Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Judge strikes down Bush plan for snowmobiling in Yellowstone

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 11:01 PM
Original message
Judge strikes down Bush plan for snowmobiling in Yellowstone
Judge strikes down Bush plan for snowmobiling in Yellowstone

JACK SULLIVAN, Associated Press Writer Tuesday, December 16, 2003
(12-16) 19:44 PST WASHINGTON (AP) --

The National Park Service must revive a plan scrapped by the Bush administration to ban snowmobiles from Yellowstone and Grand Teton national parks, a federal judge ordered Tuesday.

U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan said the Bush administration should not have set aside a Clinton administration plan that would have banned snowmobiles in favor of mass-transit snow coaches, which would reduce pollution in the parks.

The administration dropped that plan and decided to instead allow limited snowmobiling to continue under rules that only allowed snowmobiles with quieter and less-polluting engines.

The Park Service had said the cleaner snowmobiles and limited entries would protect the park while allowing snowmobiling to continue, even though the earlier snow coach plan was the best way to protect the parks from pollution. (snip/...)

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/news/archive/2003/12/16/national2004EST0700.DTL


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Jack_Dawson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. Schweeeeet!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hyphenate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. Good
A judge that wasn't bought by this bAdministration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. selfish snowmobile riders
Yellowstone is a national park, not a playground. These snowmobile riders have no respect for nature or the environment. They care only about their own titilation from driving around like little boys and girls in motorized vehicles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nn2004 Donating Member (172 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-03 08:49 AM
Response to Reply #3
24. The selfish snowmobilers should take up XC sking
It's only about 70 miles round trip to old faithful from the hotel in West Yellowstone and any healthy person can easily make the trip in a day. Fun for the whole family and healthy too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VT70 Donating Member (132 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-03 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
32. I dunno
Edited on Wed Dec-17-03 04:36 PM by VT70
I don't think the government should ban snowmobiling here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 11:10 PM
Response to Original message
4. Yiippppeeeeee!
Let the games begin.

The fossil fuel fanatics will whine and snivel about this one. They think they have a god given right to roar around and make a lot of racket which certainly messes up the wilderness experience for others. They do not stay on the approved trails and end up putting extra stress on wildlife that is already stressed by the harsh winters of the area. They also get themselves in trouble with avalanches (sometimes caused by noise vibration) which means search and rescue personell have to take risks to save their sorry butts.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
5. Yesssss! I've waited so long for good news on this one...
Let's here it for the park, the animals, the environment (and for those cross country skiers) who can come in without destroying the park.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Military Brat Donating Member (999 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
6. A little bit of justice for the animals and the environment
Thank you, Judge Sullivan!

:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 11:36 PM
Response to Original message
7. Take THAT, Chimp-Boy!
Tape that court order it to a Sno-Cat and drive it right up your ASS!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_eh_N_eh_D_eh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
8. Snowmobiles have their advantages.
Canada has a long history of incidents that involved a snowmobile, thin ice, and a few too many Molsons. I tell you, those puppies weed out the gene pool like you wouldn't believe.

Yellowstone's a pretty dangerous place if you don't stick to the path, even in the winter. We're talking limitless possibilities to see Darwinism in action here, people. Let the snowmobilers in, and the place becomes a ten-million-acre Roach Motel for America's moronic yahoos.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burrowowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-03 01:28 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. Yes but
recovering all those snowmobiles and recycling them.
If scavangers get to eat the idiots, might be a good deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuckleB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-03 06:59 AM
Response to Reply #8
14. They'll go elsewhere.
And Yellowstone will be Yellowstone again. This snowmobile infestation only began in earnest in the late '80s, with a big push in the last decade.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maggrwaggr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-03 12:24 AM
Response to Original message
9. Cheney'll have to use snow-shoes to slaughter Elk in Yellowstone
and with his bad ticker he'll never make it.

pooooooor Cheney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-03 06:58 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. Staff will have to lead them by leash to where Dick can shoot them
Palsied, pathetic bastard that he is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snazzy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-03 12:53 AM
Response to Original message
10. Fed Judge: "...completely politically driven..."
Sullivan said the Park Service did not adequately explain the switch.

"Indeed, there is evidence in the record that there isn't an explanation for the change, and that the (study that led to the new rules) was completely politically driven and result oriented," he wrote.

Same AP now on Yahoo!:


http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=533&e=4&u=/ap/20031217/ap_on_go_pr_wh/yellowstone_snowmobiles
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-03 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #10
25. Judge Sullivan...
:yourock: :yourock: :yourock: :yourock:

:loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya:

:toast: :toast: :toast: :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuckleB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-03 06:58 AM
Response to Original message
12. Wow! So the Clinton Admin's study and careful research win out
over Bush's rush to please his donors?

I'm shocked! Happy, but shocked!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-03 07:14 AM
Response to Original message
15. Good for slience and peace of mind!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buddhamama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-03 07:42 AM
Response to Original message
16. All right !
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tlcandie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-03 07:49 AM
Response to Original message
17. Let's just hope it continues to stand .. will be appealed it seems :p
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nn2004 Donating Member (172 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-03 08:06 AM
Response to Original message
18. Not good enough
The snowcoaches pollute more than the new 4stroke snowmachines and should be banned too. As a matter of fact all the diesel motorhomes and the millions of other vehicles that pollute the park in the summer should be banned. Tear up the roads leading into the park and let people hike in if they want to see it.

Just because the park was created as a "pleasuring ground" for humans does not mean we have a right to destroy it with cars, trucks, busses, motorcycles, snowcoaches or any other destructive vehicle. Shut them ALL out and shut them out now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-03 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
19. Thank you...thank you...thank you
If the proliferation of snowmobiles around here is any indication of the noise, air, and aesthetic pollution that will be avoided in the National Parks, this is a very good thing!

I alsways thought the Bush idea was stupid. But, then again, I think most of his ideas are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nn2004 Donating Member (172 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-03 08:34 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. Why not push for a statewide ban on snowmobiles in Maine?
There are enough progressives in Maine to see it through. Ban the importing of snowmobile into the state or tax them at 1000% so that everyone that wants one will just give up and buy skis. Snowmobilers should not be allowed to totally destroy the environment. I doubt that there is a single Democrat that snowmobiles so it can only be a winning move.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RPG-7 Donating Member (168 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-03 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #21
29. that's so clever!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dusty64 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-03 08:20 AM
Response to Original message
20. Good.
Just another example that when it comes to environmental policy, NO industry is too small to get preferential treatment by our regime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-03 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
22. Get a load of this idiot
"But some local businessmen were upset by the ruling.

David McCray, who has a snowmobile rental company in West Yellowstone, said he had invested heavily in the cleaner snowmobiles because he thought his business needed them. But he said he never would have done so if the case had been decided earlier this fall.

"For the judge to throw this out at the 12th hour is unconscionable," he said."


No, what is unconscionable is the fact that prick bastard bush overturned the ban in the first place. McCray needs to adapt to survive. As if the world rotated for him only.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nn2004 Donating Member (172 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-03 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. Same thing goes for the snowcoach renters
The coaches pollute more than the newer and cleaner snowmobiles and should be eliminated right along with them. Let all the business owners rent skis and poles if they want to stay in business. If all the hotels and local business have to shut down because lazy people can't ski the 70 miles round trip to old faithful then so be it. I doubt that any of the residents and workers in West Yellowstone vote Democrat anyway so it's no big loss and they deserve what they get for not voting correctly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NickB79 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-03 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #23
28. Thats not fair to say
"If all the hotels and local business have to shut down because lazy people can't ski the 70 miles round trip to old faithful then so be it."

Many, many people who go to see the beauty of Yellowstone are physically incapable of going out on foot/showshoes/skis into the wilderness. People who are handicapped, people with small children, people who have injuries or heart disorders preventing them from hiking long distances, and especially the older generations. I can't see my grandparents hiking through Yellowstone or cross-country skiing without dropping from heartattacks. They're not lazy, but would enjoy seeing the beauty of nature there. I say keep the snowcoaches, but in fewer numbers and give preference to the groups mentioned above. Or, retrofit them to use electrical engines instead of gasoline or diesel. Anyway, the sheer numbers of snowmobiles would outdo any amount of pollution the far fewer numbers of snowcoaches could make. Even if you were to keep the more-polluting snowcoaches, you'd still have a net drop in pollution because there'd be so many fewer of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ochazuke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-03 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #22
27. Crybaby Capitalists
It's called RISK! That guy invested in a very risky business. What did he think would happen? Does he think the Bush people will rule the whole freaking world?

I suppose he'll sue the government to reimburse him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-03 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
26. wow some GOOD news today....thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
callous taoboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-03 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
30. Fuggin' G.W.
miserable sob always defends the assholes among us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VT70 Donating Member (132 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-03 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
31. This is lame
What the hell is so wrong with snowmobiling in Yellowstone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
govegan Donating Member (661 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-03 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. From the Wilderness Society
Yellowstone National Park in summer is a masterwork. Yellowstone in winter is a miracle. Snow drapes lodgepole pines and capes bison as they forage in the vapor from thermal pools. That familiar Yellowstone image is a winter photographic staple. But it is giving way to another: rangers, also barely visible but obscured in snowmobile exhaust, not water vapor, and wearing gas masks as they tend entrance stations. And bison are as apt to be seen fleeing from snowmobiles as going about their serious winter business of husbanding the energy to make it to spring. That is America's greatest national park today.

"... a national treasure"
"Americans have a national treasure in the Yellowstone Park and they should guard it jealously. Nature has made her wildest patterns here, has brought the boiling waters from her greatest depths to the peaks which bear eternal snow, and set her masterpiece with pools like jewels."
- Frederick Remington, after visiting Yellowstone in 1893

The National Park Service tells us snowmobiles cause problems in Yellowstone: blue haze lingers over Old Faithful; Park Service rangers don respirators, but only to breathe; bison and other wildlife flee snowmobiles.

Before it unveiled its new snowmobile management proposal in November 2002, the National Park Service studied, once again, areas of particular concern. They included air quality, visibility, soundscapes, health and safety, impacts on wildlife and visitor experience. The study found that in virtually all areas, snowmobile use damages the park. The agency says that visibility will be impaired around Old Faithful, visitors will hear more noise, and "employees and visitors who are susceptible to respiratory problems would likely be affected." Science implicates human health, of both visitors and park employees, in another way: snowmobile use spreads poisons, benzene and carbon monoxide among them, through both Yellowstone and Grand Teton National Parks. The list goes on; so will the damage it catalogs.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 04:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC