Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Colombia opens probe into accord made with militias

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 02:30 PM
Original message
Colombia opens probe into accord made with militias
Source: Reuters

Colombia opens probe into accord made with militias
21 Mar 2007 00:58:05 GMT
Source: Reuters

BOGOTA, March 20 (Reuters) - Colombian prosecutors on Tuesday began a criminal probe of 20 leading figures, including five former congressmen and two ex-governors, for signing a 2001 document with illegal, right-wing paramilitaries.

The investigation extends a growing political scandal that follows the arrest of eight congressional allies of President Alvaro Uribe and his former security police chief on charges they conspired with the militia commanders.
(snip)

Colombia's right-wing paramilitaries were formed in the 1980s by rich ranchers looking for protection from guerrillas fighting in Latin America's longest insurgency. They are accused of massacres, kidnapping and drug-trafficking.
(snip)

Rights groups have long charged politicians colluded with the militia gangs. But revelations about their relationship are surfacing after the paramilitaries signed a 2003 peace deal promising them short jail terms for surrendering their arms and giving confessions.

Read more: http://mobile.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/N20400697.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. Colombia orders investigation into 20 politicians for secret pact with paramilitaries
Colombia orders investigation into 20 politicians for secret pact with paramilitaries
The Associated Press
Published: March 20, 2007

~snip~
The so-called Pact of Ralito was signed in 2001 by paramilitaries and elected officials, including former governors and congressmen, from the Caribbean coast. One of the signatories, pro-government Sen. Miguel de la Espriella, revealed its existence during a November newspaper interview.

The curtly worded covenant, named for the northern town of Santa Fe de Ralito near the ranch where it was signed, contains a list of innocuous-sounding goals like "rebuilding the motherland" on the basis of respect for property rights, national independence and the Constitution.

But the fact its existence was kept secret for so long has led many Colombians to conclude that the true aim of the pact was to pledge loyalty to the United Self-Defense Forces of Colombia, a paramilitary umbrella group, and their scheme to take over the country's institutions ahead of their eventual demobilization.

Chief federal prosecutor Mario Iguaran on Tuesday said he would investigate whether the former governors, mayors and congressmen — in meeting with the paramilitaries without government consent — were collaborating with an illegal armed group, which the U.S. government calls a terrorist organization.
(snip/...)

http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2007/03/20/america/LA-GEN-Colombia-Paramilitaries.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. Colombia orders investigation into paramilitary conspiracy charges
UPDATED: 13:17, March 21, 2007
Colombia orders investigation into paramilitary conspiracy charges

Colombia's Attorney General Mario Iguaran Arana on Tuesday summoned 21 politicians to testify on possible conspiracy charges relating to the July 2001 Rialito Agreement, an alleged meeting where leading politicians agreed to a paramilitary political program.

"Merely holding a secret meeting and the signing of a secret document with ... the United Self-Defense Forces of Colombia's chiefs of staff, is enough to implicate in an illegal conspiracy," Iguaran said.

Among those he has summoned are two former governors, six former congressmen, two former mayors, two ranchers, regional officers and a journalist.

The meeting, in Santa Fe de Rialito of the northwestern department of Cordoba, brought together paramilitary chiefs, political leaders and former ministers who are mostly linked to President Alvaro Uribe.
(snip/...)

http://english.people.com.cn/200703/21/eng20070321_359707.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. UCU: London protests at 84 trade unionists assassinated in Colombia during 2006
UCU: London protests at 84 trade unionists assassinated in Colombia during 2006
Tuesday, 20 Mar 2007 13:56

New figures released today by campaign group Justice for Colombia show that 84 trade unionists were murdered in Colombia in 2006. This marks a 20% increase on the number assassinated in 2005.

The announcement of the deaths was marked by a commemoration by senior British trade unionists at the Colombian embassy, including Tony Woodley (T&G), Derek Simpson (Amicus), Paul Kenny (GMB), Keith Sonnet (Unison) and Kay Carberry (TUC), as well as MPs, including Tony Lloyd, Chair of the Parliamentary Labour Party. A gathering of over 100 people held placards with the names of the assassinated trade unionists.

The figures, which are sourced from Colombian unions, show that teachers and agricultural workers were hit particularly hard: 40 of the 84 people killed were teachers and 11 were agricultural workers.

Although most of the culprits have never been identified, figures from the Colombian Commission of Jurists show that the vast majority of political assassinations were committed by the state and right-wing paramilitaries, often acting in collusion.

Few of the perpetrators of these crimes are ever prosecuted as murderers of trade unionists enjoy a huge degree of impunity in Colombia.

(snip/...)

http://www.politics.co.uk/press-releases/foreign-policy/south-and-central-america/south-and-central-america/ucu-london-protests-at-84-trade-unionists-assassinated-in-colombia-during-2006-$468934.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guy Whitey Corngood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
4. kick. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
5. U.S. Must Respect National Sovereignty
U.S. Must Respect National Sovereignty
By George Maynard
Issue date: 3/21/07 Section: Commentary

Why is it that the United States is widely disliked around the world? I'm not just talking about the way people from the Middle East feel about the United States - from Colombia to Japan to the Czech Republic, anti-American sentiment continues to mushroom across the globe. The simple reason is that our nation does not respect the sovereignty of other countries, regardless of their governmental systems.

Let's talk about Colombia first. The United States purports to be interested in helping our South American neighbor become a more developed and safe country. In order to do this, America has poured billions of dollars into Colombia's military and law enforcement agencies, and has also attempted to get Colombia to sign a free trade agreement. Sounds wonderful in theory, right? Wrong. The United States is pursuing free trade in South America explicitly for its own benefit, and spending money on the Colombian military does not make our nation any more secure, but causes plenty of insecurity and strife down there.

The American business lobby and government both argue that a free trade agreement will help spur the Colombian economy, but a free trade agreement with the United States would actually create more poverty in a country already crippled by it. Quite obviously, American corporations, regardless of industry, have a significant advantage over their few Colombian counterparts because they are well-established, extremely wealthy and have the backing of one of the world's most powerful governments. Thus, a free trade agreement will allow American corporations to flood the Colombian market with low-cost American goods, making it possible for American corporations to buy out their Colombian competition and basically give our country complete control over the Colombian economy. That doesn't seem like it would help Colombia develop.
(snip)

Basically, America courts the Colombian government with false promises of economic growth and security, but the average Colombian only sees changes for the worse - such as lower wages and crop destruction. Thus, the majority of Colombians dislike America because we are meddling in their own domestic affairs and causing negative change.
(snip/...)

http://media.www.dailycampus.com/media/storage/paper340/news/2007/03/21/Commentary/U.s-Must.Respect.National.Sovereignty-2784239.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bacchus39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. quite a bold assertion from a second semester engineering student
"Thus, the majority of Colombians dislike America because we are meddling in their own domestic affairs and causing negative change."

I surmise that he or she has never set foot in Colombia.

I would completely refute that declaration and make my own, that the majority of Colombians do in fact like the United States and the support the US gives them. I have never experienced any animosity towards me whatsoever in Colombia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donkeyotay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
6. The war on the poor. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
8. Colombia's Supreme Court orders 5 more politicians testify on ties to death squads
Colombia's Supreme Court orders 5 more politicians testify on ties to death squads
The Associated Press
Published: March 21, 2007

BOGOTA, Colombia: Colombia's Supreme Court on Wednesday ordered five more politicians to answer for their alleged ties to far-right death squads in Colombia's worst political scandal in decades.

The five are to testify on why they signed a letter of understanding with the United Self-defense Forces of Colombia, the illegal militia's national umbrella group, in 2001.

The four senators and a congressman are accused of conspiracy to commit a crime, said Alfredo Gomez, president of the criminal wing of the Supreme Court.

The politicians are all from Colombia's Caribbean coast, a longtime paramilitary stronghold.
(snip/...)

http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2007/03/21/america/LA-GEN-Colombia-Paramilitary-Scandal.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
9. We see country after country in Latin America rejecting US-dominated "free trade"
(global corporate piracy), World Bank/IMF indebtedness (the tool of the global corporate predators), and the murderous US "war on drugs" (war on peasants and lefists), as country after country has elected leftist (majorityist) governments that represent the real interests of their people. These US policies gravely harm the majority of people, rape the economies of poor countries--already devastated by decades of often US-backed fascist rule--and create grave social problems, driven by greed--vast numbers of people without enough food to eat, and deprived of land to grow it on, vast numbers of illiterate people, due to the irresponsibility of the rich and their resistance to fair taxes and social spending, a crisis in health care that makes our own look easy to solve, and, in some places, a culture of violence around drug trafficking and rightwing paramilitary crimes that is fed by the US billions in armaments flooding into the area.

But Latin America is experiencing a genuine peaceful, democratic, leftist revolution against their rich elites and their collusion with the US government and US and other global corporate predators. And I think that this revolution--which has achieved presidential electoral victories in Brazil, Argentina, Chile, Uruguay, Bolivia, Ecuador, Venezuela and Nicaragua, with big in-progress, leftist movements in Peru, Paraguay and Mexico (likely to win in the next election cycles)--is even beginning to touch rightwing dinosaurs like Colombia and Guatemala. The hallmark of this revolution is South American self-determination and regional cooperation. The first thing that it had to accomplish was solidarity on the issue of the Bush Junta's many attempts to interfere in Venezuela. When Bush visited several countries two weeks ago, he got lectured in public from Brazil to Mexico--in what appears to be common theme of both leftist and rightist governments, on the SOVEREIGNTY of Latin American countries. And in Colombia, Uribe, a rightist and recipient of billions in military largesse from Bush (compliments of US taxpayers), has been obliged to distance himself from a plot to assassinate Hugo Chavez and other nefarious rightwing paramilitary activities.

Frankly, I was astonished to hear Mexican President Felipe Calderon (rightist/corporatist) lecturing Bush on Venezuelan sovereignty. He is more than likely not sincere, but that he felt compelled to say this in public indicates the power of the Bolivarian revolution that started in Venezuela, and of which Chavez is a major spokesman. Simon Bolivar, the great revolutionary hero, dreamed of a "United States of South America." And the continent is swiftly headed toward a South American "Common Market," in which global corporate predators, such as those who are Bush's masters, have to compete on equal terms. This is WHY Bush visited South America--to try to break this up. But he failed, colossally, at least on the surface. Uruguay just rejected his "free trade" deal, obviously concluding that it is better off with Mercosur (the South American trade group--likely precursor of a S/A Common Market.) And he significantly failed in stirring up animosity to Chavez and Venezuela. Indeed, I think that he had conditions placed on him--conditions for the visit--by the presidents of Brazil and Uruguay, that he not bash Chavez in public. The president of Argentina (who described Chavez as "my brother"--in the context of Bushite/rightwing plots against Chavez), invited Chavez to hold a anti-Bush huge rally in Argentina during Bush's visit to Brazil/Uruguay.

I think that it is VERY likely that the people are astir in Colombia and Guatemala as well--because of the obvious, visible benefits of the Bolivarian revolution and Latin American regional cooperation. They can't help but see that some of the Venezuelan oil profits have been used to help bail Argentina out of World Bank debt, to the great benefit of the Argentinians and their economy--creating a healthy trading partner for every government in the region. They can't help but see school funding and medical care for the poor, and small business loans and grants, and land reform, blossoming in Venezuela, in a major government efforts to bootstrap the poor into a healthy economy. They can't help but see how vital it is to have clean elections, and to organize to elect people who truly represent them. It's working everywhere else. Why not in Colombia and Guatemala? THIS is why Uribe has to distance himself from the rightwing paramilitaries. And, apparently, he, too, sees the advantages of Bolivarianism--at least to the extent of "Latin America for Latin Americans". He can't help but see these advantages. They are apparent to all. And if Bolivarianism leads to prosperity for the region, Colombia, Guatemala and any who are still doing unfair "free trade" agreements with the US will be left out!

Chavez and the Bolivarian revolution are changing the face of politics in Latin America. And I think that socialist Evo Morales, the first indigenous president of Bolivia, sums it up best, when he said: "We want partners, not masters." He is not anti-capitalist, anti-US, or anti-corporate. He is pro-Bolivia. He wants a FAIR deal for Bolivia, in its negotiations with foreign corporations that wish to exploit Bolivia's oil, gas, minerals and other natural resources. He wants the workers to be protected. He wants the environment to be protected. He wants economic and social justice. Trade is not inimical to these things. Trade can enhance them (and often has throughout history). He wants FAIR trade.

This Bush trip was a watershed. US domination is over. And it is only a matter of time before the people of Colombia and Guatemala--and any other stragglers--insist that they, too, benefit from the rejection of US domination and its onerous "free trade" policies, and profit from their resources, labor, industry and creativity. The prosecutions of rightwing paramilitary drug traffickers and murderers in Colombia is the harbinger of this change, inside the few remaining US client states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 03:01 AM
Response to Original message
10. Film delves into the Colombian cocaine trade
Film delves into the Colombian cocaine trade
Jordan Vause
The Daily Evergreen
Published: 03/23/2007 00:00:00

Protecting the United States’ resources is a complicated task. Especially when protecting resources means indirectly maintaining the international cocaine trade while simultaneously funding a civil war in a foreign country.

In “Plan Colombia: Cashing in on the Drug War Failure,” two directors criticize America’s failed attempt to eradicate cocaine production in Colombia. The film focuses on the complexity of Colombia’s domestic issues, arguing many are caused by U.S. government intervention. The film notes that several years and billions of American taxpayer dollars later, Colombia still produces more cocaine than any other nation in the world.
(snip)

Interviews of various paramilitary groups, government-opposed guerrillas and the Colombian military give completely different viewpoints on the condition and future of the Colombian people.

In brief, the film argues that to maintain oil exports from Colombia, the U.S. funds the nation with weapons, military training and American tax dollars, at the expense of the Colombian people.
(snip/...)

http://www.dailyevergreen.com/story/21770
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC