Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Security Issue Kills Domestic Spying Probe

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 06:25 PM
Original message
Security Issue Kills Domestic Spying Probe
The government has abruptly ended an inquiry into the warrantless eavesdropping program because the National Security Agency refused to grant Justice Department lawyers the necessary security clearance to probe the matter.
The inquiry headed by the Justice Department's Office of Professional Responsibility, or OPR, sent a fax to Rep. Maurice Hinchey, D-N.Y., on Wednesday saying they were closing their inquiry because without clearance their lawyers cannot examine Justice lawyers' role in the program.

"We have been unable to make any meaningful progress in our investigation because OPR has been denied security clearances for access to information about the NSA program," OPR counsel H. Marshall Jarrett wrote to Hinchey. Hinchey's office shared the letter with The Associated Press.

Jarrett wrote that beginning in January 2006, his office has made a series of requests for the necessary clearances. Those requests were denied Tuesday. "Without these clearances, we cannot investigate this matter and therefore have closed our investigation," wrote Jarrett. Hinchey is one of many House Democrats who have been highly critical of the domestic eavesdropping program first revealed in December.

In February, the OPR announced it would examine the conduct of their own agency's lawyers in the program, though they were not authorized to investigate NSA activities. Bush's decision to authorize the largest U.S. spy agency to monitor people inside the United States, without warrants, generated a host of questions about the program's legal justification. The administration has vehemently defended the eavesdropping, saying the NSA's activities were narrowly targeted to intercept international calls and e-mails of Americans and others inside the U.S. with suspected ties to the al-Qaida terror network.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060510/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/domestic_spying
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. More obstruction....move along folks nothing to see here..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. and many in this rubber stamp congress will nod and walk on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. Bush is the Decider and so breaking the law is okay if he says it is.
Bush's decision to authorize the largest U.S. spy agency to monitor people inside the United States, without warrants, generated a host of questions about the program's legal justification.

The administration has vehemently defended the eavesdropping, saying the NSA's activities were narrowly targeted to intercept international calls and e-mails of Americans and others inside the U.S. with suspected ties to the al-Qaida terror network.


We live in LaLaLand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigluckyfeet Donating Member (559 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
4. If This is true
Why are my e-mails being sent to the NSA by AT&T.



"The administration has vehemently defended the eavesdropping, saying the NSA's activities were narrowly targeted to intercept international calls and e-mails of Americans and others inside the U.S. with suspected ties to the al-Qaida terror network."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. I asked that question a few weeks ago.
It is only a matter of time before the gummit allows AT&T to reemerge and do their bidding in the name of 'national security'. AT&T has been spying on us for 20 years, why would they quit with corporations ruling over us?

On the plus side - I sure do like paying my bill online. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
5. k/r
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Doctor. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
6. WAITJUSTA GOD-DERNED COTTON PICKIN' MINUTETHERE!!!
No... uhn-uh...

This is a BLATANT conflict of interest, who do we light a fire under to file suit?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
farmbo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 06:44 AM
Response to Reply #6
44. Sooo...we can't probe government secrets because of..government secrets.
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mom cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
7. How convenient!
Well, that settled it then, huh.:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuffleClaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
8. a blatant obstruction of justice
and pretty much what we've come to expect from this administration. whatever happened to the right wing mantra of, 'if you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to worry about' ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
9. What a surprise.
Edited on Wed May-10-06 08:12 PM by acmavm
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
10. Another BushCo self-investigation. Independent authorities w/ subpoenas
.. might get further ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
12. At least when the Grope investigated himself
he used both hands.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 01:58 AM
Response to Original message
13. Justice Department Abruptly Ends Domestic Spying Probe
http://aolsvc.news.aol.com/news/article.adp?id=20060510195009990009

"WASHINGTON (May 10) - The government has abruptly ended an inquiry into the warrantless eavesdropping program because the National Security Agency refused to grant Justice Department lawyers the necessary security clearance to probe the matter.

The Justice Department's Office of Professional Responsibility, or OPR, sent a fax to Rep. Maurice Hinchey, D-N.Y., on Wednesday saying they were closing their inquiry because without clearance their lawyers cannot examine Justice lawyers' role in the program.

SNIP

"We have been unable to make any meaningful progress in our investigation because OPR has been denied security clearances for access to information about the NSA program," OPR counsel H. Marshall Jarrett wrote to Hinchey. . . .

Hinchey is one of many House Democrats who have been highly critical of the domestic eavesdropping program first revealed in December. . . .
'This administration thinks they can just violate any law they want, and they've created a culture of fear to try to get away with that. It's up to us to stand up to them,' said Hinchey."

SNIP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MnFats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 01:59 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. sumbitch. not surprising, though. this means that..
..
Gen Hayden must be grilled harder than ever for answers about this vile unconstitutional spying on Americans...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 01:59 AM
Response to Reply #14
24. Nope. Senate Dems Are Afraid to Bring It Up. Repubs Would Spin It…
…on TV to make us look weak on security and hurt us in the elections.

Seems to me that by that argument we can't say anything about anything,
because the Repubs/media always twist everything we say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kenergy Donating Member (834 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 01:59 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. This administration has declared that it is no longer
accountable to anyone. I don't know why everyone is afraid to admit what is going on
in this country...it's called FASCISM.
It isn't incompetence, it isn't stupidity, it's FASCISM.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShockediSay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 01:59 AM
Response to Reply #15
19. repeat: It isn't incompetence, it isn't stupidity, it's FASCISM.
all of the above
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 01:59 AM
Response to Reply #15
20. I think a lot of us here are ready to call it that. I am.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #15
53. You're absolutely correct. The coup is over we now have a
fascist dictator and the folks just can't get use to it.

The problem now is dethroning the bastard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 01:59 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. Ya don't say...
Why am I not surprised?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 01:59 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. Bush has looked deep into the eyes of the enemy....
and it is the American people. I think we all know what they are hiding....it's all about collecting info on their political enemies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 01:59 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. I am sure you are right and this
You see this odd group in the WH has got rid of Goss. I can not get over the thought of thinking that they are starting to eat their own. I really do not know how to put it but it seems to always turn to this type stuff. It is like when one church gets all the power in a country it starts eating away at the edge of its own church people to make the church more pure so to speak. Governments that do a take over seem to do the same thing. We seem to be seeing it all over the Middle East right now also. It is like holding on to something you believe in, right or wrong, with almost a death like belief, even if you kill off half the people who put you their in the first place. Course it has taken many countries down or groups over the edge. Just a thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 01:59 AM
Response to Reply #18
22. Let's hope you're right and the whole administration is about to spin
out of control.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 01:59 AM
Response to Reply #22
26. Well if you look at our history I think we have been here before.
I really do not want to read American history right now but if we have some one who is really into it on this site I bet they could put us into the right place on it. I really think I can recall it going on when we get this type leadership in groups and government just in what I recall. I once did a paper on Cromwell and it happened there. It is I think a common type thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azurnoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 01:59 AM
Response to Reply #13
21. Not to be paraniod
but doesn't seem like *co is putting a lot of work in to something that supposed to end in approx, 18 months?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 01:59 AM
Response to Reply #21
23. Just today they floated the trial balloon of a Jeb presidency.
Not to be too paranoid or anything. Then, when he's done, there will be one of the nephews. . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 01:59 AM
Response to Reply #21
25. They're Not Leaving
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BikeWriter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 02:03 AM
Response to Original message
27. The Schutzstaffel cannot be investigated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 05:39 AM
Response to Original message
28. Security issue kills domestic spying inquiry(DOJ Is Denied Clearances)
NSA won’t grant Justice Department lawyers required security clearance

WASHINGTON - The government has abruptly ended an inquiry into the warrantless eavesdropping program because the National Security Agency refused to grant Justice Department lawyers the necessary security clearance to probe the matter.

The inquiry headed by the Justice Department’s Office of Professional Responsibility, or OPR, sent a fax to Rep. Maurice Hinchey, D-N.Y., on Wednesday saying they were closing their inquiry because without clearance their lawyers cannot examine Justice lawyers’ role in the program.

“We have been unable to make any meaningful progress in our investigation because OPR has been denied security clearances for access to information about the NSA program,” OPR counsel H. Marshall Jarrett wrote to Hinchey. Hinchey’s office shared the letter with The Associated Press.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12727867/from/RSS/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kutjara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 05:39 AM
Response to Reply #28
29. Rearrange the following to form a complete sentence:
complete a shit what of crock.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 05:39 AM
Response to Reply #28
30. Bush denied wiretapping ordinary Americans and now
he has been found lying...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 05:39 AM
Response to Reply #28
31. No wonder clearance wasn't allowed if they have this huge
database of American telephone calls, there is no where to hide it if the DOJ came calling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dweller Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 05:39 AM
Response to Reply #28
32. but USAToday has knowledge of wiretaps/database?
down IS up.

dp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 05:39 AM
Response to Reply #28
33. This is nothing more than stonewalling
Edited on Wed May-10-06 11:43 PM by IndianaGreen
The NSA is breaking the law, they know it, and they don't want anyone to call them on it, so they use the subterfuge of security clearances to derail a bona fide investigation.

And they have the audacity of calling themselves patriots when they are nothing more than common criminals!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 05:39 AM
Response to Reply #33
36. Stonewalling implies one can get past the blockage.
The DOJ has no recourse and has dropped the investigation.

People above the law: George W. Bush, Dick Cheney and now the NSA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 05:39 AM
Response to Reply #28
34. Look at the last paragraph
The administration has vehemently defended the eavesdropping, saying the NSA’s activities were narrowly targeted to intercept international calls and e-mails of Americans and others inside the U.S. with suspected ties to the al-Qaida terrorist network.


Now, go read the breaking news from USAToday. They lied and there is absolutely no skirting it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 05:39 AM
Response to Reply #34
35. Bingo
thats the story!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsMagnificent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #34
47. Link to the USA Today story pls?
I've never gone there -- anything I've read in the past appeared to be pure pablum... are they turning around & getting their journalistic act together?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #47
49. LBN link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsMagnificent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #49
50. Thank you!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noel adamson Donating Member (353 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 05:39 AM
Response to Reply #28
37. Consider the possibility that they will just declare a dictatorship...
...and drop the burdensome pretense of democracy. They have all but done that already, they are acting like there will not be another election and who's to stop them???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InkAddict Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 05:39 AM
Response to Reply #28
38. I'm so disgusted with this filthy group of liars...
What's the problemo - Iranian partner of small little piss ant company that probably shouldn't have, but did, win big US Gov financial project that required clearances gets to walk around their work sites sans clearance...then go visit relatives in the ME for weddings and other little business(?) trips...oops, I think I may have typed that perhaps too vaguely. What gives with this incompetent bunch of freaks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsMagnificent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 05:39 AM
Response to Reply #28
39. This somehow reminds me of
Nixon's firing of Archibald Cox

--and you know where that led to...

If the Senators and Congresspeople do not do anything to reverse this they ALL deserve not only to be out of a job but also to be prosecuted for violating their oaths, not to mention betraying the People -- their constituents and their employers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 05:39 AM
Response to Reply #28
40. sigh. . if we only had a body of lawmakers, you know...
a group of people elected to do the people's work.

(nom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 05:39 AM
Response to Reply #28
41. (rate this MSNBC story up). . . . . . n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Speaker Donating Member (225 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 05:39 AM
Response to Reply #28
42. Only the Gestapo...
is qualified to investigate the Gestapo.

So transparent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wicket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 06:10 AM
Response to Original message
43. kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 06:50 AM
Response to Original message
45. Didn't Hayden tell Congessional leaders that he would cooperate....
...on matters concerning domestic spying?

Is this what he meant by "cooperationn"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
46. Ha! It's been subject to "extensive oversight" WITHIN the exec branch???
Edited on Thu May-11-06 08:52 AM by Rose Siding
Justice Department spokesman Brian Roehrkasse said the terrorist surveillance program "has been subject to extensive oversight both in the executive branch and in Congress from the time of its inception."

Self-examination. How reassuring (we KNOW their lying about congres. oversight- ask any dem)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
48. what I want to know
is how long the majority of the American people going to put up with this shite? We've had Cheney's "secret" energy meetings, the 9/11 bogus commission where Cheney and Bush, both, did not have to testify under oath--as a matter fact, it seems these miscreants never have to testify under oath. So, if they lie, they can say they didn't do it under oath, so no foul. Pre-emptive war based on absolute falsehoods and the outing of not only Plame, but a network overseeing WMDs. Then, there's the sweet deal contracts to war profiteers like Halliburton, who have fed our soldiers sub-standard food and tainted water while their stocks have skyrocketed. There's the complicity of MSM who "catapult" the BS; and the inauditable voting machines that we, the taxpayers, have paid for. No fly lists that include some Democrats, Green Party Members, nuns and priests, Quaker members and other pro-peace groups. Domestic spying is the tip of the quickly melting iceberg. When is it enough?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbtries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
51. that first sentence,
"The government has abruptly ended an inquiry into the warrantless eavesdropping program because the National Security Agency refused to grant Justice Department lawyers the necessary security clearance to probe the matter."

catch 22. gets ya every time. i can't believe our country is lunatic, but then i guess the lunacy has gone on before. before i was born, before i could talk, before i gave a good goddam...but i am 50 years old now, and i swear i never thought i'd be living to see the dismantling of my country by the white house.

sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
52. not delayed for clearance -- abruptly ENDED -- but Tony Snow is cleared
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 12:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC