Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Woman Ordered To Change Anti-Bush T-Shirt Before Sentencing

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 01:26 PM
Original message
Woman Ordered To Change Anti-Bush T-Shirt Before Sentencing
CLEVELAND -- A woman convicted of assaulting Cleveland Heights police officers appeared in court for sentencing Friday morning, but the sentencing was delayed when the judge said she must change her clothes, NewsChannel5 reported.

Carolyn Fisher was arrested in February when she was hanging up anti-President George W. Bush posters. Officers said the woman attacked them when they ordered her to take down the posters.

Fisher was convicted of two count of felony assault against a police officer. She and her supporters showed up for her sentencing wearing anti-Bush T-shirts, but the judge deemed the attire inappropriate.

Judge Timothy McGinty said he had no problem with people protesting the war or the president, but that the courtroom was not the place to express those views.

http://www.newsnet5.com/news/9312729/detail.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
asthmaticeog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. God damn, when fuck is enough going to be enough with McGinty?
Please tell me he's elected and not appointed - I'm ITCHING to vote against that piece of trash. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
29. He is scum
And so is this creature

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fshrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. Everybody should ne naked in the Court room:
That would make trials really balanced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stop the bleeding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. it might make it difficult for some people to concentrate
but hell I'll try anything now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
personman Donating Member (959 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
3. Unleash the ACLU...
Edited on Fri Jun-02-06 01:38 PM by personman
Been waiting, this whole case has seemed like the kind of thing they would jump all over.

This "judge" Timothy McGinty sounds like a real piece of human garbage, surely that can't be legal?

-personman

Edit: I'm a civil libertarian and a PROUD card-carrying ACLU member. Join and donate to the ACLU! Help the REAL "Fight for Freedom."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
4. Why Would Police Order Someone To Take Down Political Posters?
Am I missing the point here somewhere, or is the Man?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
High Plains Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
5. This whole case has been a disgrace from day one.
This 5'2", 100-lb. woman was hanging posters on telephone poles when the cops arrested her. They then charged her with two counts of felony assault after scuffling. The judge committed her to a mental hospital for evaluation. Now, she faces three years in prirson.

But hey, nevermind, she's a commie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
speedingbullet Donating Member (133 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
6. 1st Amendment
As lawyer who has studied the Constitution I think Ms. Fisher has a right to wear the t-shirt. As a criminal defense lawyer I think her choice of attire was not very bright. Brave yes, but not bright.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
medeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. isn't there a dress code in court?
used to be in the old days
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. no, there isn't.
never was, either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Excuse me?
My guess is you haven't been in too many courtrooms over the years....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. you can dress however you like- there's no law that dictates it...
Edited on Fri Jun-02-06 02:15 PM by QuestionAll
but it's generally not good form to dress in a way that's disrespectful to a judge.

and no, i haven't been in a lot of courtrooms- but the ones i have been in have often been full of some fairly shabby and/or casual dressed people- especially in traffic court in august.

it may vary from state to state, i would assume, and i might expect "dress codes" might be popular in some of the back-ass-ward southern states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Some judges will kick you right out of their courtroom
How much latitude they have might depend on tradition, local or possibly state rules- though some are just arbitrary. It's not uncommon to see dress "codes" forbidding certain attire posted in courthouses- although the judge often has the discertion to go beyond what's posted.

In LA County for example, there was on judge who used to insist that the women attorney's wear skirts. This went on for quite some time before "he got his," so to speak.

I forgot the guy's name so I did a quick search and came up with another judge who did the same thing.

A women no less! (and a Republican, of course).

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/dres30.shtml

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Spock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #17
32. That's crazy
I can't believe some of these things happen in America.

Lawyers "request" that you dress nicely to get favorable treatment here in Boston, but I've never ever heard of these nutcase judges who require it - how unAmerican!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #15
27. A judge can basically do whatever they want
in running their courtroom, as far as "civilities."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Free speech does not apply in a court room. A judge has the right
to do what he must to maintain decorum in the court room. And actually I agree with not allowing T shirts with political slogans. Otherwise court proceedings could degenerate into political free for alls and it would be impossible to conduct a fair trial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #8
28. Me too.
And I'm quite fond of civil liberties.

I even agree with the judge on this. It's his job to keep to the issue at hand. When people try to start sideshows, it goes against justice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #8
34. Larry Flynt wore a diaper once in court if I'm not mistaken....
Edited on Fri Jun-02-06 06:10 PM by EVDebs
""Also in 1983, during a trial about his refusal to disclose the source of surveillance tapes potentially embarrassing to the FBI, he wore an American flag as a diaper and was subsequently jailed for six months for desecration of the flag.""

http://www.answers.com/topic/larry-flynt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #8
37. Free speech doesn't apply in the United States.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. That's probably incorrect
Edited on Fri Jun-02-06 01:53 PM by depakid
Judges are generally afforded a good deal of latitude to enforce dress codes and decorum in their courtrooms, including what might look like arbitrary decisions in certain cases.

This may well be one of those.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wizdum Donating Member (531 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #6
36. I agree with the point you're making...
...I am not familiar with the case or this judge, but the last thing I would want to do if convicted of two felonies is antagonize the judge who was preparing to sentence me. Even if I was not apologetic, I would pretend I was. I would behave contritely since he has the authority to throw the book at me.

As for the anti Bush tee shirts that she and her supporters wore, the judge could perhaps make a case that they were conducting on unauthorized protest in his courtroom. Although I agree with the message of this woman and her supporters, it can be argued that their behavior is extreme. It's important to stay out of jail so that you can keep getting your message across.

However, having said that, I am glad to hear there is some hard core opposition to Bush, his administration and the war in Ohio.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
11. Judges do get testy about attire.
I've seen young women wearing shorts & flip-flops told to return another day--in traffic court. The question: Has the judge allowed informal wear that is NOT anti-Bush?

When Jenna Bush appeared in an Austin courtroom (without any family), I remember thinking she looked a bit sloppy.

The case, itself, is another matter.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kikosexy2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
14. Maybe she ...
should have worn a T-Shirt that said Buck Fush! Police state..police state..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sgent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
16. We've got a judge here
who refuses to swear in a witness / seat a defendant unless they are in at least a collared shirt and slacks (or nicer), with no tennis shoes allowed.

If you don't own a sufficient outfit, a local clothing bank will give you the clothes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuffleClaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
18. TEXTBOOK dirty cop tactics
and they most always find a small person, often a woman to pick on too, just like any other bully.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
the other one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
19. I respect the judge's right to manage his courtroom
As long as he is consistent in his application, I have no problem with him demanding that people entering the courtroom respect the gravity of the situation. If I was a judge I would probably send home anyone who didn't at least try to look like they knew they were in court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
20. I guess a Black Robe is proper attire, though.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gregorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
21. I guarantee he would have accepted a pro-Bush shirt.
No ifs ands or buts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mvd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #21
35. Exactly
This judge better be watched for how he treats shirts with a message in the future..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sweetheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
22. Institutional degneneration and ignorance
The courts are less aware of the constitution than my dog is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
23. umm- so this woman attacked SEVERAL officers? Was she a slayer? Faith?
Was that you?The indictment itself reeks of frame-up!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seriousstan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
24. This woman has brought it all upon herself from the very beginning.
She is trying to send a message and make a point. She is succeeding, but after a point the message changes. Soon any message she tried to send will be lost in the fact that she doesn't know how to act when in a situation that demands decorum.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
High Plains Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #24
42. Yeah, right. She wanted to get sent to prison for three years for
hanging up anti-Bush political posters. And yes, I'm sure this 100-lb. woman viciously attacked the cops who were hassling her. And she must have been crazy--why else would the judge order her sent for a mental evaluation.

And you criticize her for a lack of decorum? Sheesh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
25. Judges are pissy about their courtrooms
one time when I was in court (as an observer) during the boring crap I was looking at a newspaper. The bailiff came over to me and said if I didn't put it away the judge was going to throw me out of the courtroom. :-( Another time someone got in trouble for chewing gum and another person was kicked out cause they fell asleep. Judges rule those rooms like little gods.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superconnected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. That happens all the time. I worked for a courthouse and often
Edited on Fri Jun-02-06 04:52 PM by superconnected
had to wait on a bench for court to subside so I could get to their computers.

People got in trouble for everything - putting feet on the benches, reading, listening to head phones, taking a call, etc. It was more the women who worked there that would send a post-it note to the person doing the action, than the actual judge doing it.

I did see a few very ugly interactions between judge and defendant though. One went totally off on a guy who was claiming an auto accident wasn't his fault but admitted fault at the scene. The judge and the man got really into it and after court the judge actually appologized to me, for him losing it and me having to watch.

They're human.

Ah, there was one court - I believe it was mental health court (we had about 15 courts). In that court you could do anything. But it was because the place degraded several times a day to screaming, crying, yelling, etc. anyway.

I'm a systems admin/network tech.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #25
33. Yup, judges get to wear what THEY want! Check this story out!
Edited on Fri Jun-02-06 05:46 PM by calipendence
This judge was proud of wearing a robe with the 10 commandments plastered on it!

http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2004/12/alabama_judge_wears_ten_commandments_on_robe/

Sheesh! He can wear that and someone who's standing before a court awaiting sentencing can't wear what they want?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noel adamson Donating Member (353 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
30. This has a lot to do with why our prisons are full* and criminals are
walking free. Dress code violations, political dissent and ethnic discrepancies (AKA "profiling") are the reason people are targeted by police in the first place. Judges are just the next step on the assembly line.

*http://www.kcl.ac.uk/depsta/rel/icps/worldbrief/highest_to_lowest_rates.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AbbyR Donating Member (734 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
31. Dress code?
I know that a girl I used to work with was told to change clothes when she went to court in a culotte-type skirt that looked like knee-length shorts. The judge said she couldn't wear shorts in court. Don't know about Bush t-shirts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pokercat999 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
38. The president of the US is a war criminal and this
"judge" is worried about what the defendant wears to court? I am starting to understand the purges and assignations by communist takeovers in the USSR, Cuba and elsewhere. If push came to shove, and bush would not leave the presidency at the end of his term then had to be removed by force; I could understand the complete cleansing of the gov't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 02:49 AM
Response to Original message
39. isn't this the same a**hole judge who ordered her to undergo a psych
eval, saying she must be crazy to be opposed to *???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Lane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 05:32 AM
Response to Original message
40. Supreme Court decision in Cohen v. California
The case of Cohen v. California, 403 U.S. 15 (1971), concerned a man who was arrested for being in a courthouse while wearing a jacket that displayed the words "Fuck the Draft". The Supreme Court held (on a 5-4 vote) that prosecuting him for that was unconstitutional.

That doesn't mean that you can wear absolutely anything you please in court. The decision in Cohen stated that, "absent a more particularized and compelling reason for its actions, the State may not, consistently with the First and Fourteenth Amendments, make the simple public display here involved of this single four-letter expletive a criminal offense." By contrast, if someone were wearing clothing that might improperly influence the jury in a trial, guarding against that danger might be a sufficiently "particularized and compelling reason" for the restriction.

In this case, though, the article says that the woman was being sentenced. There was no jury to be affected.

Some people here have raised the point about how the judge treats other slogans. The proper inquiry might be broader than that: how the judge treats other t-shirts. Banning all t-shirts might be legitimate in the name of court decorum. Banning only those with political slogans (even if right-wing and left-wing slogans were treated equally) might be unconstitutional.

text of decision in Cohen
Wikipedia article about the case

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-10-06 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #40
44. I have some bad news about this judge
He ran on the Democratic Party ticket in the primary. Did not have any opposition in the General Election that I could determine.

He was elected in 2004 and terms for Common Pleas Court Judge is 6 years.

Another avenue of attack on this is the Chair of the Cuyahoga County Democratic Party.

Reading other article(s) about this judge he does not appear to favor defense attorneys. He was a former prosecutor before he was elected in 1992.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Algorem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
41. see in photo local activist Art McKoy was with her at court; maybe she'll
Edited on Sat Jun-03-06 11:31 AM by Algorem
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
petgoat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-10-06 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
43. Update on Carol Fisher

Here are a few things you might want to know:

1. Carol is doing well and would love to hear from you. To send her a letter, please write to:
Carol Fisher
Prisoner # SO0257713
1215 W. 3rd St.
Cleveland OH 44113

2. Carol had prescriptions for various medications when she entered jail. She has not yet recieved any of them. You can call the jail to demand her prescriptions be filed at 216-443-6000

3. Yesterday, Carol was reading aloud to another inmate from a book that she took into jail with her. "From Ike to Mao and Beyond: My Journey from Mainstream America to Revolutionary Communist," A Memoir by Bob Avakian. As the reading was going on, the other inmate leaned against Carol's arm as she was intently listening to the story. A corrections officer then reported this as an "incident" (prisoners are not allowed to TOUCH each other), and they were threatened with lockdown!

4. An appeal of her conviction has been filed, and we are awaiting the outcome of this.



WHAT YOU CAN DO:

*Donate to Carol's legal defense. It costs a lot of money to get transcripts, file appeals, etc. Make checks payable to “Carol Fisher Defense Fund” and mail to “NION/WCW PO Box 609034 Cleveland, OH 44109.

*Call Judge Timothy McGinty and express your outrage: 216-443-8758

*Get your legal organization to be part of Carol's defense: make statements, file friend of the court briefs, etc.

*Have your church group, school group, organization or club join this battle by sending statements of support, donating funds, etc.

*Put this poster up to show public support and spread the word.

*Request radio stations play any of the following songs, dedicate it to Carol Fisher and explain what is going on with her case:
Tom Petty’s “Won’t Back Down”
Pearl Jam’s “World Wide Suicide”
Pink’s “Dear Mr President”
Neil Young’s “Let’s Impeach the President”

*Write letters to the editor of:
The Cleveland Plain Dealer. Go to website: www.cleveland.com\plaindealer\lettertoeditor
The Cleveland Free Times. Email: editor@freetimes.com
The Sun Press. Email: sun@sunnews.com

*Send this article to your list serves and post to blogs.

*Join the World Can't Wait- Drive Out the Bush Regime!
Contact: World Cant Wait, Cleveland 216-633-6200
PO Box 609034 Cleveland OH 44109
Cleveland@worldcantwait.org
www.worldcantwait.org

http://worldcantwait.net/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1679&Itemid=61



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 03:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC