Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Nigerian wanted a cut, tape says (Jefferson Probe)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
funkybutt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 08:27 AM
Original message
Nigerian wanted a cut, tape says (Jefferson Probe)
http://www.nola.com/news/t-p/frontpage/index.ssf?/base/news-5/1149574250298360.xml&coll=1

Unsealed probe records quote Jefferson identify vice president

WASHINGTON -- Rep. William Jefferson told a business associate that the vice president of Nigeria was demanding half the profits of a telecommunications partnership the congressman was involved with, according to court records unsealed Monday.

-snip-

He also told her in a separate wiretapped call that YahYah was critical to the success of the venture in Nigeria.

"We need him," Jefferson told her over dinner in Washington. "We got to motivate him real good. He's got a lot of folks to pay off."

-snip-

"If he's gotta pay Minister X, we don't want to know," Jefferson said. "It's not our deal. We're not paying Minister X a damn thing. That's all, you know, international fraud crap. We're not doing that. . . . Whatever they do locally, that's their business."

*comment* they sure are releasing a lot of "evidence" for a case that hasn't even gone to indictment yet. Anyone know what that's about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
1. The article explains well enough.
The court agreed to unseal information used to justify a search of the Nigerian minister's residence in question in relation to the Jefferson probe. Apparently they used Jefferson's perceived corruption as the justification in this case. So who's "they"? Because you seem to be arguing the FBI released this information on its own as propaganda. You realize that court proceedings aren't supposed to be secret by default in the United States, right? At least before this Guantanamo business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
funkybutt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. not arguing really
I'm just curious. The media requested that the information be released. I guess, my main question is why hasn't he been indicted. Isn't this unusual to have so much information about a case before an indictment?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Not when the media's asking for this in a high profile case.
In a case like this only things like national security considerations might make courts reluctant to deal with this in the public domain. There's no such considerations here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Uh, large portions of the affidavit were redacted before release.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
3. A lot of European countries have played
footsie by offering bribes. Frequently the governments turn a blind eye to it; but in the case of some high profile companies, they've been indicted. I think Volkwagen was one of them. Again, involving Nigeria, where corruption and bribery are rampant.

Some US firms have also been accused, and some, IIRC, also indicted.

The argument against indictment is that some other large countries have no problem with bribery, and get the business. Hence some European governments have traditionally looked the other way.

The argument for indictment is that we're supposed to be better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueInPhilly Donating Member (341 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
5. He said he was a prince...
with money locked away in a Swiss bank account! And all Jeff wanted to do was try to get his money back. Yeah, that's what it was!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TX-RAT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. LOL, too funny
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fight_n_back Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
7. Its why you should never answer Nigerian SPAM
We've all gotten the EMail from the Nigerian millionaire who needs youir help to launder his money. One would have hoped that a member of the US House of Representatives could have seen throught the scam.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC