Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. Seeks Reversal of Moussaoui Ruling

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
ShockediSay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 12:17 AM
Original message
U.S. Seeks Reversal of Moussaoui Ruling
http://www.abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory?id=1730063


By MATTHEW BARAKAT and MICHAEL J. SNIFFEN

ALEXANDRIA, Va. Mar 15, 2006 (AP)— Prosecutors asked a judge Wednesday to reconsider her decision to toss out half of the government's case against confessed terrorist Zacarias Moussaoui. They acknowledged that altering the judge's ruling is their only hope of salvaging the death-penalty case.

In a motion filed with U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkeman, prosecutors said the aviation security evidence she barred because a government lawyer coached the witnesses "goes to the very core of our theory of the case."


+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Once again, our government wants to ignore judicial rule of law, so they can go ahead and kill the ONE guy they caught, after the fact of 9/11. And how do they do this? Just like warrantless wiretaps - go back after the fact and say it's OK you broke the law - you're our protectors (they are anything but).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 12:24 AM
Response to Original message
1. The judiciary is the last little string with which we hold on
to democracy. And Brinkeman will probably get death threats because of this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TaleWgnDg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 01:18 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Why?
Why should this federal trial court judge receive death threats as you allege? Are you aware that the judge's ruling/order is FAVORABLE to the criminal defendant, Moussaoui?

Her ruling/order, which the prosecution is requesting to be reversed, throws out much of the prosecution's sentencing case against Moussaoui. Read more about it here at http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/paperchase/2006/03/moussaoui-prosecutors-ask-judge-to.php Check out the hyperlinks too.

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 01:31 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Yes, I'm aware
She'll probably get death threats like O'Connor and Ginsburg did when they made "liberal" decisions--from conservative wingnuts who are easily confused between the principles of democracy and those of autocracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 05:10 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. The death threats to the judge would be coming not from those
supporting the defendant, but from those who want him to receive the death penalty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TaleWgnDg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 01:08 AM
Response to Original message
2. She will refuse -- the federal district court trial judge will refuse --
then the prosecution will most probably appeal to the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals which is our nation's most conservative federal appellate court! BTW, I cannot fathom the outrageous arrogance of these federal prosecutors who COACHED witnesses?! And these are the witnesses that are at the essence of the Moussaoui case! How STUPID can the prosecution get? How the hell can a trial judge allow testimony from witnesses who were "coached" in a death penalty case? Gee, do you think that the U.S. constitution allows witnesses to be "coached" by the prosecution, particularly when the death penalty is at issue?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 01:35 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. "Coaching" is a fine line
Certainly the prosecution had interviewed the witnesses, and just asking witnesses certain questions can be considered coaching.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TaleWgnDg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 01:57 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. That may be true as to a broad definition of witness "coaching"
.

That may be true as to a broad definition of witness "coaching" . . . however, here, in the case at issue, Moussaoui, it seems to be more narrowly defined, as well as a potential criminal violation, and in defiance of a court order. See, e.g., JURIST NEWS report here and the Washington Post report here.

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 07:14 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. They need to give the lawyer...
... who compromised this case the "career death" penalty, i.e. disbarment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TaleWgnDg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 04:36 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. For more on this . . .
.

TSA lawyer in Moussaoui case placed on leave for misconduct


JURIST NEWS, by Joshua Pantesco, Thursday, March 16, 2006, at 4:07 PM ET

(JURIST) Carla Martin, the Transportation Security Administration lawyer who improperly coached witnesses against defendant Zacarias Moussaoui in his September 11 sentencing trial, was placed on paid administrative leave Thursday. According to trial judge Leonie Brinkema, Martin egregiously violated federal rules when she sent witnesses e-mails about their upcoming testimony that disclosed parts of the government's case contrary to a sequestration order , coached them on how to react to defense cross-examination, and lied to defense lawyers to interfere with interviewing potential witnesses. Martin's ethical violations could lead to civil or criminal contempt charges, accompanied by penalties which could include fines, disbarment, or even imprisonment.

As for Moussaoui, who pleaded guilty to conspiracy charges that he was involved in other al Qaeda plans to commit terrorist acts with hijacked planes, Martin's misconduct means that the prosecution will have to seek the death penalty against him without the aid of aviation-related evidence, which Brinkema has prohibited the government from presenting . One witness, however, has claimed she was not tainted by Martin's emails , and the prosecution has requested that Brinkema reconsider her ruling arguing it is "unprecedented and overbroad." AP has more.

. . . more at . . . http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/paperchase/2006/03/tsa-lawyer-in-moussaoui-case-placed-on.php

(removed all hyperlinks to source materials; go to Jurist url to access hyperlinks -- TaleWgnDg)



.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 05:06 AM
Response to Original message
7. Hello, ABC, the judge's name is Brinkema, not Brinkeman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 07:03 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. The Bush Regime loves the Death Penalty.
They will break any Law to kill people.

It isn't justice unless a person is executed in their view.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 07:38 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Plus they want to shut this guy up for good..
don't want him to spill the beans on what really happened before 9/11.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC