Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hubble's primary camera shuts down

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Placebo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-29-07 08:15 PM
Original message
Hubble's primary camera shuts down


The primary camera on the Hubble Space Telescope has shut down and is likely to be only marginally restored,
NASA said Monday, a collapse one astronomer called "a great loss."

While other scientific work can still be done by the aging observatory, the unit that failed, the Advanced Camera for Surveys, is the one most scientists depend upon. NASA scientists say they expect to be able to restore just one-third of its observation ability, probably by mid-February.

"We're not optimistic at all" about returning it to full function, said Dave Leckrone, a senior scientist on the Hubble at Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt.

However, all is not lost. Next year NASA plans to send space shuttle astronauts to upgrade the popular telescope in a mission to install new instruments that will actually exceed the capabilities of the current system.

More...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-29-07 08:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. Meanwhile, the Busheviks don't blink at spending half a trillion in Iraq
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-29-07 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. As long as the upgrade mission actually does its thing.
It's an old device. These things do break.

Godspeed, astronauts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Placebo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-29-07 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Godspeed indeed.
:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-29-07 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. Oh, damn. The Hubbel has been the single best investment in science
this country has ever made.

Y'all may counter with other scientific endeavors, and I'll not argue any of them. But the Big H has indeed been damn valuable.

Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-29-07 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Amen, Redstone.
Btw, NASA, along with many other agencies, is running on a contingency resolution budget which is only paying for salaries right now. This government is in dire shape.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-29-07 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Damn shame. Half a TRILLION for the stupid fucking war; not a dime for science.
Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1620rock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-29-07 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Yes, the Hubble is right up there with the lunar landings..
...for exciting science. The mind soars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 12:43 AM
Response to Reply #7
15. sarcasm?!

I'll take insightful science over "exciting" science any day. You've greatly underestimated Hubble.

And your background for judging this is? (Two can play this sarcasm game.)




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FogerRox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-29-07 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
8. Come on FIX HER UP, ANd go back and rec this. please
KNR
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-29-07 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
9. I hope they can repair the Hubble
When I saw for the first time the pictures it sent back I finally understood the potential of this new technology we possess. Simply breathtaking images from space, what a miracle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Az_lefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-29-07 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Me too. The hubble is an awesome scientific instrument.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shireen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-29-07 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. yes and no
The camera that failed, Advanced Camera for Surveys or ACS, is generally the most powerful camera on Hubble. From what engineers know about the problem so far, it's unlikely that ACS will ever return to service. It's a very major loss for Hubble science.

Another camera, Wide Field and Planetary Camera 2 (WFPC2) is still operational. It does not have ACS's high resolution and large field of view. But some Hubble science can continue to be done with it. There's also the Near-Infrared Camera and Multi-Object Spectrograph (NICMOS) that does imaging in the near-infrared wavelengths.

The next servicing mission is tentatively scheduled for September 11 2008 (9/11, who picked that date?!). Two new instruments will be installed, Wide Field Camera 3 (WFC3), and the Cosmic Origins Spectrograph (COS). Astronauts will remove WFPC2 and replace it with WFC3. (They can't remove ACS and put WFC3 in its place because the shapes of their instrument bays are very different.) There will be other important work done such as installing new gyroscopes that allow Hubble to slew from target to target, batteries, a fine guidance sensor (FGS, one of three used for locking on targets), and a bunch of other things.

Lots more info at http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/shuttle/shuttlemissions/hst_sm4/



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phredicles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-29-07 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
10. Is it true that the Shrub admin. would like to shitcan the Hubble
because of the inconvenient evidence it keeps yielding about the universe being more than 6,000 years old?

Anyway, I'll give the thread a rec.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-29-07 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. They're afraid we'll get Jesus's attention.
And he'll come back and kick their asses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Placebo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-29-07 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Ain't that the sad truth.
:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undergroundpanther Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 01:06 AM
Response to Original message
16. Where is Mc Naught?
Has it got out of sun range yet? There have been some flares... So what's going on?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC