Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Under fire, US marines hand off battered Fallujah (only 300 Marines left)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Barrett808 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-22-06 07:06 PM
Original message
Under fire, US marines hand off battered Fallujah (only 300 Marines left)
Edited on Wed Nov-22-06 07:17 PM by Barrett808
Under fire, US marines hand off battered Fallujah
Just 300 marines now patrol key Sunni city as Iraqi military takes over.
By Scott Peterson | Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor

FALLUJAH, IRAQ – From Observation Post Blazer, marines view Fallujah through a thick sheet of bullet-proof glass - already tested with numerous impacts. Or they stare through night-vision goggles or a thermal imaging scope that can pick up the heat of a dog hundreds of yards away.

The marines still patrol key roads. The US military, which still travels boldly through town despite a surge in deadly sniper attacks and roadside bombs, is spending $200 million on 60-plus projects to rebuild the city, heavily damaged in fighting two years ago.

But with just 300 marines, the US military footprint is smaller in this Sunni stronghold of more than 300,000 than it has been in two years. As the marine presence shrinks and Iraqis take more control, Fallujah - once a template for counterinsurgency efforts in Iraq, where US forces have controlled all the variables - is likely again to set a standard for the rest of the country.

"A lot of us feel like we have our hands tied behind our back," says Cpl. Peter Mattice, of Bravo Company, 1st Battalion, 24th Marine Regiment. "In Fallujah, insurgents know our rules of engagement - they know when to stop, just before we engage."

(more)

http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/1124/p01s04-woiq.html



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-22-06 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. This is what Fallajah looked like a couple of years ago
after the first major offensive.



It must be really bad at this point.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barrett808 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-23-06 02:02 AM
Response to Reply #1
11. C'mon, there's $200 million of reconstruction money thrown at that problem
I'm sure we taxpayers got our money's worth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-23-06 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #1
16. aerial view of Fallujah showing an area leveled


http://nhindymedia.org/mod/columns/display/24/index.php

Falluja is at 33.20N, 43.55E, I don't know what part of Fallujah
this is, Falluja can bee seen via Google Earth, don't know how
old the photos are.

A charity helping to reconstruct:

http://www.jsintl.org/gallery/view/11



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grytpype Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-22-06 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. A chilling moment in this article...
"Fallujah has an iconic value to the Marine Corps," says Colonel Nicholson, commander of the Regimental Combat Team 5, which covers Fallujah and a populated swath of Anbar Province, in an interview. "Fallujah falling would be like Iwo Jima falling to the Japanese again after World War II - it would be intolerable."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-22-06 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Or like Hue City falling to the DRV
Oh, wait a second...

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grytpype Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-22-06 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. "This is my weapon, this is my gun!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-22-06 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Doesn't Iwo Jima belong to Japan? It is their property, isn't it?
With every city taken in combat, it has to be understood upfront that the city will go back to the rightful inhabitants at some point - unless the conquest is for permanent settlement. Right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-22-06 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Unless you KILL all the INHABITANTS
Edited on Wed Nov-22-06 08:27 PM by saigon68
and bury their SKULLS

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-22-06 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. yes, but the theory is that the "bad guys" lost. Oh, wait a minute, perhaps...
they did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-23-06 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #7
21. What's that supposed to mean?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Red1 Donating Member (247 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-22-06 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
8. Our Best, Our Proudest, Bush Doesn't Care
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
okoboji Donating Member (510 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-23-06 08:09 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. this has got to stop
remember during the last 4 years during the Clinton Administration, the Repugs, did nothing but bitch and moan, how Clinton, was destroying our military?

bastards .... who is doing it now? Walt Disney?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-22-06 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
9. "A lot of us feel like we have our hands tied behind our back"
as in 'can't we just massacre them again like we did two years ago?'. Get our troops out of there. Now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-23-06 12:55 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. As if napalm and white phosphorous would break the Iraqis' will to survive.
We saw what it did - it just enraged them even more, made the resistance against the illegal occupation even fiercer.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solo_in_MD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-23-06 07:42 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Actually it slowed the resistance significantly, as did the scout.sniper teams
The reality is that one the enemy knows your ROE, they will push to just that point. Reintroducing snipers into the mix would cause considerable pause. Its one of the tactics the insurgents really fear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SlavesandBulldozers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-23-06 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. i like the idea of getting the fuck out of Iraq better.
then again I have those pre-9/11 values of not being an empire, so what the hell do i know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-23-06 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. Why not just take a page from Joe Stalin's playbook?
Just haul out 1/100 of the locals and execute them on the spot. Let it be known that any more incidents and another round of decimation will follow. Or better yet how about we get the heck out of their towns and cities and country and stop messing with their lives and killing them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
file83 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-23-06 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. Actually, our snipers have become less of a factor the last year or so...
Edited on Thu Nov-23-06 12:12 PM by file83
...the insurgents have figured out all the best sniper positions, and they know how to evade our scout snipers. http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/22/world/middleeast/22sniper.html "> Read about it here - New York Times November 22, 2006
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-23-06 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #12
20. the insurgents don't ''fear'' us at all.
they simply change tactics, regions, whatever it takes -- they change, morph, whatever -- and we can never, ever do that.

we are ''stuck'' as it were -- and we know we are in possesion of less than creative, mobile minds leading our troops -- is it a signal for the future and future combat situations -- who knows?

but THIS empire has been beaten twice now by ''insurgents''.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4bucksagallon Donating Member (324 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-23-06 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
18. Much Progress Made in Fallujah, Marine Commander Says
This is the crap the military is spouting. I remember all to well receiving letters from home when I was in Nam, asking me how come we were still there with all the success we were having. Then the stories in the Stars and Stripes about how much progress we were making in winning the "hearts and minds" of the insurgents. LOADS OF BS.
http://www.military.com/features/0,15240,119124,00.html?ESRC=marine.nl


WASHINGTON, Nov. 17, 2006 – Two years ago, much of the Iraqi city of Fallujah had suffered severe damage after some of the hardest fighting seen since the country was liberated by U.S. and coalition forces in the spring of 2003.
Today, construction across Fallujah is booming, and the city's 400,000-resident population is growing, Marine Col. Larry D. Nicholson, commander of Regimental Combat Team 5, told Pentagon reporters today from Fallujah during a satellite-televised news conference.


To illustrate Fallujah's progress, Nicholson pointed to the reduced number of U.S. troops stationed in the city. In March 2005 at the end of his previous duty tour in Iraq, the colonel recalled, about 3,000 U.S. Marines and soldiers were operating in Fallajah. Upon his return to Iraq this February, Nicholson observed, about 300 U.S. troops were operating in Fallujah.

"That is a significant measure of progress under any scale," he pointed out.

Also, Fallujah had no police force in March 2005, Nicholson recalled. Today, he noted, the city boasts more than 700 Iraqi police officers.

Routine teamwork and pragmatism employed by U.S., coalition and Iraqi officials has greatly contributed to the city's success, Nicholson said.

Fallujah's progress has made it a beacon of hope for many beleaguered Sunnis fleeing the violence in Baghdad, Nicholson pointed out.

"While the fleeing of Sunni citizens from Baghdad is in itself a tragedy, the fact that Fallujah has become the overwhelming destination of choice for those seeking refuge and peace is a great testament to the work done here in Fallujah by the coalition forces, the Iraqi forces, and the local government," Nicholson said.




What a load of crap................................ this is why reporters need to be in the military units.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barrett808 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-23-06 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Wow. Propaganda of the purest ray serene.
I don't think Fallujah is "boasting" about anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RagingInMiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-23-06 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
22. So much for the roses they were supposed to toss at us
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 07:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC