Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Libby a Scapegoat, His Lawyer Tells Jurors

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
AikidoSoul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 02:52 PM
Original message
Libby a Scapegoat, His Lawyer Tells Jurors


http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/23/washington/23cnd-libby.html?hp&ex=1169614800&en=a4c42e9196fba8af&ei=5094&partner=homepage

Libby a Scapegoat, His Lawyer Tells Jurors

By NEIL A. LEWIS

Published: January 23, 2007

WASHINGTON, Jan. 23 — The chief defense lawyer for I. Lewis Libby Jr. told a jury today that his client was innocent of perjury and obstruction of justice charges and that White House officials had sought to make him a scapegoat in the investigation of the leak of a C.I.A. operative’s name to protect Karl Rove, the White House deputy chief of staff

In his opening statement, Theodore V. Wells Jr., said that the unnamed White House officials wanted to protect Mr. Rove because they believed his survival as President Bush’s political adviser was crucial to saving the Republican Party.

“Scooter Libby was to be sacrificed,” Mr. Wells told the jury on the trial’s first day, using the nickname of Mr. Libby, who was Vice President Dick Cheney’s chief of staff. It was important to keep Mr. Rove out of trouble because, Mr. Wells said, he was the “lifeblood” of the president’s political operation and “was most responsible for seeing the Republican Party stayed in office. He had to be protected.”

Mr. Rove, who has not been charged, has acknowledged having been one of the sources for a July 14 column by Robert Novak that first disclosed the identity of Valerie Plame as a Central Intelligence Agency officer.

Mr. Wells’s remarks followed the opening statement of the chief prosecutor, Patrick J. Fitzgerald, who told the jury that the evidence was clear that Mr. Libby knowingly lied under oath about his conversations with three reporters about Ms. Plame, who is also known by her married name, Valerie Wilson.

Mr. Fitzgerald used charts to demonstrate that Mr. Libby had several conversations with various administration officials in June and July of 2003 in which he learned that Ms. Wilson was the wife of Joseph C. Wilson IV, a former ambassador who had made a trip to Africa to check on reports that Iraq had tried to buy uranium for nuclear weapons.

Mr. Fitzgerald had his own dramatic moment of the day: he played the audio tapes of Mr. Libby’s testimony on two occasions before a grand jury.

<<<<<<<SNIP>>>>>>>


FAIR USE NOTICE: This may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a "fair use" of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior general interest in receiving similar information for research and educational purposes. For more information on this topic go to: http://www.law.Cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html


"And ye shall know the truth and the truth shall set you free." Gospel of John
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. K&R
can't think of a comment besides this is going to be fun watching them all turn on each other.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. Wonder why the NYT never identifies what the I in I. Lewis Libby stands for?
Just idle speculation. Seems like at some point we get to read what someone's full name is. Especially grown men who are called Scooter. I mean, I know what it is (Irving), but I'll bet a lot of people don't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. Is that why he exposed a CIA agent? Is that why he lies about it?
Is that why he obstructed the investigation? :cry: me a river for poor Liddle scooter. Him not want to be a scapegoat.

Hey scooter you should have picked your friends better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
speedoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. Seems like a desperate tactic for Scooter's lawyers.
Designed to confuse the jurors with speculation about WH intrigue (that is irrelevant to the charges against Libby)?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tuttle Donating Member (919 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
5. so delicious
watching "conservatives" devour each other... will this be televised?

What shall we tell the children?

Tut-tut
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hav Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
6. .
I agree with the DUer who said that this is only about raising doubt for the jury. If there is enough doubt about his guilt, then I guess the jury will come to the decision that he is not guilty.
So I'm glad that there is finally a trial about this matter but I fear that in the end, no one of these assholes will end in prison.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Casablanca Donating Member (549 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. I doubt that it would raise any doubts.
People aren't generally inclined to come to the aid of scapegoats, especially ones with a track record of complicity with the people scapegoating them. The fact that they're even considering the "most trodden-upon rattlesnake in the pit" defense signals a lot of desperation on their part.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tansy_Gold Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
7. If he didn't want to be a scapegoat, why didn't he just
tell the truth in the first place?

Or am I missing something here?

1. Cheney tells Scooter, "You're takin' one for the Rovester."
2. Scooter tells Cheney, "No I ain't!"
3. ???Scooter lies to protect Rove.

Don't know about you, but that makes no effing sense to me at all.


TG



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Casablanca Donating Member (549 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
8. Libby the infidel - standing up for himself without permission.
How dare he.

Moral: The higher up a person is in a chain of corruption, the worse they get whacked when they finally have to disobey orders.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xxqqqzme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
10. ah, yes, the old 'scapegoat' defense
you're in deep, freep do do when you use that one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
11. Whew! Good thing Rove was spared to keep the Republican party in office.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
12. May they all go down with him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SheepyMcSheepster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 12:46 AM
Response to Original message
13. Kick!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 12:56 AM
Response to Original message
14. Too bad Fitz couldn't have busted Rove...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC