Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Tapes Reveal Libby Speaks Carefully About Cheney

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 01:53 PM
Original message
Tapes Reveal Libby Speaks Carefully About Cheney

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/02/07/AR2007020701040.html

Tapes Reveal Libby Speaks Carefully About Cheney
By Amy Goldstein and Carol D. Leonnig
Washington Post Staff Writers
Wednesday, February 7, 2007; 1:08 PM

During two sessions before a federal grand jury, Special Counsel Patrick J. Fitzgerald pressed I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby--unsuccessfully--to reveal that Vice President Cheney shared responsibility for the leak of a CIA officer's identity, according to audiotapes played this morning in Libby's perjury trial.

...

At one point, Fitzgerald asked Libby if he had conferred with Cheney about whether to mention Plame as Libby carried out the vice president's directive to contact reporters in an effort to debunk Wilson's criticism of the administration's war policy in the summer of 2003. Libby replied that sometime after columnist Robert D. Novak disclosed Plame's name on July 14, 2003, "I may have asked you know, 'Do you want me to refer to that?' "

Immediately, though, Libby backtracked, telling the grand jury: "I have recollections of talking to the vice president at times about, does he want me to share some point of fact with reporters . . . I don't recall specifically having a conversation with him . . . about sharing--about Wilson's wife. But it's possible. I just don't recall it."

...

He said he twice went privately to the vice president to ask whether Cheney wanted to know all the details of his conversations with reporters about Wilson and Wilson's wife in late June and early July.

"I would have been happy to unburden myself of it," Libby testified. "He didn't want to hear it . . . I have no problem telling him what happened."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mitchleary Donating Member (271 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well
Edited on Wed Feb-07-07 02:18 PM by mitchleary
you never know when you are going to have the urge to commit suicide, or have some kind of accident...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. What a good little soldier.
Think he'll stay that loyal when none of them come to visit him in prison?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
youngdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. A deal is firmly in place
He takes the fall, and so long as he doesn't take Cheney, Bush or Rove down with him, tBush will pardon him (along with every other neo-con war criminal) on the way out in Jan 09.


I'd stake lefty on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
4. Was He Feeling "All Choked Up" When Talking About Cheney?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Floyd53 Donating Member (39 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 12:12 AM
Response to Original message
5. So what, who cares, what does it change?
Libby spills the beans - period - end of story. Nothing is going to happen, nothing ever does. It's just a bunch of hoopla about how bad, how wrong, how illegal, how stupid Bush and company is. So what, we've known that from day one. I'm thinking there isn't going to be consequences for Bush, ever. Maybe that's where it's at. Maybe our mistake was letting this little runt get into office in the first place and now we are screw forever. How about that? Maybe the United States has made a change, a sea change. No going back. Maybe the Constitution is just an interesting part of our history and it's been replace by a The Decider. We are no longer defined by our Constitution. Those laws are made to keep us in line, not protect us. All of us are slaves of a system gone haywire. So now what? Most people are like me, scared, fearful, unable to stand up in public and show the world how angry I am. I'm a fool and I know it. I need the safety and security of my cozy little house, in my cozy little world, with my cozy little family. I retire soon and I'm tired.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC