Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

LAT: 'Stay the Course' in Iraq? No Way, U.S. Panel Says

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-16-06 12:00 AM
Original message
LAT: 'Stay the Course' in Iraq? No Way, U.S. Panel Says
http://www.latimes.com:/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-planb16oct16,0,4775251.story?coll=la-home-headlines&vote25918918=1

A commission backed by President Bush that is exploring U.S. options in Iraq intends to propose significant changes in the administration's strategy by early next year, members say.

Two options under consideration would represent reversals of U.S. policy: withdrawing American troops in phases, and bringing neighboring Iran and Syria into a joint effort to stop the fighting.

While it weighs alternatives, the 10-member commission headed by former Secretary of State James A. Baker III has agreed on one principle.

"It's not going to be 'stay the course,' " one participant said. "The bottom line is, isn't working.... There's got to be another way."

If the panel recommends overhauling Bush's approach to Iraq, it could give a boost not only to critics of current policy but also to officials in the administration who have argued for broad changes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-16-06 12:14 AM
Response to Original message
1. The Emperor may not be amused.
We'll see if Bush uses the Military Commissions Act to toss Baker and the other commissioners in the dungeon and throw away the key. I just hope Torquemada isn't down there with them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clarkie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-16-06 12:16 AM
Response to Original message
2. Still, one has to wonder if shrub will listen to the recommendations
of his own panel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Journeyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-16-06 12:48 AM
Response to Original message
3. WHAT officials in the administration have argued for broad changes?...
Who among the Bushistas has been so bold as to even question the policy, let alone argue for something else?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-16-06 01:11 AM
Response to Original message
4. SO great to see this story getting more attention. They were going
to try to keep a lid on this report until after the election.

It would be even more hilarious to see the bushies turn on Baker - the very guy who "fixed" the 2000 election so they could get in and start wrecking everything in sight, in the first place. They owe him EVERYTHING. And they're gonna trash him, too. Let's hear some of them call Baker a traitor or appeaser or a cut-n-run weenie. They wouldn't even be where they are now, without him. No honor among thieves, that's for sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-16-06 03:43 AM
Response to Original message
5. "Stability First", "Redeploy and Contain" or GW's fav: "Stay the Course...
In its most recent closed-door meetings, the commission focused on two options drafted by experts outside the government.

One, titled "Stability First," calls for continuing to try to stabilize Baghdad, boosting efforts to entice insurgents into politics, and bringing Iran and Syria into plans to end the fighting.

The other, called "Redeploy and Contain," goes further. It calls for a gradual, phased withdrawal of American troops to bases outside Iraq where they would be available for strikes against terrorist organizations anywhere in the region.

The experts also prepared an option called "Stay the Course, Redefine the Mission," and an alternative urging a quick U.S. withdrawal, but the panel appeared less interested in those plans, participants said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
creeksneakers2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-16-06 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
6. Iran to stop the fighting how?
That sounds crazy to me. Iran already has far more influence than it should.

If Iran wants to cooperate by using its influence to get factions to come to the peace table that would be great. If the new plan is to bring Iranian troops into Iraq, that's nuts!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 03:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC