Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ohio House OKs ban on pregnancy disputes (wrongful-birth suits)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
mtnester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 07:31 AM
Original message
Ohio House OKs ban on pregnancy disputes (wrongful-birth suits)
<snip>
Ten days after the Ohio Supreme Court ruled that parents of children with birth defects can sue doctors for failing to identify the abnormalities during pregnancy, the House approved a bill that would ban such lawsuits. The bill now goes to Gov. Bob Taft, who is expected to sign it.

The premise of wrongful-birth lawsuits is that parents would have terminated the pregnancies had they been given accurate information about the health of the fetus. The Supreme Court said in a 4-3 decision that parents can sue on such grounds but can collect only the costs of the pregnancy and birth, not the price tag of raising a disabled child.

<snip>
"The premise of this type of lawsuit is that death is preferable to life with a disability. That is unconscionable to me," said Rep. Jim Aslanides, a Coshocton Republican

Parents still could sue if a doctor knowingly withholds infor- mation about the health of a fetus. Still, opponents have argued that the bill would let doctors off the hook for making mistakes and deny parents the right to make a legal choice about their pregnancy.


http://www.dispatch.com/news-story.php?story=dispatch/2006/03/15/20060315-A1-03.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 07:36 AM
Response to Original message
1. Legislators obviously see this a 'frivolous" law suits. The Two America's
again at play--as those with insurance will be able to have tests done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 07:51 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Without Knowing All The Details ...
Diagnostic medicine is still an imperfect science. We don't know if this was a case of sheer incompetance, we don't know if this was a case of a child being so malformed it couldn't make it past the first year, or just wasn't "perfect" enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 07:41 AM
Response to Original message
2. Well don't you know that is why medical costs are so high?
It's because of all those law suits from ungrateful patients. You don't need accurate medical information or even competent doctors. That's reserved for the upper class elite. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 07:45 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. My own issues with this are this
How to prove a doctor wrongly interpreted tests (and if so, he/she is protected under this law) or that the doctor wrongly interpreted the tests ON PURPOSE because he/she knew the decision would have been made to terminate the pregnancy, and that violated his/her religious beliefs (ALSO now protected cause how do you PROVE this)

Another decision that only a woman should make about her body being not only tampered with by others, but protects those with LAW on those who could possibly deliberately withheld this info as described above.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleedingheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 08:04 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. there are rather solid ways to determine whether the MD is at fault
typically the methods of proof are the lack of initiative on the MD's end.

1. Some women were not offered the Maternal Fetal Alpha Protein test, an indicator or diseases like spina bifida and downs. That test alone can help determine what is wrong.
2. Accurate measurment of fetal growth, sonogram, fundal measurements...etc
3. bleeding during pregnancy with no follow up testing to determine why.


The Physician's record will prove what actions he/she took.

Now there are cases that just allude the doctors but in those cases the evidence of their due diligence will back them up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. I am absolutely sure that is true..however, if you cannot SUE over it
Edited on Wed Mar-15-06 09:09 AM by mtnester
how would you be able to determine that your tests were:

1. Performed
2. Interpreted correctly/competently? (or even ATTEMPTED to)

Scares me kiddo! This is NOT about lawsuits..it is about allowing doctors to protect their religious ideology at the expense of women.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 08:01 AM
Response to Original message
5. Some doctors are deliberately withholding information
There are cases of doctors telling their obstetric patients that "everything is fine" when they know that the test results indicate otherwise. By withholding the information or flat-out lying about the results, they intend to prevent the woman from choosing to abort.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 08:32 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. And are now LEGALLY protected if they choose this route n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
8. It's safer to have a baby in a couple dozen of other
Edited on Wed Mar-15-06 08:51 AM by Ilsa
countries compared to the US. Hey, join the army and have your baby in Germany! :sarcasm:

God Almighty, what an immoral law. Before long they won't even bother offering the tests for determination of a problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Exactly! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 12:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC