Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

New Scrutiny for Law on Detaining Witnesses

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-22-06 09:53 AM
Original message
New Scrutiny for Law on Detaining Witnesses
A 22-year-old federal law that allows people to be held without charges if they have information about others' crimes is coming under fresh scrutiny in the courts, in Congress and within the Justice Department after reports that it has been abused in terrorism investigations.

The law allows so-called material witnesses to be held long enough to secure their testimony if there is reason to think they will flee. But lawyers for people detained as material witnesses say the law has been used to hold people who the government fears will commit terrorist acts in the future but whom it lacks probable cause to charge with a crime.

Concerns about how the law has been used have prompted calls from across the political spectrum for a reassessment. That debate has also ignited a broader one: whether the United States should join the several Western nations that have straightforward preventive detention laws.
.....
A department spokesman did not respond to requests for more current numbers. The department has for three years refused to give Congress fresher data on material witness detentions in terrorism investigations.

"They claim that they can't even tell us how many people they have detained" because of court sealing orders and grand jury secrecy rules, said Julie Katzman, a lawyer on Senator Leahy's staff.

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/03/22/politics/22witness.html?ex=1300683600&en=1dd52b580726111e&ei=5090&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-22-06 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. Every law like this ends up being abused
It's just not possible to craft a law like this that doesn't lend itself to abuse. It starts off with the highest motives: We want to protect the most vulnerable witnesses to the most heinous crimes. Then it starts creeping, and 20 years later, there is no public record, no public access, no public review of who's being detained or for how long, and another American gulag is born.

But it's for our own protection.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakeme2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-22-06 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
2. My standard reply on this is "President Hillary will love it "
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-22-06 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
3. BushCo Can Pervert ANYTHING
Look at the job they did on Jesus, the 10 Commandments, and the Constitution!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-22-06 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
4. You mean there was something on the DOJ's wishlist that wasn't
granted when they passed the new and improved Patriot Act???? Well, they will pick it up next time. Last paragraph of the article:

snip>

"The most confident prediction you can make," Professor Cole said, "is that after the next attack, a preventive detention statute will be proposed."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC