Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Warner: No compromise seen on Iraq resolutions

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-26-07 02:24 AM
Original message
Warner: No compromise seen on Iraq resolutions
No compromise seen on Iraq resolutions

By ANNE FLAHERTY, Associated Press Writer 35 minutes ago

WASHINGTON -The leader of a bipartisan effort to rebuke President Bush's Iraq strategy said Thursday he would not strike a compromise with a harsher Democratic resolution the Senate will debate next week.

Sen. John Warner, R-Va., former chairman of the Armed Services Committee, said he won't negotiate with Democrats to develop a single proposal on Iraq. His comments _ along with the emergence of other resolutions the Senate might consider _ underscored how a Congress largely against Bush's proposal to send more troops to Iraq remained divided over what to do about it.

Warner's decision bolsters chances that his resolution will be the one to win final Senate approval. Democrats are expected to vote for his proposal if their measure fails, and several Republicans said they prefer Warner's approach because it is less divisive.

His decision to avoid bargaining also decreases the odds that a single resolution would emerge that would garner a strong, bipartisan vote reproaching Bush's plan, which the White House hopes to avoid.

<snip>

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070126/ap_on_go_co/us_iraq

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Jawja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-26-07 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. In other words,
Warner's resolution has no teeth. A dog and pony show. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-26-07 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. 21,000 troops is not an escalation - it is a "decision" in Warner's version n/t
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-26-07 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. All are non-binding
They squawk about bi-partisanship but when given an opportunity they become defiant and say my way only....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-26-07 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. guess he doesn't want to go up against the "Decision-maker," eh?
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 02:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC