Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senate Votes Twice for English Language

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 08:45 AM
Original message
Senate Votes Twice for English Language
WASHINGTON - Whether English is America's "national language" or its national "common and unifying language" was a question dominating the Senate immigration debate.

The Senate first voted 63-34 to make English the national language after lawmakers who led the effort said it would promote national unity.

But critics argued the move would prevent limited English speakers from getting language assistance required by an executive order enacted under President Clinton. So the Senate also voted 58-39 to make English the nation's "common and unifying language."

"We are trying to make an assimilation statement," said Sen. Lindsey Graham (news, bio, voting record), R-S.C., one of two dozen senators who voted Thursday for both English proposals.


The article continues at http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060519/ap_on_go_co/immigration

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
1. dumb asses......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
2. Why not just vote for national unity? It means as much.
Calling english a national language doesn't make it so. Calling it common and unifying doesn't make it so. It's an expression of hope, I guess, at best. Therefore why not just make a wish of national unity and see if we all end up speaking one language? Blow out the candles and squeeze your eyes shut tight, senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
30. Reminds me of Abe Lincoln's joke
Calling a tail a leg, how many legs does a dog have?

Five?

Four. Calling a tail a leg doesn't make it one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TAPat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
3. Don't these people have anything better
to do? Gee Whiz :eyes:

BTW - Wanted you to know that I always read & enjoy your posts! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 08:51 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Like outlawing equal marriage?
And thanks for your kind words :blush:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
5. The Salazar amend. is the one for "Unifying" ut the important part is
that his was voted on after the Inhofe amendment--the difference between the 2? The Salazar amend. includes--"Non-english speakers will not be punished".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rkc3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. That was done to protect bush - since he barely speaks the language.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dyedinthewoolliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
6. Boy am I relieved!
:sarcasm: I lay awake nights thinking "I sure hope the Senate addresses the nasty question of a national language. Everyone I know is talking about it!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkos refugee Donating Member (48 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #6
39. sarcasm?
I hear it all the time. People in this country should be able to speak and understand english. It's not too much to ask.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catnhatnh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
7. "You will be assimilated...."
...The Borg collective,or Lindsey Graham???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
9. This is just more pre-election con-artistry to rile up Repug fringers (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
10. Oh crap does this mean that Bush has to resign?
:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
One_Life_To_Give Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
11. Can argue it already said laguage is english
If english is not the official language then we should ask why the Code of Federal Regulations has requirements for certain information and text to be in english but no other language.

Seems to me we tell people english is not mandatory. But never do anything that would not make a non-english speaking/reading person a second class citizen. Unless the intent is to make a permanent slave class out of the non-english speaking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. I also note that the Code of Federal Regulations is itself written in
English, and only English, AFAIK.

What is our common language, if NOT English, I wonder??????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jerry611 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #11
21. Or they could learn english perhaps????
And I would say that english is mandatory. You can't get a medium or high paying job without knowing how to speak english. If they continue to refuse learning English, they will be stuck picking fruit or flipping burgers.

Their choice...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
12. And they voted to fund free ESL classes throughout the country!
Surely they did?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ugarte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Haha...nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eowyn_of_rohan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #12
28. The free ESL classes are indirectly referred to....
"The measure declares that there is no affirmative right to receive services in languages other than English, except where required by federal law".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. Ah, "The White Lady of Rohan"
How do you say that in Rohirric?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eowyn_of_rohan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. Ah, Bridget, the Ephemeral
you're here, then Poof! gone again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. I'm still here.
Edited on Fri May-19-06 01:36 PM by Bridget Burke
In fact, I asked you a question, farther down the thread.

Weren't many dwellers in Middle Earth multilingual?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eowyn_of_rohan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #31
38. You are so full of questions
and I doubt you are interested in the answer to this one, or you would look it up yourself, but in the Rohirric language Eowyn would probably be Lo/Loho-wyn. I am not an expert on Rohirric language, but I did give myself a crash course in French (to supplement my high-school French), so that I could converse reasonably well when I traveled in France.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TlalocW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
14. After this
Maybe they can move on to their other important work such as declaring the sun our main source of energy, proposing a national law mandating that living people must breathe, and that we must obey the law of gravity.

TlalocW
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. "We must obey the law of gravity"
Except when President-For-Life Bush deems the law of gravity to be inconsistent with national defense and the War on Terruh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #16
23. Just Observer Dear Leader's Bike Riding
He's still defying gravity after all these years!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. Which is within his powers as unitary executive n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jerry611 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
17. Someone please explain to me why this is bad?
When immigrants come here, why is it so wrong to make them learn our language? Why does it become a requirement for us to learn theirs?

Now I agree that learning other languages is good and helps you understand other cultures, but I don't see how it is right to force Americans to learn it.

It should not be our problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sidpleasant Donating Member (376 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. When were you required to learn another language?
What were the circumstances, and how exactly was the requirement worded? Was the requirement a local ordinance or state law? Did you challenge it in court and if so, did you lose? What was the punishment for failure to learn a second language? Were you permitted to learn any second language you liked, or were you forced to learn a specific language? Where did this "forced to learn another language" incident happen? I can't recall hearing of any place in the US where bi - lingualism is mandatory, so please share your unfortunate story with us in detail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ButterflyBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. And he probably hasn't immigrated to another country with another language
If he did, he probably would expect to have to learn their language. I would too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jerry611 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. You still didn't answer my question
Why is it so wrong to make people who immigrate here learn the english language?

And yes, we are being forced to learn spanish. In San Diego, some corporations won't hire you unless you are bilingual.
Its the new way for corporations to claim that Americans don't want the job so they will outsource it to immigrants for half the cost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sidpleasant Donating Member (376 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #20
25. "some corporations won't hire you unless you are bilingual"
So if you didn't want to work for one of those corporations you wouldn't be forced to learn a second language? That undercuts your "forced" argument rather dramatically, don't you think? They're not forcing you to do anything; they're looking for a specific set of skills that include bilingualism. Nothing wrong with that - a truck repair shop isn't "forcing" applicants to learn diesel engine repair when they list that skill in want - ads for mechanics. If you don't want to learn another language then don't work for the subset of all businesses in San Diego that require bilingualism.

As for the issue you're stuck on, you should do some research before regurgitating Minutemen talking points. The idea that there are large numbers of immigrants who can't speak any English is a right wing myth. According to the 2000 US census 65 percent of foreign - born US residents over the age of five who speak a language other than English at home speak English "very well" or "well." Another 35 percent had limited English proficiency. Further, there's plenty of academic research that demonstrates that English is overwhelmingly the language of the children and grandchildren of immigrants. The grandchildren of immigrants are thoroughly linguistically assimilated with only a minority being bilingual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eowyn_of_rohan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #25
29. Does not seem to be a myth
Since we spend multiple millions annually to provide services and assistance in Spanish to immigrants (largely undocumented) who do not speak English.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. Where did you get your figures?
Ballots are also printed in Vietnamese in Houston.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eowyn_of_rohan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #32
35. oops! stand corrected
make that billions
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. Okay--you pulled those figures out of your...
brain?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eowyn_of_rohan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. Do you really believe it is any less? If so, what are your sources?
It's hard to find current statistics on the total amount spent nationally on accomodating non-English speaking immigrants in every way, shape and form, but let's see...Using the public school bilingual education programs as a starting point (since you brought up free ESL classes earlier),
I see in your own state, as of Jan 2005, "(Dual Language) programs' annual costs on average were $290 per pupil in large programs; $406 per pupil in medium programs, and $879 per pupil in small programs" http://ldn.tamu.edu/Archives/CBAReport.pdf Do the math if you care to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #37
40. "ESL" classes are "English as a Second Language"....
Not the ones taught in school.

Texas has no Income Tax. Most programs are funded by Sales Tax--paid by everybody. And by Property Tax--also paid by everybody, although renters pay it indirectly. This is my state & I have no problem supporting these programs. If you disagree with your own state's policies, please contact your legislators.

Concerning our federal taxes, I am far more concerned about the obscene amounts now being spent to kill people.

The USA has taken in quite a few non-English speaking immigrants over the last couple of centuries. Somehow, the English language has survived.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eowyn_of_rohan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. yes, that is correct...so?
Cant you make the leap that the 2 types are similar?

Sheeesh, I do hate it when people don't stick to the topics that they bring up, then when they are challenged and don't have a good response, they change the subject, and/or insult the other person...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #20
27. Corporations are not the government. That is their market
decision.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #17
26. Straw man. Who said anything about making you learn theirs?
Most immigrants learn English and they are bilingual. Because they choose to, for their own benefit.

This is all tempest in a teapot and show how pathetic we've become.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
22. This Is A Constitutional Matter--Needs to Be an Amendment
and as such, it will never fly, either, but the futility and illegality of a measure has never bothered Congress before!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC