for scapegoats to blame. If the massacre has any lessons to teach, it isn't about security provisions, it is more about dark problems deep within the soul of America.

- B
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-16-07 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
6. Remember when we had news and not speculation?
Is it really that hard to report what actually happened and what is known instead of what you think happened?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-16-07 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Actually, no, I never remember a time like that.
I don't remember the UT shooting, but being here in Austin I've heard enough stories. They thought there was more than one shooter much of the time. I do remember a sniper in a New Orleans Howard Johnson's, that I watched live coverage of as a kid. They reported multiple shooters. Turned out the sniper was throwing firecrackers to make it seem like more than one person.

At Columbine there were early reports of even greater casualties, and of four shooters. Some of the JFK conspiracy theories are still fueled by statements made in the confusion of the moment. Same with the crash at Roswell. After Katrina there were reports of hundreds of bodies in trees in Hancock County and/or floating in Lake Pontchartrain in Slidell. After OKC reports were that Middle Eastern men had been seen fleeing the scene--that still gets worked into CTs, too.

That's the way it is. Now, even if it turns out there was only one shooter, someone will start a web page claiming there was a plot and someone covered it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-16-07 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Where's the Fun in That?
You'd have to slog out to whatever godforsaken spot, ask everyone the same 5 questions, try to figure out who's lying, probably lay out good money for considerations (and no expense sheets anymore), and then put it into grammatical English so some dumb editor can shred it or can it.

There wasn't that much glory in it. It was hard work. That's why no one does it any more. Not even Woodward.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryOldDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 08:03 AM
Response to Reply #6
18. What gets me is...
...how some are trying to lay blame. Should have done this. Should have done that. There will be plenty of time for this. But not on the day of or the day after the tragedy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-16-07 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
10. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
camero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 06:08 AM
Response to Original message
14. There was a 2 hr 15 minute time frame between shootings, correct?
It's plausible that there would only be one shooter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryOldDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 08:01 AM
Response to Original message
17. Could it all be just a horrific, tragic coincidence? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC