Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Democrats Seek to Interview Gonzales Aide (Goodling)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-04-07 03:52 AM
Original message
Democrats Seek to Interview Gonzales Aide (Goodling)
Source: New York Times

By DAVID JOHNSTON
Published: April 4, 2007
WASHINGTON, April 3 — House Democrats on Tuesday requested a private interview with an aide to Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales who has asserted her constitutional right not to testify at a public hearing about the dismissals of United States attorneys.

Representative John Conyers Jr., a Michigan Democrat who is chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, sought the interview in a letter to a lawyer for the aide, Monica Goodling, who is on leave as the Justice Department’s liaison to the White House.

Ms. Goodling helped coordinate the dismissals with the White House. Her lawyer, John M. Dowd, informed House and Senate panels last week that she would not testify, citing her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination.

Mr. Conyers’s letter said that House lawyers wanted to question Ms. Goodling to evaluate the legality of her refusal to testify. It said she could not assert the privilege as a blanket justification not to appear.



Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/04/washington/04attorneys.html?_r=1&adxnnl=1&oref=slogin&adxnnlx=1175676636-H4wW0RTMJpKpzl2uxEa1TA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-04-07 03:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. "... has asserted her constitutional right ..."
Yet this hypocrite would deny such rights to others... by working for and propping up a criminal regime that engages in the denial of rights and by actively participating in the corruption of the justice department.

No doubt Goodling expects justice...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-04-07 07:29 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. If We Are VERY Lucky, and Persistent, She'll GET Justice
we really ought to import the guillotine and reserve its use for government officials convicted of violating the country....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-04-07 06:22 AM
Response to Original message
2. some backround info on ms goodling....she had no trail nor experience prior to hiring on DoJ
Edited on Wed Apr-04-07 06:24 AM by ElsewheresDaughter
Goodling's involvement in Attorneygate is not the only aspect of her role in the Bush administration that bears examination. Her membership in a cadre of 150 graduates of Pat Robertson's Regent University currently serving in the administration is another, equally revealing component of the White House's political program.

Goodling earned her law degree from Regent, an institution founded by Robertson "to produce Christian leaders who will make a difference, who will change the world." Helping to purge politically disloyal federal prosecutors is just one way Goodling has helped fulfill Robertson's revolutionary goals.

Regent has assiduously cultivated close ties to the administration and its Republican outriders. Gonzales's predecessor, John Ashcroft, is currently cooling his heels at Regent as the school's "Distinguished Professor of Law and Government." Christian right super-lawyer Jay Sekulow, who also teaches at Regent and shares a Washington office with Ashcroft, participated in regular briefings with the White House on court appointments. In 1998, he leased a private jet through Regent to fly Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia to speak at the school's 20th anniversary (Though Sekulow regularly argues cases before the Supreme Court, he apparently did not view hobnobbing with Scalia as an ethical breach).

When the Bush administration came into power, it looked to Regent for a reliable pool of well-groomed Republican ideologues eager to wage the culture war from the inside. The former dean of Regent's Robertson School of Government, Kay Coles James, was promptly installed as the Director of the Office of Personnel Management.

According to her bio, from 2001 to 2005, James was "President Bush's principal advisor in matters of personnel administration for the 1.8 million members of the Federal civil service." In that role, James rolled back the power of unions in the federal sector. Now that she's out of government, James is back among her Christian right allies, appearing frequently as a guest on James Dobson's Focus on the Family radio show.

Another Regent figure who impacted White House policy is Jim David, the current Assistant Dean for Administration in the Robertson School of Government. David was inserted in the Justice Department in 2003 as yet another sop to the Christian right; he served as deputy director of the department's Task Force for the Faith-Based & Community Initiative.

Since leaving the DoJ, David has spent a considerable portion of his spare time writing opinion pieces that appear on Regent's website. One of his most noteable screeds, penned in the wake of Hurricane Katrina, described a bright spot in the destruction of New Orleans. "We do not grieve, however, for the flooded and destroyed sex clubs that filled men with lust and degraded women," David wrote. "We do not miss the casinos that preyed upon individuals whose lack of self-control deprived families of needed food and shelter. We do not lament the destruction of voodoo stores prevalent in New Orleans before the flood."

At Regent, Goodling was drilled in the importance of unflinching loyalty to the Republican program. Once in the Justice Department, she proved an able cog in the Bush administration's political machine, meeting with Republican activists in 2006 to help plot the firing of New Mexico's prestigious US Attorney David Iglesias, a fellow Republican who "chafed" against administration initiatives.

But as scrutiny of her actions intensifies, the evangelical Goodling must resort to the 5th Amendment -- man's law -- to avoid breaking the biblical commandment against lying. Only the goodly and godly Pat Robertson could have prepared her to make such a decision.


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/max-blumenthal/monica-goodling-one-of-1_b_44588.html

<b>For anyone who thinks that the fundamentalist right are becoming obsolete or losing power just because the administration with whom they aligned is corrupt and malignant and rapidly becoming irrelevant; think again. It's an inside job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-04-07 06:29 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. and this on those 150 Pat Robertson law students working in the DoJ now...
Regent Law Students Enjoy Ice Cream plus Praise & Worship with Professor Ashcroft

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M789kRvbziM

Since I knew you'd be jealous of the fifty plus Regent Law students lucky enough to spend an evening with one of the "great men of our age", I'll give you John Ashcroft's greatest hit "Let the Eagle Soar" in the above YouTube clip. Unfortunately, I can't send ice cream through the internets since the tubes melt the stuff. Nor could I find a clip of John pounding his piano. The kids got "Great is They Faithfulness" yet I'd think surely this bunch required the obligatory "Onward Christian Soldiers". If civil liberties (do they teach at least some of those at Regent?) came up that evening I can imagine the "distinguished professor" immediately breaking into "I Surrender All." Any other Gospel song they'd just have to sing? Also, you know this group had vanilla yet any other flavors that might apply? Given how it's going for Regent grads right now I think Rocky Road would be appropriate for the next event. Peace ... or War!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-04-07 07:39 AM
Response to Original message
5. Justice Dept. official says she won't answer questions
WASHINGTON — A key Justice Department official who helped orchestrate the ouster of eight U.S. attorneys last year has again rebuffed requests to talk to congressional investigators about her role in the dismissals, with her lawyer saying Tuesday that she would not even agree to an informal interview with Capitol Hill Democrats.

Monica M. Goodling, who is on leave from her job as special counsel to Atty. Gen. Alberto R. Gonzales, rejected the House Judiciary Committee's request that she appear before panel investigators for a closed-door session about her involvement in the decisions to remove the federal prosecutors.

Democrats have expressed outrage over the firings, which they say raise questions about the influence of politics on prosecutions. E-mails and other documents released by the Justice Department show that Goodling, as the department's liaison to the White House, played a pivotal role in helping to arrange the terminations.

Her lawyer, John Dowd, wrote to the Senate and House judiciary committees last month, calling their investigations "politically charged" and saying his client would invoke her 5th Amendment right against self-incrimination if called to testify.

The usual solution to this sort of problem is "limited-immunity" I thought. And Congress CAN compel her to testify under oath ...

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/politics/la-na-usattys4apr04,1,4105047.story?coll=la-news-politics-national&track=crosspromo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-04-07 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Doesn't resistance to an informal meeting suggest something about the truth she is hiding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-04-07 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. I am guessing, but ...
I think this is sort of a bluff, hoping that Congress will not want to wade into the ensuing media circus. As a matter of law, as I understand it, they can make her talk, under oath; and for her to incur a presumption of something to hide in this way, I would expect to be part of some larger game. To summarize, they want to force Congress to crank up the legal machinery in order to:

1.) Delay
2.) Play the victim, as being bullied by an "out of control and partisan congressional witch hunt etc. etc."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-04-07 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
6. Leahy and Whitehouse also want answers from DO"J"
Edited on Wed Apr-04-07 08:33 AM by L. Coyote
In another letter on Tuesday, two Democratic senators, Patrick J. Leahy of Vermont and Sheldon Whitehouse of Rhode Island, asked Mr. Gonzales how the Justice Department would respond to issues stemming from Ms. Goodling’s refusal to testify....

That letter asked for an official point of contact at the Justice Department concerning Ms. Goodling.

“Who do we talk to at the Department of Justice?” the letter said. “The office of the Attorney General appears to be hopelessly conflicted.”

=============
This matter is fast devolving into a OK Corral type stand-off. What happens to the rule of law when the Department of "Justice" does not even respond to our democratic institutions? Is it still part of our presumed democracy?

The wider story summary, linking this and about 100 posts and articles:

Email-Gate FACTS: Felons, georgewbush.com, gwb43.com , et. al.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x523978
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 03:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC