Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

GOP's new `values agenda' item fails

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
deadparrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 04:32 PM
Original message
GOP's new `values agenda' item fails
WASHINGTON - House Republicans failed Wednesday to advance a bill protecting the words "under God" in the Pledge of Allegiance. Only a day earlier, the GOP had placed the measure on its "American Values Agenda" in hopes of bolstering the party's prospects in the fall election.

But Republicans could not muster a simple majority on the issue in a committee where they outnumber Democrats by six.

The legislation tries to strip federal courts of jurisdiction over cases challenging the pledge. It responds to a federal appeals court ruling in 2002 that the pledge is unconstitutional because it contains the words "under God." A district court judge made a similar ruling last fall, citing the appeals court precedent.

A simple majority is required to report a bill to the House floor with a favorable committee recommendation. The House Judiciary Committee split 15-15 on the pledge bill Wednesday; Rep. Bob Inglis, R-S.C., joined 14 Democrats to oppose it.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060628/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/pledge
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. What war? What economy? What national debt? What healthcare?
Redstome
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Agenda's designed to train the eye to the superficial--the Media loves it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
22. The media salivates over this shit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Please add GITMO detainees tortured to your list
with only 10 actually "tried" in Military Tribunals since they were detained.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Debi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Redstome? A distant cousin? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChoralScholar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. Reminds me of the Lewis Black special:
"We've got an educational system that's in the shitter. We've got a war going on. There is one thing after another. And what did our President think was important? Queers! That's what's important. Somehow, if we could stop the gays from getting married, everything else would turn out just fine. Everything would change. There would be solar energy!"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eugene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. This is beautiful. Bob Inglis sees the writing on the wall.
From the article:
Inglis said he is concerned that if the Republican-dominated Congress passes
"court-stripping" legislation, a future Democrat-dominated Congress might pass
its own bill denying courts jurisdiction of more issues.

:kick: and recommend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
4. How/why can Sensenbrenner 'try again'? That's ridiculous.
Does he get to do it over and over until he gets the right amount of votes?:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divine Discontent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #4
17. the wonderful world of
democracy and getting to do things over & over as long as you can get away with it... I never liked sensenbrenner like I do a small minority of moderate repubs (arlen).



www.cafepress.com/warisprofitable <<<--- check it out!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
6. Their "values" are not my values.
Never have been. Never will be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moobu2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
7. These bills actually passing isn’t the GOPukes point
In fact they would rather they didn’t pass so they could continue using the issues. The intention is to inflame the GOP base crazies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluzmann57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
9. Ok fundies, once and for all times, here are values
Respecting your fellow human, regardless of race, religion, sexual orientation, or any other percieved flaws, helping those who are down on their luck, respecting human life as sacred, respecting freedom of choice, for women as well as men, no war except when absolutely unavavoidable, REALLY and truly accepting the ten commandents as a guidepost to a better life. Now if any fundy can truly live up to these standards, then come and talk to me. Otherwise, leave me alone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divine Discontent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. we humans have trouble when we speak for God
and for them to use God as a way to secure votes seems slightly tacky & may be sacrilegious. I'd think He'd be unamused. Even when I in my life have spoken in smaller scopes of what I think God implies, I pray He forgives me if I'm wrong, these people are doing it for a bill to RALLY their party???? ICK!




www.cafepress.com/warisprofitable <<<--- check it out!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DUBYASCREWEDUS Donating Member (195 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:40 AM
Response to Reply #14
20. Love them!
Edited on Thu Jun-29-06 07:40 AM by DUBYASCREWEDUS
Can we add:

"I think, therefore I'm a Democrat"

"You voted for Bush? How embarrassing!"

"Bush-Cheney: Spending money we don't have, to protect
freedoms we've destroyed, from weapons
that don't exist"

"Annoy a Conservative; Think for yourself!"


We could do this all day!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divine Discontent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 03:46 AM
Response to Reply #20
28. YOU ARE SO SWEET!
that is very kind of you to say! I absolutely cracked up at "You voted for Bush? How embarrassing!" I will make new designs for ALL those tomorrow for my shop if you don't mind. thank you!

The Bush-Cheney I heard something like that before, and forgot it, it's sooooo true! ty!



www.cafepress.com/warisprofitable <<<--- check it out!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
10. Wouldn't that violate the separation of powers between the
branches of government?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divine Discontent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. sarcasm noted! :) (eom)


www.cafepress.com/warisprofitable <<<--- check it out!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SallyMander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
11. speaking of values...
This just in on cnn.com: "A political consultant whose company was behind a television ad accusing the Clinton-Gore administration of giving away nuclear technology was convicted of child molestation charges."

Maybe on next weeks Top 10??? :P These f-ers are ridiculous...


<http://www.cnn.com/2006/LAW/06/28/consultant.conviction.ap/index.html>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
13. apparently "american values" is starting to mean something
a little different than what those freaks have in mind.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Harry Monroe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
15. The original Pledge of Allegience...
...did not even have the words "under God" in it" Those 2 words were added in 1954 by an act of Congress.

A little History on the Pledge..

History of the Pledge of Allegiance:

The Pledge was originally written in 1892-AUG by Francis Bellamy (1855 - 1931). He was an American, a Baptist minister, and an active Socialist. He included some of the concepts of his first cousin, Edward Bellamy, who wrote a number of socialist utopian novels, such as Looking Backward (1888) and Equality (1897). In its original form, it read:

"I pledge allegiance to my Flag and the Republic for which it stands, one nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all."

It was first published in a children's magazine Youth's Companion, in 1892 to celebrate the 400th anniversary of Columbus' arrival in the Americas. 4 The word "to" was added before "the Republic" in 1892-OCT. He considered including the word "equality" in the pledge, but decided against it because he knew that many Americans at the time were opposed to equality for women and African-Americans. Opposition to equality continues today; a sizeable minority of American adults remain opposed to equal rights for women, gays and lesbians.

By 1924, the "National Flag Conference, under the leadership of the American Legion and the Daughters of the American Revolution, changed the Pledge's words, 'my Flag,' to 'the Flag of the United States of America.' Francis Bellamy disliked this change, but his protest was ignored." 3

Most Jehovah's Witness children refuse to acknowledge the flag. In 1940, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that school boards could compel them to recite the Pledge. The court reversed itself three years later. 4

In 1953, the Roman Catholic men's group, the Knights of Columbus mounted a campaign to add the words "under God" to the Pledge. The nation was suffering through the height of the cold war, and the McCarthy communist witch hunt. Partly in reaction to these factors, a reported 15 resolutions were initiated in Congress to change the pledge. They got nowhere until Rev. George Docherty (1911 - ) preached a sermon that was attended by President Eisenhower and the national press corps on 1954-FEB-7. His sermon said in part: "Apart from the mention of the phrase 'the United States of America,' it could be the pledge of any republic. In fact, I could hear little Muscovites repeat a similar pledge to their hammer-and-sickle flag in Moscow." After the service, President Eisenhower said that he agreed with the sermon. In the following weeks, the news spread, and public opinion grew. Three days later, Senator Homer Ferguson, (R-MI), sponsored a bill to add God to the Pledge. It was approved as a joint resolution 1954-JUN-8. It was signed into law on Flag Day, JUN-14. President Eisenhower said at the time: "From this day forward, the millions of our schoolchildren will daily proclaim in every city and town, every village and rural schoolhouse, the dedication of our nation and our people to the Almighty." 4 With the addition of "under God" to the Pledge, it became both "a patriotic oath and a public prayer...Bellamy's granddaughter said he also would have resented this second change." 3

The change was partly motivated by a desire to differentiate between communism, which promotes Atheism, and Western capitalistic democracies, which were at least nominally Christian. The phrase "Atheistic Communists" has been repeated so many times that the public has linked Atheism with communism; the two are often considered synonymous. Many consider Atheism as unpatriotic and "un-American" as is communism.

Most communists, worldwide, are Atheists. But, in North America, the reverse is not true; most Atheists are non-communists. Although there are many Atheistic and Humanistic legislators at the federal and state levels, few if any are willing to reveal their beliefs, because of the intense prejudice against these belief systems.

The U.S. Supreme Court declined to review this change to the Pledge. The Court has commented in passing on the motto saying that: "ur previous opinions have considered in dicta the motto and the pledge , characterizing them as consistent with the proposition that government may not communicate an endorsement of religious belief."


http://www.religioustolerance.org/nat_pled1.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
corporatemedia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Porky Pig knew how to recite it in the Warner Bros. cartoon....
Edited on Wed Jun-28-06 11:52 PM by corporatemedia
"Old Glory"

“I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the republic for which it stands, one nation indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.”



From Wikpedia:

Old Glory is a Merrie Melodies animated cartoon directed by Chuck Jones, produced by Leon Schlesinger Productions, and released to theatres by Warner Bros. Pictures and The Vitaphone Corporation. It premiered at the famed Carthay Circle Theater at Los Angeles on July 1, 1939.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PegDAC Donating Member (906 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #18
27. I think it's high time
we stopped pledging allegiance to the symbol and started pledging our allegiance to the nation and the principles upon which it was founded.

Here's one I found on the Progressive Daily Beacon:

"I pledge allegiance to the Constitution of the United States of America, and to the Republic on which it stands, one Nation under the guiding principles of the Founding Fathers, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 03:16 AM
Response to Original message
19. American Values Agenda
sounds more like a menu category at a McGOPer's...

"I'll have the number 4. Does that come with a super-sized side of flag burning? and extra commandments please...."

there's a toon in this... :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColonelTom Donating Member (415 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 07:50 AM
Response to Original message
21. Let's start calling it the "Values Menu"
It's the same fast-food crap the Republican voters have been lapping up for years. Perhaps they can "Biggie-size" it and take away the entire Bill of Rights at once. :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissMillie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
23. The pledge itself is not unconstitutional
It's when people are forced to say the pledge that issues of constitutionality come into play.

Frankly, even if it didn't say "under God" I don't think anyone should be forced to say or even be in the presence of the pledge. "Liberty.... for all" means they shouldn't have to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinfoil tiaras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
24. ...Cause we all know it's more dangerous to see two guys get married
...than it is to go to war...

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigDDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
25. How dare they waste their time on this
when they could be fighting gay marriage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
26. the politics of personal identity is NOT enough, TRY AGAIN ROVE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 05:30 AM
Response to Original message
29. and they fail because if they don't, they can't revisit this wedge issue
next time around. but i get the feeling that kkkarl is running out of ideas that actually distract people. i personally think that people are quietly rising above his sophmore college tricks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC