Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reuters: Bush Defends Scope of Domestic Spying

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 11:09 AM
Original message
Reuters: Bush Defends Scope of Domestic Spying

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060513/ap_on_go_pr_wh/bush;_ylt=ApOca7i3CDfcOSEktrnPQEus0NUE;_ylu=X3oDMTA2Z2szazkxBHNlYwN0bQ--

Bush Defends Scope of Domestic Spying

By DEB RIECHMANN, Associated Press Writer 2 hours, 1 minute ago

WASHINGTON -
President Bush defended the scope of the government's domestic surveillance programs that have riled privacy advocates and threatened to impede the Senate confirmation of Bush's new pick to lead the CIA.


"The privacy of all Americans is fiercely protected in all our activities," Bush said Saturday in his weekly radio address. "The government does not listen to domestic phone calls without court approval. We are not trolling through the personal lives of millions of innocent Americans."
.........

Without specifically confirming the database effort, Bush defended the intelligence activities he has authorized, saying they are focused on al-Qaida terrorists and their affiliates. He reiterated that they are lawful and that appropriate members of Congress, both Republican and Democrat, have been briefed on the surveillance activities.

"Americans expect their government to do everything in its power under our laws and Constitution to protect them and their civil liberties," Bush said. "That is exactly what we are doing. And so far, we have been successful in preventing another attack on our soil."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PSPS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
1. Don't make me laugh
> "And so far, we have been successful in preventing another attack on our soil."

Hardly "preventing." You just haven't ordered one up yet. Got to wait until, say, October for it to have the "desired effect."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
electropop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
2. So far Bush has failed to prevent the biggest attack in US history.
Despite numerous explicit warnings, thousands of hours of tapped phone calls, Moussauoui in custody, etc, Bush ignored the advance warning of 9/11 and let it happen. He's been tapping our phones since well before 9/11, so the claim that this has something to do with preventing terra is silly on its face.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I'm waiting for that particular fact to register on a majority of...
...Americans. Once they realize for a fact that the NeoCons knew the 911 attacks were coming and did nothing to stop them, or worse yet, allowed them to happen, impeachment of His Chimpness will be back "on the table".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoodleyAppendage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
4. FUCK YOU...YOU FASCIST SIMPLETON DICTATOR.
Your day of reckoning is at hand. Soon America will be restored as you are led away from the WH in handcuffs and leg chains. I hope your "faith" is shaken as you are raped repeatedly in jail, you fucking threat to democracy.

Sorry...I just had to let that out.

J
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuffleClaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
5. "known affiliates"
hmmmmmmmm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
6. "we have been successful in preventing another attack"= "we failed to
protect the US from the first attack even though we were warned again and again and again and again..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ms. Clio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
7. Since the spying started BEFORE 9/11
you clearly failed to prevent the first attack at all, Chimpy.






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 07:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC