.....refusing to reimburse the US Postal Service for lost revenue secondary to federally mandated reduced mail rates, and by refusing a US Postal Service budget request for $779 million for the biotech equipment to detect anthrax and ricin....
All of this contributes to workers who feel the economic crunch and a sense of fatalism and demoralization. That, unfortunately may lead to to mail theft out of anger, despair and desperation. This is what happens when people are continually stripped of their dignity by this callous, rapacious, and unbridled administration.
We have so much to credit this administration for. (/sarcasm) And this is certainly a part of it. We all lose, in the face of what this administration is doing.
Some examples:
IGNORING POSTAL SECURITY: Despite anthrax and ricin attacks through the mail, Congressional Quarterly reported that "the president's $37 million budget request in 2005 for the U.S. Postal Service does not include $779 million for bio detection technology the agency had sought to safeguard against anthrax-like attacks."
http://www.americanprogress.org/site/pp.asp?c=biJRJ8OVF&b=43926 Budget and the US Postal Service: Reform
On the topic of the United States Postal Service, the administration’s budget document called for postal reform legislation. Specifically, it said:
The Administration continues to strongly support efforts to enact comprehensive postal reform legislation that fosters a healthy Postal Service for future generations. The US Postal Service provides an important service to the American people and the economy, and the Administration believes that the Postal Service should continue providing affordable and reliable universal service, while limiting exposure to taxpayers and operating appropriately in the competitive marketplace.
Postal reform must be accomplished in a responsible manner that is fair to taxpayers, ratepayers, and Postal Service employees. It must be consistent with the principles of best governance practices, transparency, flexibility, accountability, and self-finance, as expressed by the President in December 2003, and not have an adverse impact on the Federal budget.
To this end, the Administration supports reforms that: allow the Postal Service pricing flexibility, but within a firm annual Consumer Price Index rate cap and with a strict limit on the circumstances when rates can exceed the cap; require compliance with all Securities and Exchange Commission financial reporting standards; and permit greater flexibility in the use of negotiated service agreements and worksharing arrangements.
In addition, the 2007 Budget proposes to use the pension savings provided to the by the Postal Civil Service Retirement System Funding Reform Act of 2003 (P.L. 108-18) that would otherwise be held in escrow in 2006 and beyond, to put the Postal Service on a path that fully funds its substantial retiree health benefits liabilities.http://www.the-dma.org/cgi/dispnewsstand?article=4430+++++ For the U.S. Postal Service, which generally does not get taxpayer dollars for its operations, the administration proposes to stop reimbursing it, as required by law, for lost revenue attributable to legislatively mandated reduced mail rates. Congress in 1994 had authorized $1.2 billion to repay the USPS in $29 million increments. Bush proposes to end the $29 million appropriation because "USPS is now benefiting from pension savings of approximately $3 billion per year" as a result of other legislation to re-estimate its pension costs.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A42369-2005Feb21.html