I believe Republican operatives may have deliberately given strong monetary incentives to low-wage contract workers to falsify a few dozen registrations, just so the forgeries would be discovered and just so media stories like this one would be published.
Why would Republicans do that?
Do you remember a NY Times editorial about "vote suppression" though the deceptive "Voter ID" bill (HR4844) that passed the House a few weeks ago? There's a great DU thread on this with lots of good links, archived at
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=364x2184544 .
The same people who got Dubya installed in the White House in 2001 through not counting votes in Florida have dreamed up a truly impressive scheme to replicate the 2000 election theft in every state, and in every election from 2008 onward. Jim Baker, the leader of the post-election Bush team in Florida in 2000, dreamed up "Voter ID" and pushed it into the 2005 "Carter-Baker Commission" report, with recommendations for legislation to prevent future election fiascos. But "Voter ID" would not prevent future Floridas; instead, it would ENSURE them.
The 2006 election provides the RNC its the last big oppportunity to gather examples of "voter fraud", so that at least ELEVEN MILLION voters (mainly Democrats) can be disfranchised in 2008 by a bill that will be re-introduced next year. We may be only one Senate vote and one House re-vote away from permanent minority status for the Democratic Party, starting two years from now.
Right now, "Voter ID" is a solution in search of a problem. Seeding the media with stories like this one tend to create the perception of a problem Republicans need to sell their ingenious plan.
IMO, Republican operatives in Tennessee and elsewhere may deliberately be providing low-wage contract campaign workers with incentives to falsify registrations, just so these kinds of news stories will be published, and they can use such reports as pretexts for stealing MILLIONS of votes, not just a few dozen, with "Voter ID" legislation.
If you were practically destitute and could get, say, $30 per card for falsifying as many voter registration cards as you wanted, what would you do?
No one has provided in court any evidence whatsoever that any person ever has been impersonated at the polls. But nonetheless, without any weighing of alleged benefits of "Voter ID" to its costs in disfranchisement, this ingenious scheme needs only a few dozen incidents like these to fool even experienced Democratic campaign workers into suppporting "Voter ID".
If "Voter ID" gets through the Senate (it has already passed the House as HR 4844), MILLIONS of voters WILL be disfranchised. (See
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=2841188&mesg_id=2841188 for the best available conservative estimate, ELEVEN MILLION). Who is not likely to carry picture ID at all times? Why, people without cars or jobs to drive to every day. And who are those people, and how do they tend to vote? In throwing out ste-level voter ID laws in Missouri and Georgia, courts found that hundreds of thousands of people without drivers' licenses would have been disfranchised in each of those states. So the RNC has decided to make "Voter ID" national election law.
IMO, it is highly unlikely anyone would try to swing an election with a few dozen impersonations of supposedly registered voters. As several other posters in this thread have noticed, this particular Tennessee scheme doesn't even make sense. The forgeries were BOUND to be caught. IMO, that must have been the motive for paying for them. If the objective were to influence elections, a much better plan would simply have been to set up voter registration tables in minority areas, have hundreds or thousands of previously registered people fill them out, and then simply throw them away after they'd all been collected and the campaign workers paid off. On election day, hundreds who wanted to vote Democratic would show up at the polls thinking they were registered. But in fact they would not be.
IMO, deliberately giving contract workers incentives to falsify registrations, to help make the case for "Voter ID", is the only explanation that makes sense here.