Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Army to Apologize for Letters

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-06-07 12:21 AM
Original message
Army to Apologize for Letters
January 5, 2007

WASHINGTON -- The Army said Friday it would apologize to the families of about 275 officers killed or wounded in action who were mistakenly sent letters urging them to return to active duty.

The letters were sent a few days after Christmas to more than 5,100 Army officers who had recently left the service. Included were letters to about 75 officers killed in action and about 200 wounded in action. The 75 represent more than one-third of all Army officers who have died in Iraq since the war began.

"Army personnel officials are contacting those officers' families now to personally apologize for erroneously sending the letters," the Army said in a brief news release issued Friday night.

The Army did not say how or when the mistake was discovered. It said the database normally used for such correspondence with former officers had been "thoroughly reviewed" to remove the names of wounded or dead soldiers.

http://www.newsday.com/news/politics/wire/sns-ap-army-letters-to-deceased,0,5944732.story?coll=sns-ap-politics-headlines

Makes you wonder how accurate those KIA numbers are?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-06-07 12:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. Even the dead can't get out of the Army's Endless War
The Pentagon is being run by incompetents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-06-07 01:26 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. Indeed, I am so sad for these families, yet this makes me laugh so hard, sardonically.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Bacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 08:26 AM
Response to Reply #1
33. Did they send a letter to George Romero, too?
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
silvermachine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #33
39. Maybe...
...they sent one to Joe Dante. Remember "Homecoming" on Showtime's Masters of Horror series?

http://www.villagevoice.com/film/0548,lim,70455,20.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-06-07 12:29 AM
Response to Original message
2. Mother of fucking pearl....what a disgraceful mistake. Who the hell is vetting this shit???
Edited on Sat Jan-06-07 12:32 AM by MADem
Did they use Rummy's old autopen with cheery green ink to sign the letters? Or did the Gates autopen take the rap?

Obviously, the database was NOT "thoroughly reviewed" before this cockup, else it would not have happened. You have to wonder who is running decedent affairs over at the Pentagon. This error is simply unacceptable. There are protocols in place that should be checked off, one by one, when a servicemember dies. The protocols apply during war and peacetime, and they are in place so shit like this does not happen.

This is simply more evidence of the declining quality of our forces. It's criminal....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-06-07 01:30 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. they're short-handed...
"Here's your rifle, son."

"But SIR, I'm a FILE CLERK!"



:cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-06-07 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. So many of the folks at decedent affairs are civilian, though; so here is what I wonder
You know how there was a litmus test (registered GOP, party loyalist) to work as a contractor in the Green Zone? I'm wondering if they are pushing out a lot of the Democrats (many of them black) who work at the Pentagon in that shop and others (to include the assorted database shops)...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-07-07 08:44 AM
Response to Reply #7
31. they're short-handed...A fantasy
"Here's your rifles, girls."


"But SIR, We're Jenna & Barbara BUSH!"

"Tough shit girls get going."

:rofl::rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #31
35. LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-06-07 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. I bet they stopped their paychecks
as soon as they died.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-06-07 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Darn right--that's the FIRST thing on the checklist! NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LanternWaste Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
45. I don't know if this is really new or not...
I don't know if this is really new or not.

One of my granmother's 'cherished' possessions was a KIA telegram from the War Dept. dated 1943. It notified her that my grandad had been killed in Sicily.

Only problem was, I went to his real funeral last January.



Granted, there were a LOT more servicemembers in WWII. And these days, I'm sure there's a super-dooper-secret Xcel spreadsheet they keep this stuff on that should minimize errors...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-06-07 12:33 AM
Response to Original message
3. They offered more education $ or what
They were sent a few days after Xmas? W is one big screw up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-06-07 12:44 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. I wonder about it all
who knows how many have really been killed? All we really have are numbers from the same government who lied us into the thing to start with. Why would I believe them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-06-07 12:44 AM
Response to Original message
4. All those billions they get...
And they still fuck up the mail. These guys would flunk lunch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-06-07 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. Isn't privatization grand?
Edited on Sat Jan-06-07 10:42 AM by DoYouEverWonder
it costs at 3x's as much to pay a private contracter for the same job the military use to do for themselves.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barrett808 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-06-07 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
12. U.S. army says it mistakenly urged dead officers to return to active service
WASHINGTON (AP) - The U.S. army said Friday it would apologize to the families of about 275 officers killed or wounded in action who were mistakenly sent letters urging them to return to active duty.

The letters were sent a few days after Christmas to more than 5,100 army officers who had recently left the service. Included were letters to about 75 officers killed in action and about 200 wounded in action.

"Army personnel officials are contacting those officers' families now to personally apologize for erroneously sending the letters," the army said in a brief news release issued Friday night.

The army did not say how or when the mistake was discovered. It said the database normally used for such correspondence with former officers had been "thoroughly reviewed" to remove the names of wounded or dead soldiers.

"But an earlier list was used inadvertently for the December mailings," the army statement said, adding that the army is apologizing to those officers and families affected and "regrets any confusion."

http://www.cbc.ca/cp/Oddities/070105/K010511AU.html



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-06-07 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. It's just wonderful how they care for those who have departed, isn't it?
Sickening, just sickening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-06-07 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. This is really, really bad
What an embarrassment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
partylessinOhio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-06-07 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. How dare they die and not continue to serve endless tours in Iraq for
their wonderful leader impostor. :sarcasm:


This is such an unkind and unnecessarily crass insult to grieving families. This would never have been tolerated in the America I grew up in. What has happened to that America?





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MeasureTwice Donating Member (26 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-06-07 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. Uh.. That does not compute.
People killed in action (or wounded and sent home) on an 'Earlier list' would either be inactive (if they were wounded or killed before the list was made) or 'Active Duty' if the list was made later.

Someone was careless making the list, you cannot make that mistake with an old list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-06-07 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. Fifty one hundred officers recently left the service?
Sure 275 officers had to leave due to death or health reasons, but that leaves about forty eight hundred officers who volunteered recently to leave the service.

Officers are usually career men. Forty eight hundred recently leaving the service jumps out to me as being very very odd.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lebkuchen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-06-07 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. Will the US Army apologize for redeploying soldiers with PTSD?
An excerpted letter to Stripes -- "Disgusted with some articles"

Also there was “New guidelines let troops with PTSD re-deploy” (article, Dec. 22). I understand that the armed forces are hurting for personnel, but to redeploy a servicemember who is already broken back to war and then try to reintroduce them into society is madness. To redeploy these servicemembers is just flat-out wrong, whether they are in remission or not.

It’s like being in remission from lung cancer and smoking a pack of cigarettes; the flare-up of PTSD is inevitable.

http://www.estripes.com/article.asp?section=125&article=42574

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-06-07 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
19. US Army urges dead to re-enlist
The US Army is to apologise to the families of officers killed or wounded in action who were sent letters urging them to return to active duty.
>
>
It said the database normally used for such correspondence with former officers had been "thoroughly reviewed" to remove the names of dead and wounded soldiers.

"But an earlier list was used inadvertently for the December mailings," it added

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/6237607.stm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-06-07 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. They are not dead. They are undead. An army of the undead lead by a chimpanzee. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaurenG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-06-07 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. ROFL
:spank:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proust78 Donating Member (54 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-06-07 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. "I talk to families who die" --Bush 12/7/06


It's okay, he asked for permission from the dead families first. All of you obviously don't understand the sacrifices needed from dead people to win the War on Terra.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-06-07 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
22. Whoops !
Didn't realise you'd posted it earlier - sorry. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-06-07 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
24. It's clear to me, the dead need to step up and sacrifice a little more for their country. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MGD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-06-07 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
25. My whole NG unit got orders for Iraq one day. It was later determined to be a clerical error too.
The Army is real good at fucking up paperwork.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wellst0nev0ter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-06-07 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
26. These Shitsleeve Fuckups Can't Run A Lemonade Stand (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-06-07 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
27. No doubt these dead soldiers also vote Republican. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NobleCynic Donating Member (991 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-07-07 02:01 AM
Response to Original message
28. ...sigh
It's honest mistake people. If there is to be criticism about the military let it be about something more substantive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 12:36 AM
Response to Reply #28
32. No, it is NOT an honest mistake. It is the worst possible mistake.
Did you know that LBJ personally signed every condolence letter? Hundreds a day. He didn't give it to the autopen, he didn't delegate it to the SECDEF. I am familiar with how they run decedent affairs, the checklists that are used when a servicemember dies, and the purging of the databases that accompanies said deaths. This was just a fuckup, plain and simple. A serious fuckup, that caused additional pain to grieving families, where someone responsible for doing basic data entry either was on vacation, sick leave or unsupervised, and either didn't have someone else to pick up the slack or just didn't do the job. What stuns me, too, is that the people preparing and sending out the "Come Back, Little Sheba" letters didn't do an additional double-check to ensure that there weren't any names that didn't belong on the distribution list after they sent the letter through the long and sluggish chop chain--they could have checked this against half a dozen separate databases, not just a single one. They also could have checked the list against the casualty lists, to ensure that they weren't encouraging some legless kid to come back as well.

If you were a parent getting a letter like that from the gubmint addressed to your dead child, I wager you'd think it was a substantive error...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paulie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #32
37. Plus the service number is a unique identifier
So you're not comparing two "John Smiths" on a list, but two uniquely identified people. So there is even LESS of an excuse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #37
41. Precisely. The Service Number is the SSAN. You can weed out the dead and wounded using that
datapoint alone. You can take the list of people who have been killed or wounded, and match those datapoints against your list of people who have been mustered out to whom you are sending your letters. Any convergence on those lists will be kicked out in a separate listing. Then, some clerk sits their ass down and pulls those letters out. Then, the clerk sends the list over to the clown managing the list of discharged personnel and tells them to get their shit together and delete the names of the dead from the database.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #32
43. DING DING DING! MADem, you're our grand prize winner!
This was...(a) serious fuckup that caused additional pain to grieving families, where someone...was on vacation, sick leave or unsupervised, and either didn't have someone else to pick up the slack or just didn't do the job.

If the Pentagon can no longer keep track of dead soliders correctly, what hope do the live ones have? And with all the money Bush has been sending them, why don't they have the manpower they need to keep everything on track?

:mad:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #28
36. For want of a nail, the shoe was lost
For want of a shoe, the horse was lost

etc etc etc
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire Walk With Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-07-07 04:18 AM
Response to Original message
29. If they can vote Republican while dead, they can serve their country as well.
Looks like someone tapped into the voter lists...always check the tombstones...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superconnected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-07-07 04:55 AM
Response to Original message
30. they just want to kill em again
okay, seriously, this sounds like a sad computer error, where they simply didn't update the computer but mailed out to the list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #30
34. It's UNSAT ... shame on the Admin who permitted this error. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SayWhatYo Donating Member (991 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
38. oh man, poor families...
I think they forgot...

SELECT FROM...AND not_dead = '1'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
40. Hell, Parents should send their coffins to report to duty.
Our military is a joke!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
42. ..
:banghead:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zuiderelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
44. My heart goes out to those families.
It would be heartbreaking to receive a letter like that. Idiots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
46. How upsetting for the families.
Good thing they sent an apology, at least. Yikes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC