Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Uruguay rejects Bush Trade agreement

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 01:06 PM
Original message
Uruguay rejects Bush Trade agreement
TeleSUR _ 18/03/07


Uruguay rejects Bush Trade agreement


The chancellor of Uruguay, Reinaldo Gargano, expressed on Saturday
his refusal at the possibility that his country would sign a Free Trade Aggreement(TLC)
with the United States, and has reinforced, however, to strengthen ties with the Mercosur.

"I am not in agreement that Uruguaygo forward with a Free Trade Agreement with the United States.
I am in favor of a better Mercosur; it is necessary for the integration in the region.
We have already obtained that Venezuela join and now we want Bolivia to also join", reported Gargano.

In declarations before that Ansa agency in Santiago, Chile,
the diplomat commented that the Uruguayan government
"is progressive and has its five fundamental programmatic axes,
and one of them is integration".>>>>snip

Translation page: http://internetchatradio.com/featured_articles/view/852

Original article in Spanish from telesur: http://www.telesurtv.net/secciones/noticias/nota/index.php?ckl=8484
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. Great news
Thanks so much for the translation IChing.

Uruguay will get so much more for her people from Mercosur. She has dodged a bullet here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BayCityProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Thank God!
They are helping to save people here and there!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
3. This is so important. Bush just went there last week, too, to wear them down.
Edited on Sun Mar-18-07 01:40 PM by Judi Lynn
Not a "Mission Accomplished," is it?



Superior information. It's absolutely splendid that Latin American countries are finding their voices and speaking right up against an administration they KNOW is vindictive and spiteful, and will get revenge any way it can. That takes real courage for any politician, knowing the Bush administration will simply start working with the opposition to make sure he doesn't get re-elected, as a lesson, and as a warning to others.

Selfless courage, concern for their countrires, for their countrymen/women and the future, all finally starting to come to life in Latin America. May life bless these new heroes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. Bravo for Uruguay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
5. jesus christ that is bad...
even uruguay does`t like him
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
6. Bush's mission to South America FAILED! Now he is toast, to the global corporate
predators who have been propping his junta up, and keeping him, Cheney and others out of prison.

I think that's what this means. I hope that's what this means. Our next problem: the Global Corporate Predators themselves, and the Corporate President they want to inflict upon us, and think that we will gratefully swallow as a relief from Bush fascism. (My guess, Hillary Clinton. Or possibly stealth candidate Sen. Christopher Dodd--the one who helped Tom Delay and Bob Ney engineer the electronic voting coup.)

When I heard Felipe Calderon, of all people (rightwing corporatist, stolen election, Mexico), lecturing Bush on the sovereignty of Latin American countries, and mentioning Venezuela in this context, my ears really perked up. What, even Calderon is on this theme?! I had already been surprised by Uribe in Colombia and something I'd read to the effect that he had refused to participate in Bushite plots against Hugo Chavez, and by some signs, in the recent huge scandal in Colombia about rightwing paramilitary murders and drug trafficking (including a plot to assassinate Chavez), that Uribe was trying to distance himself from these badass rightwing forces.

Here we had Lula da Silva (leftist, Brazil) lecturing Bush on Latin American sovereignty to his face, and Calderon (rightest, Mexico) doing the same thing, almost with the same language. SOMETHING was up. Clearly. What was it? A CONDITION for Bush's visit, that he not trash Chavez, Venezuela and the Bolivarian revolution? --a revolution that has inspired them all--left and right--with notions of Latin American self-determination? Perhaps even the right can now see the benefits of it. And the Bush junta and its rightwing allies in Venezuela (the oil elite) have been utterly disgraceful in their efforts to overturn Venezuelan democracy and its legitimate government, and utterly failed to do so, because of the commitment of Venezuelans to their Constitution, and their genuine approval of Chavez's policies.

It is the Bolivarian revolution which has made a South American or Latin American "Common Market" a thinkable notion. The Chavez government gave it a great boost by creating a fund--with its oil wealth--to bail Argentina, Bolivia and Ecuador out of World Bank/IMF debt. Argentina immediately began to recover from devastating exploitation--with all indicators now up--and has thus been made into a good trading partner for Brazil, Venezuela and others. Regional strength. Strength in numbers. Political and economic clout through cooperation (!), as the result of the far-thinking policies of a visionary leader like Chavez.

Now they ALL want self-determination and regional cooperation. Even Colombia (beneficiary of billions in military lard from the Bushites)!

Bush's mission was to bust all this up--to split Uruguay and Brazil off from the Andean democracies (Bolivia, Ecuador, Venezuela), with unknown bribes, bullying, threats and kneecap smashings behind the scenes. This announcement by Uruguay means that he failed. He failed to split them off. They see more benefit from the South American trade group, Mercosur (probably pre-cursor to a South American "Common Market")--even though they were feeling somewhat on the outs lately (a crack that Bush no doubt tried to widen)--than in corporate predation from the giant to the north. They are back in the fold! They are sticking with "Latin America for Latin Americans."

And this has major implications for the US global corporate predators who want to loot the oil, gas, minerals and other resources in the Andean democracies (also in Peru and Paraguay--where strong leftist movements are in progress, though they haven't won the presidencies yet). And this is why I think Bush and Cheney are in big, big trouble. Their effort to gain control of Iraqi oil has been a disaster. Their plans to grab Iranian oil are stymied (more by China, I think, that by our benighted Democratic Congress). They have NOT "delivered the goods" for their giant gangster bosses. And now they have failed in this last ditch effort to steal the oil and other resources out from under the people of Venezuela, Bolivia, Ecuador and their neighbors. It's not that they won't be able to get oil. But the medieval corporate lords at Exxon-Mobile et al will have to negotiate with peasants and leftists, and believers in democracy and constitutional government and social justice! They will have to pay their fair share of taxes--their obligation to the common good. They will have to obey environmental regulation. As Evo Morales (leftist, first indigenous president of Bolivia) has said: "We want partners, not masters."

Also, now, Lulu's visit to Uruguay, in anticipation of Bush's visit, becomes even more interesting. They were likely working all this out--the conditions they placed on Bush for his visit (no trashing of Chavez--which was so noticeable that even an AP reporter noticed it), and their resistance to "divide and conquer" and re-commitment to the concept of South American unity.

And I want to sing HALLELUJAH! Congratulations to President Vasquez and the other leaders of Uruguay--and to Latin America as a whole, and, above all, to Venezuela and Hugo Chavez!

Latin America's recovery from decades of brutal exploitation will now move like a wildfire across the continent. We are likely to see leftist (majorityist) governments in Peru and Paraguay, in the not too distant future--and maybe even in Colombia and Guatemala (and Mexico?). The model of cooperation, and Latin American integration, will, of course, be enormously beneficial to these societies, probably most of all to the vast poor populations, but to others as well. Their resources will benefit the people who live there. Education and all sorts of social improvement programs will begin to yield fruit--as they have in Venezuela. There is simply nothing like a democratic society, with a commitment to social justice, for creating a healthy climate for trade and all manner of innovative business ventures, large and small, with the talents of all citizens being utilized in trade, in the arts, in good government, in building infrastructure, and in addressing world crises like global warming.

And Bush is gone, my friends, gone! Oh, they may prop up the cardboard figure, for decorum's sake--I don't know that we can actually expect to see Bush in the orange suit that he so richly deserves--and of course they will try to replace him with a less fascist-seeming tool. But I think that the catastrophic failures of this regime, and the consequences for North Americans that North Americans hardly know of yet--such as a South American "Common Market"--are going to help us topple the Corporate Rulers. We may suffer hardship but it will be well worth it, in the end, to remake our country in its democratic tradition, not as this militaristic/corporate monster that the world now views with disgust and appalled wonder, but rather the great progressive democracy of innovators and traders and great organizers, and generous, tolerant souls that we were meant to be. The country that Jimmy Carter must have dreamed of, long ago, that got hijacked by Reagan fascism and sent down the wrong path. The country that we have all dreamt of. The country that our founders dreamt of. The country that, in some respects, still exists, below the radar of the corporate news monopolies, but in a state of oppression and disempowerment.

Viva la revolución!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Doctor. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-19-07 12:09 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. So very well illustrated.
Right to favorites.

-Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-19-07 02:56 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. Hope you're right about a country still existing beneath the heavy malignant darkness
choking the life out of the human part of the population every time right-wingers gain ascendancy.

It would be heavenly to discover there are still good, strong people left who are going to put this country back together one day and that the pestilence will leave us, finally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MasonJar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
7. We had to get rid of the robber barons and now the oil barons need to go.
We need to make it a weak and poor thing to be rich without using one's gains for the common good. In addition, we need to extoll the virtues of those who care about the environment and the poor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rydz777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
8. Bargaining chip
Uruguay was just using Bush's visit as a little kabuki theater in their own negotiations within Mercosur. They've never had any intention of swallowing a poison pill like NAFTA, and Bush was desperate to find a country that would let him visit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Well, yeah, there's that. Their own self-interest. And in thinking about all this,
last week, I was hoping that, if they (Brazil, Uruguay) have to get into a kneecapping game with the Bush Junta, they use their advantage over Bush for the ultimate benefit of their people and their region. I expected at least some cosmetic Bush ass-kissing, in return for something they wanted. I was surprised at how little there was. I was floored by Lulu's remarks to Bush about Latin American sovereignty. And when Calderon repeated them, I knew something was up. Something really big. Bush is being shut out.

Now, a politician like Calderon (rightwing corporatist, stolen election, basher of heads in Oaxaca) is angling for position. They all are, to some extent. That's what politics and diplomacy are all about. But Calderon is not one of the good guys. He's angling for the rich and the powerful. And he's got a major leftist rebellion on his hands in Mexico. And so, he is probably just posturing, with his Latin American sovereignty remarks. But what struck me about it is that he felt compelled to say it. Something big is going on, among Latin American leaders, on this issue, and he needed to score points about it, with the left in his own country, and among the other Latin American leaders, most of whom are now leftists. Vasquez (Uruguay) is more in the good guy category. He may have been playing some games with Brazil and Venezuela--and his timing of Uruguay's complaint about being shoved aside within Mercosur sure seemed aimed at Bush's visit--but he's also a leftist, and can't help but be at least somewhat sympathetic to the leftist revolution on his border (Argentina) and throughout the continent. He must want it to succeed. Surely he can see its benefits. And the question was, could Bush worsen the divide within Mercosur, and retard moves toward a South American "Common Market"? And what bribes or threats was he using--how potent were they? And, whatever Uruguay's motives were, and whatever Vasquez was thinking, Bush failed.

Bush wouldn't have gone on this mission if he hadn't been ordered to, and if those who control him hadn't thought it might succeed. THEY could likely see that Vasquez couldn't be bribed or bludgeoned into NAFTA, if it were true. They must have thought it was possible. But the upshot was, that Vasquez accomplished HIS purpose--an improved position within Mercosur. But they didn't accomplish theirs--or at least the part of their purpose that was visible to us distant observers. On the surface, Bush's Corporate Masters didn't get anything at all. They couldn't even get pals like Calderon or Uribe to bash Chavez. The Latin American leaders were united on this point (whatever ulterior motives some may have had). It appears that they are using Chavez and the Bolivarian revolution to assert their independence--a quite beneficial effect.

I do appreciate your viewpoint--a splash of cold water on my enthusiasm for what is going on in Latin America (and my thrill at the notion of Bush being gone). These are all politicians after all--Chavez included--a species that is not to be trusted, and that is not often altruistic or well-intended. But I think there is more going on than just NAFTA or not-NAFTA, or just positioning within Mercosur. I think there is a growing--and remarkable--consensus having to do with Latin American consciousness of itself as a region, and its potential power as a region, if Latin American countries stick together, espeically in dealing with the two big forces that so often have bullied them: the US, and global corporations/finance.

This is new. They have always been easy for these bully forces to "divide and conquer." They are no longer easy marks. And this is the result of the hard work and revolutionary struggle of MANY Latin Americans, over a good long period of time. The people of Latin America now have a majority of Latin American leaders who feel obliged to represent their interests in a genuine way, and several of these leaders are products of that long struggle. And it is affecting everyone--even leaders like Uribe and Calderon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bonito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-19-07 08:01 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. The powers that be have their man at the top
And as well know its not Bush, but Cheney.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Council_on_Foreign_Relations
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC