Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Avionics Software Outsourcing Deal Draws Fire (Bad Idea)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-29-07 03:28 PM
Original message
Avionics Software Outsourcing Deal Draws Fire (Bad Idea)
The deal is raising flags among offshoring opponents, who question whether mission-critical software should be written by international teams.

Jan 29, 2007 09:00 AM

Washington -- An alliance between a U.S. embedded-software services company and an Indian-based partner to outsource avionics software development is raising flags among offshoring opponents, who question whether mission-critical software should be written by international teams.

Avista Inc. (Platteville, Wis.) and Silver Software (Malmesbury, England) last week announced an alliance they said would allow aircraft makers and avionics companies to shift software development offshore while retaining U.S.-based project management.

The partnership will "provide significant cost benefits" to aircraft makers, said Avista president James Schneller. The larger the project, the greater the savings, he added.

Norm Matloff, a computer science professor at the University of California at Davis and a leading U.S. opponent of offshoring, said that overseas development of avionics software is a bad idea. He also questioned whether the alliance between Avista and Silver Software, which has a software development facility in Bengaluru, India, would actually result in cost savings. While aircraft makers and avionics contractors might benefit, Matloff said, "the software costs amount to a minuscule portion of the average airline ticket."

http://www.informationweek.com/outsourcing/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=197001129


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-29-07 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. "whether mission-critical software should be written by international teams"
Um, don't they use Windows to run some of the more modern naval warships (the so-called 'Smart Ships')? Do they think that Windows is written entirely in Redmond? Or is it the case that since it's 'COTS' (Commercial Off The Shelf) software, it doesn't merit examination?

:shrug:

We're so vulnerable on this, we don't even know how vulnerable we are...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-29-07 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. ...
"We're so vulnerable on this, we don't even know how vulnerable we are..."

You're so right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nebenaube Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #1
10. oh..
oh man, you've got to be kidding, right, tell me you are kidding? please tell me that our defense does not hinge on microsoft having gotten it right... please, please, please.... <stack overflow> abort, ignore, retry? BOOOOOOOOM!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. The last I heard about that particular program was 1998
...when someone inadvertently entered a 'zero' in a text entry field, and crashed the ship's computer with a 'divide-by-zero' error (and disabled the ship - I believe it had to be towed back in):
http://www.gcn.com/print/17_17/33727-1.html
http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,13987,00.html

Whoops!

They use commercial (COTS) software all throughout every level of government, however. I don't believe any of it is really 'checked out' as long as it theoretically fulfills the contractual software specifications. I know for a fact they use all sorts of proprietary software they don't have the source code for.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-29-07 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. It's insane.
Kinda like our companies running factories in Germany during the War. India's a pal NOW. Five, ten years, don't count on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hogwyld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-29-07 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. That light at the end of the tunnel
is NOT the end of the tunnel...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-29-07 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Sometimes it's just an oncoming train.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-29-07 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Its military and security not safe
but the NWO doesn't care if they destroy America

thats the purpose
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-29-07 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
7. Avista Inc was acquired by Esterline-here's a datadump on them
James Schneller Jr. is the founder, President and GM of Avista Inc
Avista Inc Executive Staff
http://www.avistainc.com/about/staff.stm

Avista Inc Amended&Restated it's Articles of Incorporation in December 2003 when it was acquired by Esterline
http://sec.edgar-online.com/2003/12/18/0000891020-03-002869/Section125.asp

James Schneller Jr. and other Avista Inc. people contribute to Republican candidates
http://www.city-data.com/elec/elec-PLATTEVILLE-WI.html

Esterline has many links to some controversial political and arms deals especially in the UK (including BAE Systems:Esterline acquired BAE's Electronic Passive Expendables Division in August 2002)
Esterline factsheet
http://www.esterline.com/profile/factsheet.stm

Esterline Directors and Officers
http://www.esterline.com/profile/directors_officers.stm

Esterline holdings include the world's leader in combustible ordnance and a lot of other "products" an Esterline worker was killed by an explosion at it's UK Wallop Defence Systems facility last year
http://seattle.bizjournals.com/seattle/stories/2006/06/26/daily9.html

I can't help about wondering if there is a connection between Esterline and the late CIA "dirty warrior" Jacob D. Esterline.

Maybe someone else could find out some things about these people since it is known that "commissions" from BAE have helped support terrorists including OBL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChromeFoundry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-29-07 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
8. I don't think I ever want to fly again...
I've seen how poorly written many of the offshored projects are. I know this because I have had to clean it up, again, this morning!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-29-07 11:50 PM
Response to Original message
9. It's entirely a bad idea yet it keeps HOMELAND (tm) safe and financially sound. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC