Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A Secret in the Line of Succession --WaPo

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-16-06 08:21 PM
Original message
A Secret in the Line of Succession --WaPo
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/10/15/AR2006101500691.html?referrer=email&referrer=email&referrer=email

A Secret in the Line of Succession

By Charles Babington
Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, October 16, 2006; A19



House Speaker J. Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.) shows no sign of resigning over the Mark Foley-House page scandal. But the mere suggestion that he might do so raises an intriguing political and constitutional question: Who would replace him while Congress is in recess?

The answer, it appears, is on a piece of paper locked away in the House clerk's office.

In a little-noticed action taken nearly four years ago, the House amended its rules dealing with the "continuity of Congress" in emergencies and the succession of speakers. The rule, cited recently in Roll Call, directs the speaker to "deliver to the Clerk a list of Members in the order in which each shall act as Speaker pro tempore . . . in the case of a vacancy in the office of Speaker."

Normally, "speaker pro tempore" is the title given for a few hours at a time to various members of the majority who preside over House sessions. But the rules revision made in January 2003, in response to worries about terrorist strikes that could wipe out large numbers of elected officials, appears to bestow upon a newly named replacement all the powers enjoyed by a full-time speaker elected by his peers.

One thing is certain: The identity of the speaker-in-waiting is a closely held secret. Hastert's office declined to discuss the matter, citing security concerns, and the clerk's office confirmed only that Hastert's list is not made public...As for nightmarish constitutional what-ifs, Kinkopf said, "Imagine where the presidency falls not to the speaker, but to somebody on the speaker's secret list."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-16-06 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. Anyone want to make any guesses?
Who is one that secret list?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zeemike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-16-06 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Tom Delay is probably on it ...but he is out n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-17-06 07:36 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. Actually, he could serve as speaker.
Much to my surprise, I recently learned that the speaker of the house does not have to be a member of congress. Found it at wikipedia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-17-06 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #10
19. You mean Reverend Moon could become Speaker?
Do you have to be a citizen?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tigress DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-17-06 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #7
18. Or Foley.
bad tigress!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-16-06 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. We should all just trust them, and go about our business
they are keeping us SAFE!

just imagine the most terrifying thing you can, and then imagine these great patriots protecting us from it...

be vigilant, fellow Americans, all is well...God is on our side!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sofa king Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-16-06 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. What the f---?
Edited on Mon Oct-16-06 08:28 PM by sofa king
I thought the line of succession was pretty clearly enumerated. If there's no Speaker to take the job or he doesn't want it, it goes to the President pro Tempore in the Senate. If he can't take it or won't, then it returns to the former President's cabinet.

As I understand this article, 434 people just cut into the line of succession for the Presidency. Can that possibly be?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EST Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-16-06 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. 230...
I seriously doubt there are any dems on the list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-16-06 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. If Any of Them Are Left By Then
at this rate, the bench will be empty before Hastert is defeated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Massacure Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-16-06 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Yes, I'm confused by this too.
If the for some reason the President dies, and the Vice-President dies, and the Speaker of the House dies, and the Speaker of the House has a "secret" list of people to replace him as Speaker of the House, does that mean the new President is the second person on the "secret" line of secession to Speaker of the House provided he or she is still alive or does it go onto the President pro Tempore assuming he is still alive? The Speaker of the House cannot designate a new Speaker that is does not serve in the House, he cannot take a senator for example. So if the second Speaker becomes the president, that means a whole lot of people just budded in line...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-17-06 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. If that list is used it can though I believe illegally only be used
to fill the position if the Speaker accepts the spot as President.

The list cannot be used to have someone step in that was not elected during the regular start of the Congressional Session to become President. If the Speaker was not elected at the start of the Congressional Session and their is a vacancy in the office of President and the list reaches the Speaker then it should bypass and continue down the list. IMO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-17-06 08:27 AM
Response to Reply #3
12. But the House rules were amended to ensure that there always is a Speaker
Unless everyone on that list is dead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-17-06 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. When we get control back House Rules need to be amended to ensure
that no Republican is ever Speaker again ESPECIALLY no descendant of Prescott Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-17-06 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. How do you amend the rules to ensure that no Republican
is ever Speaker?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tigress DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-17-06 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #16
23. Polygraph, sodium penathol & 3 questions.

1
Do you secretly approve of the way the *ush regime manipulated themselves into power?

2
Have you ever engaged in illegal or immoral sex acts?

3
Have you ever taken money knowing that it required you to vote a certain way?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Andrea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-17-06 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
26. OP is talking about the line of succession to Speaker
of the House. You are talking about line of succession to President. If Hastert resigned, the new Speaker would come from his list. If that happened, and then Bush and Cheney were out, next in line would be the new speaker, the person from the list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YDogg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-16-06 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
4. Man on Dog.
I just like typing Man on Dog.

:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-16-06 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
9. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-17-06 07:52 AM
Response to Original message
11. I don't want no steenkin Secret Government. I am an American
We want open democracy.

Republicons and their secret shit can go to Russia -- where they belong...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-17-06 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
15. More
Perhaps the biggest question, some lawyers say, is whether a House speaker -- full time or pro tempore -- can assume and keep the presidency under any circumstance. A statute, not the Constitution, lists the speaker's place in the line succession.

A case can be made that no one in Congress qualifies as an "officer" eligible to assume the presidency under Article II of the Constitution, said Neil Kinkopf, a professor of law at Georgia State University. The question may never be settled, he said, because the Supreme Court would take it up only if a speaker became president and someone challenged the action in court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-17-06 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. Kinkopf's reading seems wrong. Do you have a link?
The Constitution states that "Congress may by law provide for the case of removal, death, resignation or inability, both of the president and vice-president, delcaring what officer shall then act as president." The Constitution also specifies that the HOuse of Representatives "shall chuse their Speaker and other officers." That certainly suggests that the Speaker is an "officer" and thus can be designated,by law, to succeed to the presidency in the event of a vacancy in both the office of the president and vice president.


The flaw that I see in the so-called "secret list" approach is that the Constitution specifies that presidential succession may be provided for "by law". The Presidential Succession Act says that tin the event of a vacancy in the presidency and vice presidency, the Speaker becomes president. THe issue is whether the House, by changing its rules (not a change "by law") can create a position of Speaker pro tempore that has the same standing under the Succession Act as the Speaker. It would seem to upset the balance between the two Houses of COngress if the House of Reps could, without the assent of the Senate, effectively alter the line of succession.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tigress DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-17-06 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #17
20. Looks wrong to me too. But then... so is legalizing torture.
It does give us a way to fight it though. Good catch.

Just because it is as wrong as wrong can be doesn't mean they won't push it through if they can.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tigress DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-17-06 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #17
21. But if it's only UNTIL the Congress can come together and vote...
Edited on Tue Oct-17-06 11:56 AM by Tigress DEM

It might be more like pushing John Bolton through as a recess appointment and then as long as we get a majority we can fight back. If no majority then we get stuck with whoever is on the list and whoever they bodyslam into the seat with their lock step vote.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-17-06 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #17
27. Same link as original posting... bottom of article
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-17-06 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
22. I see a Supreme Court case is in the future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
savemefromdumbya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-17-06 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
24. Hard luck babes, the speaker will be Nancy Pelosi after Nov 06
They will have to unlock the name and throw it out the piece of paper!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-17-06 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. They should make sure the public knows who was on the list
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-17-06 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
25. i remember when this happened and Tom Delay was Hasterts replacement
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 03:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC