Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Blanco signs law that would ban abortions

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-17-06 08:35 PM
Original message
Blanco signs law that would ban abortions
NEW ORLEANS (Reuters) - Louisiana Democratic Gov. Kathleen Blanco signed into law a ban on most abortions that would be triggered if the U.S. Supreme Court overturns its 1973 ruling legalizing the procedure, a spokesman said on Saturday.
The ban would apply to all abortions, even in cases of rape or incest, except when the mother's life is threatened........

http://go.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=politicsNews&storyID=12561199&src=rss/ElectionCoverage

What, no photos? No pens to hand out to admirers? No back-slapping and quotes for reporters and supporters?

http://www.commondreams.org.nyud.net:8090/headlines04/images/0426-10.jpg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Thickasabrick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-17-06 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. I don't get this. I thought she was a democrat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GrumpyGreg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-17-06 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. She's obviously a DINO !
Edited on Sat Jun-17-06 08:43 PM by GrumpyGreg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-18-06 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
74. Is there really a two party system anymore?
We have about forty to fifty fence sitters that vote with the Republicans. The two party system is close to being eliminated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GrumpyGreg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-18-06 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #74
92. Frankly I think it's time for a strong third party.
The other two parties seem to have lost their foci---with the exception of anything that will get a vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Megahurtz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #74
155. Honestly I believe that there is no Democratic Party anymore.
It is just looking way too weird lately.
I think that the Dems are selling out behind closed doors or something.
Cutting deals of some kind in secret or something.

Sure looks suspicious to me.
One thing that's clear is they're sure covering their own asses somehow in spite of all of us!:hurts:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #74
156. We have a system run by lobbyists. There is no more 'thinking' in Congress
No more representing 'the people'. Money talks and all else walks...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lcruiz Donating Member (7 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #74
162. could this really happen?
Why is every one so stupid, how could you vote to eliminte abortions. We live in a secular society, all these republicans are letting their religous backgrounds get in the way. We should all be able to make our own opinion and decisions. So many women die in third world countries because abortion is ilegal, is that what they want for us? There is no way if they become illegal that they will stop people from getting them. It's just going to create a larger issue, and can we discuss, POPULATION EXPLOSION and POVERTY increase. A country like Colombia in south america has the second largest crime rate, people become violent and desprete because of poverty. And poverty comes from youth becoming pregnant and not being able to contuine their education thus always stuck in low level jobs that are already scarce in colombia's struggling economy. So many young teenagers die from illegal abortions, and the ones who don't have them it's because they can't afford them. These poor babies, what kind of future do they have to look foward to? My mother had me when she was 18 in colombia, and she has told me how hard life was for her, she had to cease furthering her education to raise me. My father left for the states to finish his education and start a home for us and we met him 3years later, mother was forced to leave eveyrhting behind to give me a better future, she wasn't' able to see her family for five years until her residency was granted. Rarely do teenagers in Colombia have this luck, if you can call it that. I thought she was a democrat, is she not aware of all the orphans already???? OY OY O it pisses me off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-20-06 07:49 AM
Response to Reply #2
174. No, just a Democrat who doesn't agree with you on abortion
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-17-06 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. As a Democratic governor she must represent the majority of her state. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
otohara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-17-06 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
14. Seriously???
Edited on Sat Jun-17-06 09:08 PM by otohara
I voted for a dem senator in my state because he was the only choice and it was imperative that we have a dem to counter the other senator, who is a Republican.

Turns out this guy is another Joe Lieberman, no, he's worse than Lieberman actually.
This is not what I voted for, it was a very close race in the primary, so while he won in the end, a good amount of voters must be as disappointed as I am.

and I can say for fact that during the run up to the Iraq war, those democrats who voted "yes" disregarded the overwhelming number of phone calls, e-mails, faxes, letters from democrats pleading them the vote no, and what did they do?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-17-06 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. LA Senate approved bill 27-0. Suggest you read the following.
Edited on Sat Jun-17-06 09:26 PM by jody
Democrats Appoint Catholic Outreach Coordinator After Abortion Failures
QUOTE
After losing the Catholic vote in 2004 because of their extreme position in favor of all abortions, the Democratic National Committee has appointed a "Catholic outreach coordinator" to help the party win back some of it support. Someone will be hired for the post as early as this month.

“The last cycle was a wake-up call,” said Leslie Brown, coordinator of the Democrats' religious-based outreach efforts.

“When you lose with a Catholic candidate then you've got to go back” and address the problem, she told the National Catholic Reporter.

Pro-abortion Massachusetts Sen. John Kerry, a Catholic, was the Democratic nominee, but he lost the presidential race in large part because of the 22 percent of voters who said moral issues such as abortion were most important.
UNQUOTE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Violet_Crumble Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-17-06 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Please don't bother suggesting we read anti-choice crap...
'Lifenews'?? Since when has that been considered a reliable source, except to anti-choice nutters??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-17-06 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. How do you know the article is useless unless you read it? Do you want
Democratic candidates to be elected?

If so you must find a position on divisive issues that attracts over 50% of the vote.

Blanco realized that if she vetoed the bill her veto would be overridden and her veto would be used against her in the future.

I believe most Democratic and Republican politicians in Louisiana oppose abortion in varying degrees, see Louisiana candidates re abortion
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adriennui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-17-06 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #22
29. let their wives, sisters and daughters be raped. and have the babies.
sorry for the anger and crude language but i am just sick and tired of these assholes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Violet_Crumble Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-17-06 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #29
33. No apology necessary...
They are incapable of feeling the slightest bit of empathy, and I totally understand you being sick and tired of them :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-17-06 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #29
35. I understand but if Blanco had vetoed the bill, her veto would have been
overridden.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-18-06 01:30 AM
Response to Reply #29
41. And then...
let the rapist fathers sue for custody of the children. Bills like this are called rapists' rights bills.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Violet_Crumble Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-17-06 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #22
31. Because it's from a nutty anti-choice site, that's why...
I've read enough of their crap in the past to know it's not worth bothering with. Just curious, but are you opposed to abortion?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-17-06 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #31
34. IMO the issue is Blanco's vote. LA senate voted 27/0 and House 85/17 for
the bill. IMO Blanco would have been a fool to veto the bill when her veto would have been overridden.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FredScuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-18-06 07:53 AM
Response to Reply #34
52. Yeah, why take a stand for reproductive rights?
Edited on Sun Jun-18-06 07:53 AM by FredScuttle
"It's inevitable, so just lay back and enjoy it" - Bobby Knight

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-18-06 08:04 AM
Response to Reply #52
53. If Blanco had vetoed the bill it would still be law and its conditional
upon SCOTUS declaring a woman does not have an inalienable right to her body.

SCOTUS is systematically ruling a person has few inalienable rights while giving corporations and their owners more rights.

Our government of the people, by the people, for the people is threatened because SCOTUS is a tool of the one percent who own about 50% of our financial wealth, control every major multinational corporation in the U.S., and finance/control congress and the executive branch.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FredScuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-18-06 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #53
66. Why grease the wheels?
Why in the hell would a Democrat, no matter where they are, fall in line with a GOP red-meat issue? And I could frankly care less that her veto would be overridden....she'd be on the record and on the right side of history.

SCOTUS has not reversed Roe v. Wade yet, and I wouldn't be too sure that's it's a fait accompli. Even a neanderthal like Scalia (well, maybe not Scalia, but one of the other, less insane fundies on the Court) knows reversing Roe v. Wade unleashes a social civil war. We don't have to let the events of our time wash over us like we were pebbles on a goddamn beach....we can take a morally right stand and stick with it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-18-06 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #66
68. Do you oppose all Democratic candidates who do not support 100% our Dem
Party Platform?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FredScuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-18-06 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #68
79. Do you support "Democratic" candidates who sell out our values?
Edited on Sun Jun-18-06 08:22 PM by FredScuttle
I understand that we practice what we preach about being an inclusive party while the GOP just pays lip service to the "big tent" concept, but, for me, a woman's right to consult with her physician concerning her pregnancy is sacrosanct.

So, to answer your question, if a candidate wants to pick and choose which planks of the platform he or she wants to support, it is less than likely I will support them.

It's in the platform for a reason.

Now, to preempt you bringing up Reid or Murtha...let me ask this - when was the last time you heard either gentleman pontificate on abortion?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-18-06 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #79
87. "Values" my ass! This is about RIGHTS!
Edited on Sun Jun-18-06 09:40 PM by Zhade
(I know you understand this, just making it clearer for the others.)

Blanco is signing away rights SHE HAS NO RIGHT TO SIGN AWAY.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FredScuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-18-06 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #87
91. Right!
Thanks for the correction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-18-06 11:18 PM
Response to Reply #91
93. Anytime! Keep fighting the good fight.
:pals:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 07:38 AM
Response to Reply #79
98. Many prominent Democrats oppose platform positions such as Ted Kennedy ,
Dianne Feinstein and Chuck Schumer.

I assume you support them so why do you pick and choose?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FredScuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #98
105. You care to provide any specifics?
Edited on Mon Jun-19-06 09:14 AM by FredScuttle
Or is a blanket attack against three prominent Democratic senators sufficient for you?

Like I said upthread...we're talking about abortion here. You've were asked first why you're so quick to defend Blanco's ash-canning a woman's right to choose. Why?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #105
109. See post #99. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FredScuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #109
121. I saw it and it still doesn't answer my question
you want to spell out exactly how the three Dems you mentioned are contradicting the party platform on guns?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-18-06 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #34
73. You didn't answer Violet's question. -nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 07:48 AM
Response to Reply #73
100. My position is irrelevant since the thread is about Blanco's action. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 08:37 AM
Response to Reply #100
103. So's the article in the RW site you cited, which is what prompted...
...the question. So, no, we will not stop talking about things because they're inconvenient for you.

I repeat what Violet asked: are you opposed to abortion?

You, of course, are perfectly free NOT to answer, whether by staying silent or by dodging. We, on the other hand, are free to arrive to the logical conclusions of what you say, and to call a spade a spade.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-20-06 01:50 AM
Response to Reply #34
165. Yeah, why should any politician show any courage
or principled stand?

:sarcasm:

WHEN IS THIS COWARDLY SHIT GOING TO STOP???

Or maybe she's really anti-choice and should be thrown out in the next election?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-18-06 12:41 AM
Response to Reply #22
40. What good is electing them if they are going to take your rights away?
Why would I want an anti choice Dem elected? Are you serious? As a woman this is the line in the sand for me. Anti-choice no vote. My human rights are not negotiable. Period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-18-06 07:42 AM
Response to Reply #40
48. Apparently Blanco did what those who voted for her wanted. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FredScuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-18-06 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #48
80. So did the Dixiecrats. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jus_the_facts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #48
113. Apparently she DID NOT do what I wanted her to do.....
....yet I voted for her...the weak lame assed excuses like..."at least she's not a republican...and she's gotta go along to get along down there with all those conservatives..." the La.state government is MAJORITY DEMOCRAT...SURE SEEMS LIKE THERE'S NO DAMN DIFFERENCE BETWEEN *PARTIES* and DINO's everywhere you look these days. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wellst0nev0ter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-18-06 02:35 AM
Response to Reply #22
44. The Raped And Sodomized Virgin Will Thank Her
If I recall correctly, that would be the only type of girls protected under these phillistine laws that are being passed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-18-06 07:48 AM
Response to Reply #44
50. SB 33 is even more stringent, its purpose is
"to prohibit abortion of a human being, except when necessary to save the life of the mother and when necessary to prevent substantial risk of death or permanent impairment under certain circumstances; to provide for criminal consequences for violations; to provide for the act to only become effective upon the occurrence of certain events; to provide for severability; and to provide for related matters."

See SB33 - 2006 Regular Session
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #44
158. What an insult to the Phillistines.
;)

I'm so angry I'm numb.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mountainman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-18-06 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #22
62. So you are one of those who believe in abandoning principal to win
elections. Through away a woman's right to chose to win elections. Not my kind of Dem. Be like a reed in the wind and turn which ever way the wind blows.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-18-06 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #62
69. By principle do you mean our Dem Party Platform? Do you oppose every
Democratic candidate who does not support 100% our party platform?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fudge stripe cookays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-18-06 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #69
77. Goddamn right I do.
This is a make or break for me, and anyone abandoning it does NOT get a check next to their name.

Wy exactly are you arguing so stringently FOR Blanco's vote? /sarcasm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 07:45 AM
Response to Reply #77
99. Many prominent Democrats oppose platform positions such as Ted Kennedy ,
Dianne Feinstein and Chuck Schumer who oppose our party's position that says, "We will protect Americans' Second Amendment right to own firearms". See http://www.democrats.org/pdfs/2004platform.pdf

I assume you support them so why do you pick and choose?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FredScuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #99
104. Who's taking away your gun?
Please, do tell which scary librul Dem you mentioned wants to take away your gun and your rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fudge stripe cookays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #104
106. Ah but see...
Jody is a male from Alabama, according to his profile.

I think that says about all we need to know; defending a position Dems find untenable, scared of having his guns taken away, and quel surprise...mud thrown at Ted Kennedy!

Do we NEED to say anymore to this idiot? Maybe he'll go away on his own. But I doubt it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #106
112. Is an ad hominine attack the best you can do? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FredScuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #112
122. BTW, it's "ad hominem" n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #122
127. The term is used with both spellings but thanks. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FredScuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #127
128. Really? Where?
Mr. Webster doesn't seem to recognize "ad hominine"

http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/ad%20hominine

Maybe you have some hip, updated dictionary us elitist abortion factory advocates aren't privy to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #128
130. Just google "ad hominine" and you'll see. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FredScuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #130
136. Just because it's used incorrectly in a lot of places
doesn't mean it's a valid alternate spelling.

Try googling "loose" as in "we've got nothing to loose"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #136
140. Thanks for the fun and games. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #140
143. The dictionary draws a blank on "ad hominine". Even a 12 year old knows
that you don't use Google as a spellchecker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #104
111. Reread #99. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FredScuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #111
120. You are ducking better that a WH Press Secy
Edited on Mon Jun-19-06 12:21 PM by FredScuttle
YOU, my friend, still haven't answered my question....how are Kennedy, Feinstein, et. al. advocating taking away your civil right to own a firearm? Spell out exactly how they are contradicting the plank in the party platform you reference:

"We will protect Americans' Second Amendment right to own firearms, and we will keep guns out of the hands of criminals and terrorists by fighting gun crime, reauthorizing the assault weapons ban, and closing the gun show loophole, as President Bush proposed and failed to do." (you left the bolded part out, by accident, I'm sure)

How are they contradicting or disobeying that? Hmmmmm?

Or, are you (as I suspect) equating supporting gun control with wanting a repeal of the 2nd Amendment? And, if that's the case, are you serious?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 12:22 PM
Original message
Please visit DU's Guns forum and read the numerous threads about
the efforts of Feinstein et al who wish to ban all handguns or all guns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FredScuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
126. No thanks
Edited on Mon Jun-19-06 12:31 PM by FredScuttle
I'd rather hear you quote one statement....ONE STATEMENT OR QUOTE...from Feinstein, Schumer or Kennedy in which they explicitly say "I wish to ban all guns in the United States" or "I advocate a repeal of the Second Amendment"

Your pro-gun, GOP-talking point blather is rather unconvincing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #126
129. OK, one quote and I win. Diane Feinstein said about guns "If I could have
gotten 51 votes in the Senate of the United States for an outright ban, picking up every one of them... "Mr. and Mrs. America, turn 'em all in," I would have done it. I could not do that. The votes weren't here." --U.S. Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), CBS- TV's "60 Minutes,"

Source is the Pink Pistols
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FredScuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #129
134. Fine....you win. Diane Feinstein is a nut
Edited on Mon Jun-19-06 12:56 PM by FredScuttle
I don't support her and I reject that statement if she was talking about all guns, not just assault weapons (a ban on which she sponsored around the time of that interview).

Now...why can't you do the same about Gov. Blanco instead of defending her?

on edit - by the way, referring to your source, don't you find it odd that a gay/lesbian site would have a section mocking Al Gore? Did they steal that from Rush's site?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #134
139. Blanco made a political choice in signing a bill. That's Dem politics at
the state level.

I wonder how many Dem candidates would get elected in Louisiana if they aggressively supported pro-choice on abortion? IMO very, very few.

I don't believe it's chance that NARAL reports the following for Louisiana:
* Governor Kathleen Blanco (D) is anti-choice.
* Lieutenant Governor Mitch Landrieu (D) is mixed-choice.
* Attorney General Charles C. Foti, Jr. (D) is anti-choice.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FredScuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #139
144. Hmmmm
I see your train of thought....kind of like how ridiculous it would be to get an NRA-endorsed candidate elected governor in kooky, librul Vermont. Er, um....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FredScuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #139
146. And another thing
You're the one who brought up Feinstein as contradicting the party platform, so if you have a problem with a Federal vs. State situation, it's of your own choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-20-06 01:53 AM
Response to Original message
166. No thanks
You pro-gun wack-jobs are from cloud-cuckoo land.

You're just too weird...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-20-06 06:45 AM
Response to Reply #166
171. You oppose the Dem Party Platform that says, "We will protect
Americans' Second Amendment right to own firearms". See http://www.democrats.org/pdfs/2004platform.pdf

It's sad that you can't support all inalienable rights including the right to keep and bear arms for self defense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fudge stripe cookays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #99
107. Because I don't give a shit about firearms.
And because I am a WOMAN. You weigh the party positions according to their importance to you.

Yeah, I'd like the amendment to be upheld, because we may need those guns down the road. But my civil rights are non-negotiable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #107
114. You know the right to keep and bear arms is a civil right, don't you? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fudge stripe cookays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #114
116. So is me calling the shots for my uterus.
But you don't seem to have a problem with them overturning that.

Ad hominem attacks come very easily when I'm faced with such a transparent person. What was your point in coming here, if not to stir the pot a bit?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #116
118. Where have I said I wanted to overturn your right to calling the shots for
your uterus?

I've been talking about Blanco's decision to sign a bill passed 25/0 by the senate and 85/17 by the house. That's a Louisiana issue not a National Democratic Party issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FredScuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #118
124. You haven't said you want to take away a woman's right to choose
but you're carrying water for a governor who just signed a bill into law doing exactly that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #124
131. My question was not to you. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FredScuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #131
138. but my statement was to you
if you don't want to respond to my assertion that you're carrying water for a governor who just signed a bill taking away a fundamental human right, that's your prerogative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #138
141. Goodby. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FredScuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #141
147. Giving up so soon?
You must be an absolute milquetoast on the Gun forums. I should venture over there...I'll have you mewling like a born-again Diane Feinstein.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fudge stripe cookays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #118
148. Fred beat me to answering your question.
And he did it very well.

Thanks Fred!
:hi: fsc
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FredScuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #148
149. Didn't mean to step on your toes, Fudge
Edited on Mon Jun-19-06 01:51 PM by FredScuttle
You're a lot closer to the situation at hand than I am!

:hi:

edit - waving back
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fudge stripe cookays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #149
151. No worries!
You're doing an excellent job. Thanks for that!
:D
fsc
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #148
153. Sorry but which post said I wanted to take away your right? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fudge stripe cookays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-20-06 05:07 AM
Response to Reply #153
168. All of them.
Agreeing with what she did and coming here to justify it says more than anything else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-20-06 06:39 AM
Response to Reply #168
170. You are wrong. I was discussing the reality of politics in Louisiana. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FredScuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-20-06 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #170
175. You posted that you support a governor taking away a woman's choice
Edited on Tue Jun-20-06 09:21 AM by FredScuttle
You can't possibly be this obtuse....you come on here applauding Blanco for having the "political skill" to sign a piece of shit legislation served up by a DINO legislature that tells the women of Lousiana that their uteruses now belong to the state and you're surprised when you're attacked? Ther reality here is that you're applauding a bill written by Neanderthals and signed by a craven fake Democrat. Congrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fudge stripe cookays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-20-06 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #170
178. Bull.
You are lauding her choice. Otherwise you would not be so vociferous about defending her here for her decision.

Get off it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-20-06 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #178
179. You just don't understand politics. Have a nice day and goodbye. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-18-06 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #22
86. Do you not even READ the bullshit you post?
That source called Kerry "pro-abortion", which is a flat-out LIE, since he specifically stated during the presidential debates that he is personally AGAINST abortion.

If you don't even read enough of your source to realize it's LYING about Democrats, what gives you the right to accuse others of not reading it?

And once again: majority rule does not trump civil rights.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 12:30 AM
Response to Reply #22
96. maybe she used a SIGNING STATEMENT like the resident
fuckhead has used over 750 times

(her signing statement wouldn't be for her personally but for all the women of LA)

winning, yes, i understand but can't we stand for anything on principle???

if she believes it and signed it may she find herself as an unexpected high risk pregnancy due to her AGE and other crucial factors!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bjorn Against Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #22
163. Any article that calls Kerry "pro-abortion" is useless.
Kerry is by no means my favorite politician, but to call him "pro-abortion" is quite simply a lie. He is personally opposed to abortion although he supports keeping it safe and legal. No one can find me a single quote of Kerry's in which he actually came out in favor of abortion, in fact I doubt anyone could find me a quote from ANY Democrat who has been on a national ticket that actually came out and said "people should have more abortions."

The use of the term "pro-abortion" is not only extremely loaded, it is quite simply a lie and that discredits the source as far as I am concerned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-20-06 05:27 AM
Response to Reply #163
169. What's this? A post from a sane person?
Thanks for sharing your SANITY in this thread. It's nice to meet people who can be critical of Kerry and other Democrats without being insane. I think you're the first one I've met on this board. Hi! Once again, nice to meet you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thickasabrick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-17-06 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #16
23. Actually, the "values" crap that people said was important to
them was never defined in the exit polls. The Anti-Choice people wanted to believe that it was all about abortion, so they took a page from uncle Karl's playbook and "made it so"....in their minds...and any type of propaganda they could distribute.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-17-06 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. IMO, the majority of LA voters oppose abortion except for unusual cases.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-18-06 12:24 AM
Response to Reply #25
39. Unusual cases
Like themselves, their wives, or daughters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FredScuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #25
125. Do you have any statistics to support that
or is that your gut feeling...kind of like Chris Matthews' gut feeling that people "really like" Dumbya?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #125
133. IMO means "In My Opinion". You might want to remember that. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FredScuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #133
137. Yes, I'm aware of that
You must know a lot of people in Louisiana to claim to represent their views on abortion in such detail. I was just wondering if you had anything....you know, like facts or evidence, to support that opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lars39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-17-06 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #16
24. Well, I read the article and these anti-abortion "Democrats"
can just go fuck themselves.
Trojan horse
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-17-06 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. OK but anti-abortion "Democrats" vote also. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wellst0nev0ter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-18-06 02:38 AM
Response to Reply #26
45. Then Fuck Their Votes Too
might as well fish for the vote of Fred Phelps. I hear he's still a registered Democrat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-17-06 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #16
28. I Take It That You Want The Dems To Abandon Our Pro-Choice Position…
…and adopt a more "moderate" position of banning all abortions. :puke:
Please pardon us if we don't rush to agree with you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-17-06 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #28
32. My point is Dems in each state must deal differently with divisive issues.
In Louisiana, the Senate voted 27 to 0 for the bill opposing abortion and the House approved it 85 to 17.

IMO Blanco correctly signed the bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #32
123. Then blacks would still be sitting in the back of the bus in your state.nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #123
132. My point is that absent a SCOTUS decision, each state must choose its
own course. That's why I support every inalienable right the same and expect the federal government to protect those rights against every form of oppression including state laws.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #132
145. There is one, Roe Vs Wade. My point is that backward leaning states
will never stand up for rights if left to their own devices.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #145
152. I understand but without a SCOTUS decision such as Roe, then each state
is left to decide such issues based on their own constitutions.

There are several states that have or are considering laws like Louisiana's anti-abortion law making them conditional upon SCOTUS overturning Roe. NARAL says, "As of June 18, 2006, legislatures in 14 states have considered or are considering abortion bans that would outlaw abortion in all or most circumstances: AL, GA, IN, KY, LA, MS, MO, OH, OK, RI, SC, SD, TN, WV. On June 13, the Ohio House of Representatives held a hearing on a bill that would ban abortion."

On any particular divisive, polarizing issue, each side calls the other names and that doesn't make for productive debate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunkerbuster1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #16
150. "in favor of all abortions,"?
Oh, that's a good one.

Yeah, that's us evil liberals, we want ALL PREGNANCIES TERMINATED! NOW!

what fucknuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greekspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-18-06 06:54 AM
Response to Reply #3
46. This black and white thinking of simply "majority rules" is NOT the way
The government has a responsibility to protect those among us whose freedoms are stripped from them. If "majority rules" every time, I can guarantee you that the cruel racial laws of the south would still exist today. I do not know if you are a man or a woman. Thus, I do not know if the government is trying to legislate what you can and cannot do with YOUR womb--all to please a religious demographic. I am a man, I of course have no womb. But I am a man who thinks women's wombs--like all the rest of women's bodies--belong to the women who carry them around. The majority want the government to own those wombs? Who gives a damn; the wombs do not belong to "the majority." And Blanco clearly hasn't the guts to acknowledge that. Instead she buckles like a crushed milk carton.

Another thing...please don't throw that "ooh, the pukes will win if we don't pass x legislation." That is RED legislation she signed. If bad law is signed into effect, does the party affiliation of the signer really matter? She should stand up for what is RIGHT and JUST, not just what will get her reelected and give a red state a pretty bluer veneer. If she looses her job for it, then too bad; maybe she could come back and try for a better job next election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-18-06 07:52 AM
Response to Reply #46
51. Majority rules unless a person's inalienable rights are threatened and
that's SCOTUS's job.

That's why many of us were concerned when * stole another election and gained the opportunity to stack SCOTUS with right wing judges.

The people who elected Blanco are not nearly as guilty as Dems across the nation who allowed * to have another four years in office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fudge stripe cookays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-18-06 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #51
78. Yes, MANY of us were concerned...
when * stole another election and gained the opportunity to stack SCOTUS with right wing judges because of THIS issue.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-18-06 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #51
88. "Majority rules unless a person's inalienable rights are threatened"
You mean, like a woman's inalienable right to control her own body?

Like I said, majority will doesn't trump that. It seems you fail to understand the concepts of "tyranny of the majority" and "protection of minority rights".

Get thee to a Constitutional primer!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-18-06 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #3
72. "My constituents don't support blacks voting."
Despicable - as if majority will trumps civil rights. Here's a clue: THEY DON'T, per the Constitution.

You should read it sometime.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-18-06 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #72
75. States routinely pass laws that violate the Constitution
Which make their way through the court system, sometimes even eventually to the Supreme Court, where they are more often than not overturned.

That's the way things work - there's no guarantee, in our democracy, that the rights of a minority are protected at the state level.

and -

why personalize this discussion with the snark? It's uncalled for.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-18-06 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #75
85. It's not snark, it's concern that a DUer doesn't understand civil rights.
Anyone arguing that majority rule somehow trumps civil rights clearly doesn't understand the Constitution.

And yes, bad, unconstitutional laws get passed - like the one Blanco signed. That doesn't negate the need to fight vociferously against them, of course.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 07:51 AM
Response to Reply #72
102. The U.S. constitution says in Amendment 14,
"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raccoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 07:48 AM
Response to Reply #3
101. Once they get into office, they don't really care what the constituents
want. They'll do what their donors want them to do and/or what is best for their political career, regardless of what party they belong to.

SOMETIMES they do what their constituents want, when it suits their convenience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #3
110. The same way a democratic president served the majority
by forcing them to integrate schools?

Sorry, no.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
159. No. Not at all. She has to do what is right. And that is protecting
the rights of women to make their own private medical decisions without interference from the state. This is an absolutely shameful vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Acadia Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-17-06 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. she is a Casey type democrat. A catholic. And she is under lots
of pressure from church leaders who whould treat her like they did Kerry, and of course the crazy fundis and catholics. Being in a red red state is difficult.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
finecraft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-17-06 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #10
21. Welcome to DU, and a big hello from New Iberia!
Glad you could join us Louisiana DU folks. It wasn't only the church leaders that treated Kerry like crap down here, Kathleen did her share of Kerry bashing too. It made my stomach churn when she said that she felt that she couldn't take him around Louisiana to places that would be a "natural fit" (insert Catholic) for him because of his "extreme liberal views". What a crock of crap. The breaking point for me was when her buddy Jim from the Shaw group (Republican turned Democrat for Kathleen's election) was named as the head of the Louisiana state Democratic Party. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Acadia Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-18-06 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #21
61. Hello to you also. I hope Blanco reads these posts so she knows
what many of us think about her actions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Megahurtz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #21
161. Lol hilarious cat butts! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adriennui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-18-06 07:45 AM
Response to Reply #10
49. if she can't stand the heat
let her get out of the f-ckin kitchen. abortion rights shouldn't even be an issue. if you don't want an abortion, don't have one.
i do not believe for a nanosec that these religious yahoos never had a wife, daughter, funded, or somehow been involved in someone having an abortion.

the hypocrisy is breathtaking.:banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :puke: :puke: :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-18-06 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #10
65. It's a good thing I repented my Catholocism. Should I ever...
run for public office, those child molesters will have NO sway over me whatsoever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jus_the_facts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #10
117. HERE ARE THE STATS.....LA STATE LEGISLATURE ISN'T RED......
.....IT'S MAJORITY *DEMOCRAT/DINO* :eyes:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/cu/cu.php?az=state&state=LA

State Senate
Democrats 24
Republicans 15
Other 0

State House
Democrats 67
Republicans 37
Other

:think:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-17-06 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. She has faith.
It'll never be used for the purpose written, why waste time haranguing over it.

But I'm sure it will be used during the next campaign for state-wide office, in many ways.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-18-06 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #13
89. Sure it will - this was written for at least two reasons.
1) Outlawing abortion in LA, should RvW ever be overturned (against the will of the majority of Americans)

and

2) to point at and say "See, even Democrats think abortion should be banned!"

If #2 isn't going to be used in this way, I'm the pope.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-17-06 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
27. Maybe it's to bribe the Administration and Congress to free up more
money for NOLA and the levies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jerry611 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-17-06 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
37. Not all Democrats are pro-choice
A woman I work with is flaming liberal on everything from the environment to being anti-war. But she is dead serious when it comes to abortion. She's 100% against it.

Just like I've known conservatives to be pro-choice.

Abortion is not limited to a political party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FredScuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-18-06 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #37
81. Conservatives who are pro-choice are reasonable
Liberals who oppose a woman's right to choose are fucking kidding themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #37
160. She's welcome to be 100% against it as a personal choice.
She's not welcome to restrict the rights of other women.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pitohui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-18-06 02:05 AM
Response to Reply #1
43. it's a catholic state, this is what the majority wants
there comes a time when i have to step aside since i am past child bearing age, if this is what the majority of women want and apparently it is, then whatever

i don't see how she could refuse to sign this in a catholic state really
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jus_the_facts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #43
119. Here are the demographics of our state legislature....
.....make of it what thou will?! :(

http://www.democraticunderground.com/cu/cu.php?az=state&state=LA

State Senate
Democrats 24
Republicans 15
Other 0



State House
Democrats 67
Republicans 37
Other
Males: 86 Percentage: 81.90%
Females: 18 Percentage: 17.14%
Whites: 82 Percentage: 78.09%
Blacks: 22 Percentage: 20.95%
Hispanics: 0


Women in the Senate (17.95%)
Senator Diana E. Bajoie
Senator Sharon Weston Broome
Senator Sherri Smith Cheek
Senator Ann Duplessis
Senator Lydia P. Jackson
Senator Willie L. Mount
Senator Julie Quinn


Minorities in the Senate (23.08%)
Senator Diana E. Bajoie
Senator Sharon Weston Broome
Senator Donald R. "Don" Cravins
Senator Ann Duplessis
Senator Cleo Fields
Senator Lydia P. Jackson
Senator Charles D. "C.D." Jones
Senator Edwin R. Murray
Senator Derrick Shepherd


Democrats in the Senate (61.54%)
Senator Robert Adley
Senator "Jody" Amedee
Senator Diana E. Bajoie
Senator Sharon Weston Broome
Senator Joel T. Chaisson, II
Senator Donald R. "Don" Cravins
Senator Ann Duplessis
Senator Reggie P. Dupre, Jr.
Senator Noble E. Ellington
Senator Cleo Fields
Senator "Nick" Gautreaux
Senator D. A. "Butch" Gautreaux
Senator Francis C. Heitmeier
Senator Donald E. Hines, M.D.
Senator Lydia P. Jackson
Senator Charles D. "C.D." Jones
Senator Robert "Rob" Marionneaux, Jr.
Senator Joe McPherson
Senator Willie L. Mount
Senator Edwin R. Murray
Senator Ben Nevers
Senator Derrick Shepherd
Senator Kenneth M. "Mike" Smith
Senator J. Chris Ullo


Republicans in the Senate (38.46%)
Senator Robert J. Barham
Senator Walter J. Boasso
Senator James David Cain
Senator Sherri Smith Cheek
Senator Jay Dardenne
Senator Heulette "Clo" Fontenot
Senator Ken Hollis
Senator Robert W. "Bob" Kostelka
Senator Arthur J. "Art" Lentini
Senator Max T. Malone
Senator Michael J. "Mike" Michot
Senator Julie Quinn
Senator Craig F. Romero
Senator John T. "Tom" Schedler
Senator Gerald J. Theunissen

http://senate.legis.state.la.us/senators/data.asp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-18-06 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
70. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
RB TexLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-20-06 02:18 AM
Response to Reply #1
167. She is a Democrat that is not pro-choice

There is no suprise here she has never been pro-choice
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-20-06 07:48 AM
Response to Reply #1
173. She is a pro-life Democrat
There are many of them, especially in the South and rural areas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madaboutharry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-17-06 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. What is wrong with her?
These faux democrats serving as governors and serving in the congress need to watch Gov. Janet Napolitano and how she gloriously sticks it to the wackos in Phoenix almost daily. Napolitano knows who she is and people respect her for that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pitohui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-18-06 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #4
71. she is not faux, she is real, however, this is a catholic state
i don't know if there are any other catholic states but louisiana is one and many democrats as well as many republicans oppose abortion as a matter of religious belief and heritage

many of our most loyal "yellow dog" democrats feel that abortion is genocide or that poor, young, black mothers are unfairly targeted to be encouraged to abort their babies, i don't agree, but that is what some people think, you cannot automatically in this state assume that a good loyal democrat is pro-choice

i don't like it, i think the decision should always be the woman's and not the state's, but i can't go around calling people "faux democrats" if they disagree because i would just be acting silly if i did
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-17-06 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
5. In the words of Frank from "Everybody Loves Raymond..."
"Holy crap!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-17-06 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
6. Don't forget Zell Miller was a Democrat. Threre are pro-choice
Republicans. Democrats aren't liberals, except for a few, they're politicans. Same as Republicans are not conservative, they simply use conservatives for their personal means.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thickasabrick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-18-06 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #6
82. But I'm trying so hard to forget Zell..... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drthais Donating Member (771 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-17-06 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
7. Blanco IS a Democrat, but...
just like Mary Landrieu,
she thinks that towing the conservative line
when there's no immediate penalty
is the 'safe' thing to do
it makes me furious (and I'm sure I'm not alone here in Louisiana)

you'd think we have ENOUGH problems right now
without the legislature wasting their time
with abortion and smoking bans and flag crap
we are suffering STILL from Katrina
and there are SO MANY important issues that need to be addressed
sometimes, I wonder what in hell these people in Baton Rouge are thinking

are they all just stupid or what?
and the voters are lazy too

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thickasabrick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-17-06 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. I think that people don't know. If our only news source was a
local paper.....would we be as appalled? I think one of our biggest challenges is educating the general population - especially lower income people that things will never get better unless they question and vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-17-06 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Landrieu is pro-choice.
Her famous debate line was something like "that's a decision between a woman, her doctor, and her God"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greenohio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-17-06 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #11
38. What she says and what she does are two different things.
Edited on Sat Jun-17-06 11:37 PM by greenohio
She voted YES on criminal penalty for harming unborn fetus during other crime.
She voted YES on banning partial birth abortions except for maternal life.
She voted YES on banning partial birth abortions.

Her NARAL percentage is 43%. Of course, thats better than Blanco, but its no hard core pro choicer either, since she votes pro-life over half the time.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-20-06 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #11
177. Apparently she isn't anymore
Perhaps his position on the issue 'evolved' as it has for other politicians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatFelyne Donating Member (68 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-18-06 01:40 AM
Response to Reply #7
42. why is Blanco playing it safe?
I'm a CT liberal that's been in grad school since just before the hurricanes, so my views are biased but I will share my opinion as an outsider observing the political situation here.

IMHO, a lot of this anti-abortion crap is just political posturing in an attempt to mitigate the blame that's been placed by the locals on these politicians for whats happened during and since the hurricanes. Pandering to the conservative base. And the timing is suspect as well. Think about it, Blanco signing this just as the hurricane season begins...hmmm

I am living in Baton Rouge, and I have seen NO pro-Dem signs, stickers on local properties or vehicles. The dems are being blamed for what has happened and what has not happened in regards to the hurricanes. Life is hard here in LA and no relief in sight. There is more people here, traffic is comparable to conditions I left up North, rents have increased tremendously, food gas commodities are more costly than ever. Not to mention the NIMBY attitude to the hurricane survivors. For a town that opened itself up to them, it appears they now are treating them like guests that have long overstayed their welcome. In a time where many have lost everything, there's an undercurrent of hostility and resentment.

The mayor openly stated he does NOT want any more shelters in Baton Rouge, does not want to be involved in housing evacuees during the next hurricane, he will not allow no more FEMA trailers in BR. In a way I understand part of the reasoning. We almost doubled our size overnight, and the infrastructure can't handle it. The help the town has requested has still not been forthcoming.

People want to blame someone, and Blanco is an easy target. Doesn't seem to be a lot of blame of the federal response, but a heck of a lot of blame on the local response.

In a time where so many have lost everything, they want to force people to have children they can't handle financially or emotionally. And add insult to injury forcing the rape and incest victims to have the baby. I feel for these people here, I really do. Nothing good can come of a ban here, nothing.

Honestly, I don't think any Democrat is safe here, especially Landreau and Blanco. I would not be a bit surprised if they weren't thrown out on their asses during reelection year, in fact that's what I expect will happen. In my opinion, Blanco sees the writing on the wall, and this abortion ban is a way to try appease the locals.

Playing it safe isn't going to make a difference now. Personally, I think she would have had nothing to lose by vetoing the bill, or refusing till there's an exception for rape and incest as well. Why, cause I think she's toast here, and she knows it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-18-06 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #42
90. I don't see how this can be considered playing it safe.
After all, if your distressing "the Dems are being blamed for stuff not getting done" news is true (and I have no reason to doubt you), this just looks like Blanco paying attention to matters less urgent than, say, food and shelter and jobs and rebuilding.

She's helping to foster the image of 'do-nothing Democrats' by doing this, as are the Dems who voted for it!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-20-06 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #7
176. LA Democrats are a bit less liberal than Democrats from most other states
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
williesgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-17-06 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
8. Fuck her. I hope she loses her next election to a real Democrat.
These people make me sick. If they don't want abortion, fine, don't have one. Stop legislating what others can or can't do. Put your religion back in church where it belongs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Acadia Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-17-06 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. I don't like what she did either, but you can imagine what a republican
replacement would be like! Foster the last rePIG gutted hospital services at Chairty to the very poor and good ole Bobby Jindal was the man who set it up. Republicans in Louisiana hate poor people and at least Blanco, conservative dem that she is, is not like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jus_the_facts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-18-06 08:41 AM
Response to Reply #12
57. This action of hers mimics her supposed nemesis to their very core...
Edited on Sun Jun-18-06 08:47 AM by jus_the_facts
....she IS JUST LIKE THEM when this action of hers advocates the creation of MORE POOR...the hypocrisy is disgusting and pathetically obvious that she's NOT THINKING at all about the poor by signing this into law...she has never seemed to me as being very bright...this proves it yet again! :eyes:

ON EDIT...but logically there has to be a lot of poor too keep getting these DINO's elected...so I guess she's not so retarded..afterall she NEEDS A BASE!! :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-17-06 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
15. Jay Leno, "Being a politican is what ugly people do to get movie star
power, status, prestige and money."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Danmel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-18-06 08:35 AM
Response to Reply #15
56. He should talk!
Seriously- this is disturbing, not just because Blanco is a Democrat (in theory, anyway) but because there is such overwhelming support for such a restrictive law. I understand that there is middle ground in this debate- I am pro-choice, but I don't think a pregnancy should be terminated late unless there is a compelling reason. And I have known women who have had compelling reasons and I fully understand why they made the decisions they did and would likely do the same if I were unfortunate in their situation.

I find it troubling though that such a large majority would completely deny women choice., even in cases of rape and incest. I would hope that there would be more sympathy for women in that situation, but apparently women deserve to be punished not only for consensual sex but for forced sex as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-18-06 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #56
64. What does that have to do with a Jay Leno joke? He was not talking
Edited on Sun Jun-18-06 01:11 PM by VegasWolf
about abortion. Most liberals are pro-choice, even Leno says that he is a socially liberal.

My point is that MOST politicians are like Blanco, neither conservative nor liberal. They are just Republicans or Democrats playing the role of conservatives or liberals and constantly polling the winds to determine which way to vote if they have not already sold that vote to the corporations and lobbyists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Danmel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-18-06 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #64
76. I just meant that he shouldn't comment about ugly people
and their career choices. He ain't exactly hot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-18-06 11:40 PM
Response to Reply #76
95. LOL. That's true enough. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-17-06 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
17. I guess the fat, pot-bellied, bible thumping, balding, low IQ Freepers
whose only birth-right is a pasty-white skin are overjoyed at this. The must be whacking their little mowhawk heads silly with their bibles. Imagine being stupid enough to believe that some god created the world in 7 days. It would have taken at least 38 days by my calulations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #17
154. You can include the Pope and his staff in those you hate because they also
oppose abortions. Of course most of them are not low IQ Freepers. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullimiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-17-06 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
19. i find myself not liking stuff blanco does, a lot.
i dont know or care what she is. i dont like it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-18-06 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #19
58. She is a wimp and should be turned out of office ASAP nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Isere Donating Member (920 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-17-06 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
20. EMILY'S LIST
is the proper response to this. Let's support truly pro-choice Democratic women who will stand up for privacy and freedom from government intrusion.

You know what to do. Click away: http://emilyslist.org/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-17-06 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
30. She's a traitor to all who value civil rights.
NT!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jus_the_facts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-18-06 07:13 AM
Response to Reply #30
47. Thank You....I've said it time and time again....but get flamed anyway....
....they vote their faith *GAG*...or because La. is soooo conservative they HAVE to vote against the *PARTY* who actually got them elected..eventhough there is a MAJORITY DEMOCRAT STATE LEGISLATURE...blah blah blah...I make NO EXCUSES for the traitors of the ideology they proclaim to uphold yet sell out time after time. :evilfrown: :nopity:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-18-06 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #30
83. Yes She Is
Disgusting...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LuckyLib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-17-06 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
36. Of all the stuff on the plate of the state of Louisiana, the
LAST thing on the pea-brained minds of the legislature should be abortion. They should be ashamed. Get your butts in gear and start demanding the kind of national support you should have had from BushCo from the beginning. Quit pandering to extraneous shit like flags, gay marriage, and abortion and GET DOWN TO BUSINESS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Flaming Red Head Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-18-06 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
54. You know what sucks

Prenatal care in Louisiana (for one thing), their social service network, their educational system (always ranks 50th). I had my son in one their teaching (charity) hospitals and I was damn lucky they even let me in, in time to give birth.

You see a state that won’t even provide water when its citizens are dying of thirst and you wonder how anybody could call themselves pro-life (dems or reps) in that place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AzDar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-18-06 08:29 AM
Response to Original message
55. A woman's right to choose is NON-negotiable IMNSHO. Blanco
should have taken a stand; especially considering the fact that she seems to be pro-choice. If her veto were overridden,so what?
Another 'Dry-Powder' Democrat we don't need.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTLawGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-18-06 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
59. My feelings on this can be summed up
by the soundtrack at this site (it may take a min or so to start)

http://www.thesahara.net/deliverance.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donsu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-18-06 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
60. another faux democrat - may she acquire chronic vaginal itch
Edited on Sun Jun-18-06 09:41 AM by donsu
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kayell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-18-06 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
63. She was going to hand out souvenier coat hangers, in place of pens, but
the order didn't come in on time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HockeyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-18-06 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
67. Have they ever seen the results of Incest?
There is a reason why in nearly all societies incest is banned. No, we are not talking about morals here, but genetics. I would like to suggest that every person who is advocating banning abortion for incest victims spend a day at a institution for the mentally and physically impaired.

I work with one 32 year old man from a father/daughter conception and a 35 year old man and a 40 year old woman from a brother/sister conception (same parents).

All are classified as profoundly retarded and extremely physically disabled. Their parents have abandoned them and because of their disabilities nobody ever adopted them. They all require round the clock care. They show no human emotions whatsoever. The only thing I can say about "Joey" (father/daughter) is that any domesticated animal is higher functioning, mentally and physically, than he is. I will not even go into the physical aspects of Joey's deformities, only to say they are both simian and reptile. I am not saying this to be cruel. It is a simple fact and a very sad one at that. All three are Wards of the State to the tune of $10 Million Dollars each.

Once again, in their zealotry and ignorance, these people are advocating more of these births. The place where I work is very, very short staffed. Everyone keeps quitting. It is neither an easy, nor financially rewarding occupation. I shudder to think what will happen if even more of these "clients" are forced by these abortion bans to be born.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thickasabrick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-18-06 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #67
84. There was a story about those outlaw mormon people who
just keep inbreeding. There are kids who are born that have no muscle function whatsoever, they just lay there their entire lives and the sect takes care of them. It's really creepy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donsu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #67
108. in Md. where I raised my kids was an incestous family. local teachers


said they got either brainless kids or really smart ones. but they all had pointed teeth. no shit. went to school with my kids.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-18-06 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
94. Nice work, Governor Coat Hanger.
And that's really all I've got to post about that, except:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 12:39 AM
Response to Original message
97. Obvious pandering and not about protecting women's rights
:puke:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hopeisaplace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
115. Cameras in ALL Bedrooms please.
We cannot risk COITUS INTERRUPTUS.
All those caught pulling out will be hauled off. :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Megahurtz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
135. Fucking Bitch!
:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superconnected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
142. This is a symptom of a much bigger epidemic.
Edited on Mon Jun-19-06 01:41 PM by superconnected
There is no country on Earth that impedes womens rights and allows gays to exist.

The immigration focus that turns to hatred (ie deciding they take your job), womens rights assult and gay discrimination are interconnected and coming from the same bigotry.

The attack on these groups will affect all other minorities, blacks included.

Once you give give permission for bigotry, all bigotry rises.

Society is going to keep fliping between minorities to hate while acceptance to bigotry is tolerated. There's no greater show of a countrys bigotry tolerance than the public declarations of politicians. They are who we elect. They speak for us. They make our laws. I suspect I will keep reading Du'ers themselves pick on minorities while not seeing that they are helping the bigotry that will eventually turn on us all - as antibush dems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
157. I remain flabbergasted that any politician possessing a uterus...
can place someone else's in chains.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mad_Dem_X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-20-06 07:18 AM
Response to Reply #157
172. I will never understand
how anyone, especially a woman, can pass legislature of this kind - denying abortions even to rape and incest victims!!! :wtf: :nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-20-06 01:47 AM
Response to Original message
164. Coward isn't she!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donsu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-20-06 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #164
180. yes, a coward
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 04:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC