Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT: Cheney Pushed U.S. to Widen Eavesdropping

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 11:40 AM
Original message
NYT: Cheney Pushed U.S. to Widen Eavesdropping
By SCOTT SHANE
Published: May 14, 2006

WASHINGTON, May 12 — In the weeks after the Sept. 11 attacks, Vice President Dick Cheney and his top legal adviser argued that the National Security Agency should intercept purely domestic telephone calls and e-mail messages without warrants in the hunt for terrorists, according to two senior intelligence officials.
Skip to next paragraph
Threats & Responses
Go to Complete Coverage »

But N.S.A. lawyers, trained in the agency's strict rules against domestic spying and reluctant to approve any warrantless eavesdropping, insisted that it should be limited to communications into and out of the country, said the officials, who were granted anonymity to discuss the debate inside the Bush administration late in 2001.

. . .

As in other areas of intelligence collection, including interrogation methods for suspected terrorists, Mr. Cheney and Mr. Addington took an aggressive view of what was permissible under the Constitution, the two intelligence officials said.

If people suspected of links to Al Qaeda made calls inside the United States, the vice president and Mr. Addington thought eavesdropping without warrants "could be done and should be done," one of them said.

He added: "That's not what the N.S.A. lawyers think."

The other official said there was "a very healthy debate" over the issue. The vice president's staff was "pushing and pushing, and it was up to the N.S.A. lawyers to draw a line and say absolutely not."

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/14/washington/14nsa.html?_r=1&oref=slogin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. WOW! They might be in deep shit. (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catnhatnh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
2. Hmm,
Whats the cumulative jailtime for 200 million counts of conspiracy to violate civil rights???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. how's 200,000,000,000 years sound?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kierkegaard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. Sounds like somebody got off light!
Throw in a couple trillion hours of community service and you've got yourself a plea bargain!

*Tip: don't ever hire me as your lawyer...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
3. Cheney Pushed U.S. to Widen Eavesdropping - NYTimes
WASHINGTON, May 12 — In the weeks after the Sept. 11 attacks, Vice President Dick Cheney and his top legal adviser argued that the National Security Agency should intercept purely domestic telephone calls and e-mail messages without warrants in the hunt for terrorists, according to two senior intelligence officials.

But N.S.A. lawyers, trained in the agency's strict rules against domestic spying and reluctant to approve any warrantless eavesdropping, insisted that it should be limited to communications into and out of the country, said the officials, who were granted anonymity to discuss the debate inside the Bush administration late in 2001.

The N.S.A.'s position ultimately prevailed. Details have not emerged publicly of how the director of the agency at the time, Gen. Michael V. Hayden, designed the program, persuaded wary N.S.A. officers to accept it and sold the White House on its limits.

Whatever the internal deliberations, General Hayden was the program's overseer and has become its chief salesman. He is certain to face questions about his role when he appears at a Senate hearing next week on his nomination as director of the Central Intelligence Agency. Criticism of the surveillance program flared again this week with the disclosure that N.S.A. had collected the phone records of millions of Americans in an effort to track terror suspects.

more: http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/14/washington/14nsa.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Yeah, I 'm sure those two senior intelligence creeps are giving us the
straight story.

About that swampland...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #4
11. Actually, they're lawyers...they know only what they've been told to...
...say because it's extremely doubtful they would have been cleared to know the exact scope of the eavesdropping program.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Okay, why does this change my point? I don't care if they're janitors,
this is bullshit. We know it's bullshit. They HAVE to know it's bullshit. And anyone who would think that any 'info' coming from any man, woman, child, dog, cat, or lawyer connected with what passes for intelligence services in this country would be the dead on truth seriously needs to have their heads pried out of their posterior.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 11:50 AM
Original message
umm... Who leaked this information?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
29. NSA will know by Monday at the latest, who leaked. That's the point of
the tracing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
6. k and r ........... nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
7. They always shield Bush by blaming Cheney at last resort
This is like Stalin blaming Beria for the gulags, or Hitler blaming Himmler for the Holocaust. The fact is that Bush himself has said that he made the decision to have NSA eavesdrop. Bush called himself "The Decider"! What more evidence do we need when the man confesses in public and brags about it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
8. It ALWAYS comes back to Dick Cheney
He's always the one behind their evil schemes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
9. K&R!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
10. Cheney should be the first to be impeached
Followed by an ultimatum to the High Chancellor that he can pick his successor and resign, or face impeachment himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. umm.. seems these CIA officials want to put the onus on Cheney (fine with

me). I am sure they tire of being blamed for most 'bad' intel.


....Both officials said they were speaking publicly about the internal discussion because of the importance of the national security and civil liberty issues involved and because the interplay between Mr. Cheney's office and the intelligence agencies is usually hidden from public view. Both spoke favorably of General Hayden; one expressed no view on his nomination for the C.I.A. job, and the other was interviewed by The New York Times weeks before President Bush selected him.

Mr. Cheney's spokeswoman, Lee Anne McBride, declined to discuss the deliberations about the classified program.......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. I'm Certain Cheney Is the Prime Mover
They don't call him Darth Vader for nothing.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Miss Chybil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. You'e right, but the buck still stops with Bush. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. Sounds too favorable to Hayden. These folks want him confirmed, I
suspect so it's another "propaganda campaign" where we readers are left to parse out which side it's coming from.

Painting Hayden as a "good guy" who changed the program because he thought Darth Cheney was pressing to hard doesn't let Hayden off the hook in my opinion. We have no way to judge what might be the truth of it because it's all "TOP SECRET."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. Yes the tone of the article is that Hayden is the good guy
A good guy fighting the good fight against that low-polling nasty Cheney.

What I believe is Cheney may have pushed and Hayden, being the team player he is, said okay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
15. Whoa, I wonder if this is what Tice is bringing to Congress-
snip>
Despite the decision to target only international calls and e-mail messages, some domestic traffic was picked up inadvertently because of difficulties posed by cell phone and e-mail technology in determining whether a user is on American soil, as The Times reported last year.

And one government official, who had access to intelligence from the intercepts and was granted anonymity because of the classified nature of the program, believes that some of the purely domestic eavesdropping in the program's early phase was intentional. No other officials have made that claim.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Loge23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
17. Both should be arrested
The idiot president and his mentor, the arrogant VP, should be arrested and imprisoned for treason.
They are enemies of our freedom and democracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
19. Is that surcharge of $1.50 on my phone bill there to cover
their spying on us?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
20. well if he gets arrested for crimes then
it sure will make more people want chimpeachment. The first fear raised by everyone is that Heartless would then be president. I would love to see that evil bastard in prison.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
23. Impeach and Indict
then tried for War crimes and maybe a Class Action Lawsuit!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
24. Makes you feel like adding an addendum to your email
stating.

"Warning this email could be intercepted and read at will by the NSA. It is not private. Please keep that in mind when replying."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oak2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Could be?
Given who we here are, that's more likely a "probably"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. Actually, if I heard the news correctly when I walked through the room
yesterday, their plan is to "capture" ALL phone calls and email. Don't remember what channel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. I don't think "could be" even holds anymore. I think it's more like
"already has been".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ckramer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
28. That's why the gold price is shooting to the roof!
Total corruption.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-14-06 02:57 AM
Response to Original message
30. Cheney Pushed U.S. to Widen Eavesdropping
WASHINGTON, May 13 —

In the weeks after the Sept. 11 attacks, Vice President Dick Cheney and his top legal adviser argued that the National Security Agency should intercept purely domestic telephone calls and e-mail messages without warrants in the hunt for terrorists, according to two senior intelligence officials.

But N.S.A. lawyers, trained in the agency's strict rules against domestic spying and reluctant to approve any eavesdropping without warrants, insisted that it should be limited to communications into and out of the country, said the officials, who were granted anonymity to discuss the debate inside the Bush administration late in 2001.

The N.S.A.'s position ultimately prevailed. But just how Gen. Michael V. Hayden, the director of the agency at the time, designed the program, persuaded wary N.S.A. officers to accept it and sold the White House on its limits is not yet clear.

As the program's overseer and chief salesman, General Hayden is certain to face questions about his role when he appears at a Senate hearing next week on his nomination as director of the Central Intelligence Agency. Criticism of the surveillance program, which some lawmakers say is illegal, flared again this week with the disclosure that the N.S.A. had collected the phone records of millions of Americans in an effort to track terrorism suspects.

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/14/washington/14nsa.html?hp&ex=1147579200&en=9a442ce4901ab0c7&ei=5094&partner=homepage


Looks like we have a few more logs to throw on the fire.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-14-06 02:57 AM
Response to Reply #30
31. I sooo want to see Dick Cheney in an orange jumpsuit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greeby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-14-06 02:57 AM
Response to Reply #30
32. Figures. Did anyone really think this was Shrub's idea
He's so useless that if he held a gun to your head while you were sleeping and pulled the trigger, he'd still miss :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emal2me Donating Member (16 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-14-06 02:57 AM
Response to Reply #32
37. That reminds me
After Chaney shot that lawyer down in Texas Jay Leno said: "Bush said he stands behind the vice president - way the hell behind!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oldtime dfl_er Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-14-06 02:57 AM
Response to Reply #30
33. Gee, I'm so surprised
Dick Cheney's office is the black hole of illegality (I know, black holes hold everything in -- but I couldn't think of a better metaphor).


http://www.cafepress.com/scarebaby/714748
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DELUSIONAL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-14-06 02:57 AM
Response to Reply #30
34. Is foot in the grave Cheney going to be the fall guy??
Not that I don't think he probably is guilty of all sorts of nasty things -- and is probably the real Prez. But is he also disposable??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-14-06 02:57 AM
Response to Reply #34
35. Bush, Cheney and Rummie
are the core. I think if one falls, then other will fall soon after.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoodleyAppendage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-14-06 02:57 AM
Response to Reply #30
36. Dick Cheney is EVIL INCARNATE. I hope the fires of Hell burn him forever.
Never in my 39 years of existence have I met a politican of such evil and malace for anything smacking of a Constitutional democracy. Serial killers and Cheney are no different. Serial killers murder on a small scale, while Cheney and his policies yield mass murder of thousands. I'm ashamed to even share the same country of origin as his puss-filled, black hearted body.

J
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Heidi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-14-06 02:57 AM
Response to Reply #30
38. Locking at OP's request.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-14-06 02:57 AM
Response to Reply #30
39. so now hayden is a hero??
"The N.S.A.'s position ultimately prevailed. But just how Gen. Michael V. Hayden, the director of the agency at the time, designed the program, persuaded wary N.S.A. officers to accept it and sold the White House on its limits is not yet clear."

spare me.

oh, liberal media.....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 06:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC