Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT/Reuters: GAO Auditors Fault Missile Defense Plans

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-01-06 07:54 PM
Original message
NYT/Reuters: GAO Auditors Fault Missile Defense Plans
Auditors Fault Missile Defense Plans
By REUTERS
Published: June 1, 2006

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States has spent about $91 billion since the mid-1980s to defend against enemy ballistic missiles, but it has no clear criteria for deciding to use the system and its operational costs remain unclear, the Government Accountability Office said on Thursday.

The missile defense system, which the Bush administration had hoped to have ready by 2004, is designed to help protect the United States against missiles that could carry nuclear, chemical or germ warheads.

The GAO, the non-partisan, investigative arm of Congress, urged the Pentagon to draw up standards that each component and the overall ballistic missile defense system must meet before they can be used, just as other major weapons programs do.

It also recommended that the Department of Defense set up a new structure to identify all the costs of operating the missile defense system, some of which are now being funded with research money, and report them to Congress.

Underscoring the cost and significance of the program to U.S. national defense, GAO suggested that lawmakers pass legislation requiring the Pentagon to actually act on its recommendations....

http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/news/news-arms-usa-missiles.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
flyingfysh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-01-06 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. The missile system is working perfectly!
It is doing very well at its goal of getting lots of money to military contractors. And it can do this without ever being used.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FtWayneBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-01-06 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. Even though the missile defense systems have failed all tests,
they continue to be funded. The GAO is wondering why.
Can you say "military-industrial-polecat political complex?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShockediSay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-01-06 11:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. One big boondoggle for government contractors
w/ heavy handed lobbyists.

Who cares if it wouldn't be half as effective as an umbrella in a hurricane? It moves bags of money to our congressional crooks and back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 01:02 AM
Response to Original message
4. This is such a money pit, good to see the GAO investigating though...
...not that it will do any good, they won't listen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 01:41 AM
Response to Original message
5. Next to Iraq this is the biggest fucking waste in the history of the USA
Every god damn person who has drawn a paycheck from this criminal enterprise should be thrown in jail.
EVERY single pocket protector shit for brains who ever filled out a timecard on a star wars account number should be forced to pay it back to the general fund with interest.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 12:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC