Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Even as U.S. Invaded, Hussein Saw Iraqi Unrest as Top Threat

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
ECH1969 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-11-06 07:36 PM
Original message
Even as U.S. Invaded, Hussein Saw Iraqi Unrest as Top Threat
As American warplanes streaked overhead two weeks after the invasion began, Lt. Gen. Raad Majid al-Hamdani drove to Baghdad for a crucial meeting with Iraqi leaders. He pleaded for reinforcements to stiffen the capital's defenses and permission to blow up the Euphrates River bridge south of the city to block the American advance.

But Saddam Hussein and his small circle of aides had their own ideas of how to fight the war. Convinced that the main danger to his government came from within, Mr. Hussein had sought to keep Iraq's bridges intact so he could rush troops south if the Shiites got out of line.

Ever vigilant about coups and fearful of revolt, Mr. Hussein was deeply distrustful of his own commanders and soldiers, the documents show. He made crucial decisions himself, relied on his sons for military counsel and imposed security measures that had the effect of hobbling his forces. He did this in several ways:

The Iraqi dictator was so secretive and kept information so compartmentalized that his top military leaders were stunned when he told them three months before the war that he had no weapons of mass destruction, and they were demoralized because they had counted on hidden stocks of poison gas or germ weapons for the nation's defense.

http://nytimes.com/2006/03/12/international/middleeast/12saddam.html?ei=5094&en=92e0be161a491636&hp=&ex=1142139600&partner=homepage&pagewanted=print
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
pretzel4gore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-11-06 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. saddam probably thought he was safe being a cia asset
like noriega, he trusted punks...,.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-11-06 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-11-06 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. More likely, Saddam decided guerrilla war was the best option
And that defending Baghdad with large conventional forces would get the city destroyed and most of his troops killed.

"...he told them three months before the war that he had no weapons of mass destruction..."

Bush had to know this too, given the reach of U.S. intelligence. More indirect evidence of Bush's lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaysunb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-11-06 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I'm not so sure about this.
Edited on Sat Mar-11-06 08:57 PM by jaysunb
"...he told them three months before the war that he had no weapons of mass destruction..."


I can't help but wonder if this may have been " inserted " to reinforce the " everybody thought he had them" lie.

Boy....this tinfoil hat's getting lots of work these days. :evilgrin:

on edit
BTW, I think your theory is dead on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-11-06 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
5. This sure sounds like bullshit.
And you have to wonder why all of a sudden we have to be told about the inner doings of Saddam's mind now? Has he got a movie out and he's doing interviews?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-11-06 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. makes you wonder how long....
Edited on Sat Mar-11-06 10:50 PM by stillcool47
before the NYTimes has to offer up another mea culpa, for reporting bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
physioex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-11-06 11:39 PM
Response to Original message
7. This is Dudu.....
Everyone including Shrubco knew he had no WMD.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 02:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC