Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Protesters interrupt Clinton visit ("When are our troops coming home...")

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-10-06 04:02 PM
Original message
Protesters interrupt Clinton visit ("When are our troops coming home...")

http://www.newsday.com/news/local/wire/newyork/ny-bc-ny--clinton-war0310mar10,0,7647248.story?coll=ny-region-apnewyork

Protesters interrupt Clinton visit

ALBANY, N.Y. (AP) _ An appearance by Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton at a jobs conference in Albany was briefly disrupted Friday by one of her two anti-war opponents for the Democratic Senate nomination.

As more than 200 Albany-area business executives listened to a panel discussion at the State University at Albany, Steve Greenfield rose from the audience and shouted "When are our troops coming home from Iraq?"

The former first lady sitting with the panel said, "We'll discuss it later. We're going to move on."

...

Outside the room, Greenfield complained about the "cozy relationship between the government and the private war-profiteering sector."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hiley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-10-06 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. discuss it later
how many more die while we wait for later?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinniped Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-10-06 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. When you're a war monger, expect to be asked war related questions.
Whether one gets an answer is another story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-10-06 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. Hillary Clinton was anti-war during VietNam -68 - election
I have gone from a Barry Goldwater Republican to a New Democrat, but I think my underlying values have remained pretty constant; individual responsibility and community. I do not see those as being mutually inconsistent.

FROM A REVIEW OF HER BOOK:

After three years in Park Ridge’s "Maine Township East High," Hillary was redistricted into newly-built Maine South High, for her 1964-65 senior year. During that year her combination of socially-conscious youth activities at First United Methodist Church, earning A’s in a high quality academic program, and the plethora of extra-curricular activities reported here must have produced a weekly schedule as tight as a political campaigner’s. But in the fall of 1964 she also found time to go door-to-door for Barry Goldwater—the last Republican Presidential contender she was to support (in 1968 she followed first Eugene McCarthy and then Hubert Humphrey).


FROM AN INTERVIEW ON TODAY

“You graduated from Wellesley in 1969. You were the first student commencement speaker.”

FROM ANOTHER BOOK REVIEW

At Wellesley, Hillary Clinton was president of the Young Republicans. It was Vietnam that fomented the first challenge to her politics, and the GOP's rightward drift that helped push her into the Democratic Party. "I didn't leave the Republican Party as much as it left me."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jamesinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 05:25 AM
Response to Reply #12
28. I knew it, at heart she is a Repug
"I didn't leave the Republican Party as much as it left me."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-10-06 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. He won't be the last to complain about people making money off of war.
"A few profit – and the many pay. But there is a way to stop it. You can't end it by disarmament conferences. You can't eliminate it by peace parleys at Geneva. Well-meaning but impractical groups can't wipe it out by resolutions. It can be smashed effectively only by taking the profit out of war."

-- Gen. Smedley Butler, War Is A Racket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Julius Civitatus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-10-06 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. Why are they not so pushy with Republicans???
Edited on Fri Mar-10-06 04:26 PM by Julius Civitatus
OK, this is starting to piss me off.

Twice this week we had left-of-center protesters heckling speeches by both Clintons in order to protest the war in Iraq. Some idiots even called Bill Clinton a "war criminal" earlier this week because of the Iraq war. And yes, Hillary supported the invasion effort, which is fucked up, but... WTF???
:wtf:

BUSH, CHENEY AND THE REPUBLICAN NEOCONS DID START THIS WAR. They really, really wanted this war and they couldn't' stop until they got it. Nobody would get in their way of getting their precious war without playing the consequences (Plame). But apparently when it's time to mobilize the base, the base turns against the Clintons?

So why chasing the Clintons around? How about every bastard neocon which seems to be making ever more money off conferences and speeches all over the place? What is it? Too afraid to go after the big fish? Are they afraid to be arrested at any neocon speech, so they try disrupting the more open, more tolerant Clinton speeches?

Why I don't see that in the media? It doesn't make sense to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-10-06 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. It's much more difficult to get to Bush, Rumsfeld, Cheney than to Hillary
Bush et al. have the benefit of the Secret Service as well the resources of the federal government, and the Republican apparatchiks carefully screen people of potential protesters and dissidents who won't toe the line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
400Years Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-10-06 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. I guess you missed the protest interrupting Condi Rice
it was posted here yesterday. Quit acting like it doesn't happen just cause someone holds Saint Hillary accountable too.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-10-06 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. I think part of it is
that we feel more betrayed by dems who aren't speaking out more about what a disaster this war is. However, I see protesters fairly frequently pop up in protest at repub speaking engagements. Remember the students at GT who turned their backs on abu gonza?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mom cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-10-06 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. There is a plan to protest Kerry tonight at Harvard.
Edited on Fri Mar-10-06 05:05 PM by mom cat
Here are the details:
Tomorrow (Friday, March 10) John Kerry will make a personal appearance
> at the Kennedy School of Government at 5:45 pm near Harvard Square (at
> 79 JFK St. ) for a "meet and greet" with Harvard Dems. See:
> http://www.harvarddems.com/index.php?option=com_extcalendar&Itemid=36&extmode=
> view&extid=72
>
> We are scheduled as usual to picket his office at 4:30 pm. I suggest
> that we all meet promptly at 4 pm and spend at least 15- 30 minutes
> there. Then those of us who are willing should go to the JFK school
> by car or by T. We can easily get there either way in 30 minutes. We
> will be there in time.
>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressivebydesign Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-10-06 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Because Rove doesn't pay if you protest republicans. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-10-06 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
17. But Bill Clinton is a war criminal. Sanctions killed hundreds of thousand
Bill's Secretary of State said the killing of so many was "worth it". Bill Clinton also started bombing Iraq before Bushie took office.

This kind of denial will get us nowhere. We must deal with history, not wishful thinking. To say that Bill Clinton did these things is not to deny the very real crimes of the Bush Sr or Bush Jr administrations.

To think that we have to say that Clinton was a good man to make the case against Bush jr is so illogical it belongs on some freeper website. In fact, they attempt to make a similar case:
Saddam war criminal.
Therefore Bush is good, because he attacked Saddam (of course, sometimes leaving out that so many are dying and suffering as a result, and the end result for average Iraqis is that they are worse off than before).

Your argument
Bush is bad.
Therefore, Clinton is good (of course, sometimes leaving out that so many are died as a result of his policies).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedSock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-10-06 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. thank you so much for this
Edited on Fri Mar-10-06 06:52 PM by RedSock
This really needs to be said. Bravo!!!

Of course, Bill Clinton is a war criminal.

Duh.

As a lifelong Dem, I really had a problem with Clinton's policies (not his penis). I was excited and voted for him in 1992, then watched as over about 3 weeks after taking office, he systemtically went back on every promise he had made. I voted Nader in 1996.

My god, he ended the federal guarantee of welfare. Which was something Reagan longed to do, but couldn't. Clinton did it.

Let's not rewrite history. Bush is horrifically bad, but Clinton was no prize either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hiley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-10-06 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #4
21. here you go "The Blood is on your Hands"-Protester at Rice/Rumfeld
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-10-06 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #4
24. Protestors never get near Shrub & Co.
He never appears anywhere unless he can get a loyalty oath from every audience member that's verified.

Unless you're one of "the annointed" you don't get closer than a half mile of him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lavender Brown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #4
31. It isn't about the base chasing the Clintons around.
New Yorkers expected more from Hillary. I'm not surprised she's being targeted by some of the people who had the highest hopes for her. They feel let down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressivebydesign Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-10-06 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
8. How much is Rove paying nowadays???
I find the Hillary bashing to be mostly Rovian tactics. You know.. I'm kinda getting used to living under republican rule. I'm starting to enjoy it.. really.. and I won't be pissed AT ALL when these people who call themselves liberals trash every candidate we have that doesn't suit their personal needs OR the ones that are Rove operatives. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hughee99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-10-06 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. That's right!
It's not that Hillary hasn't been a good ally to the anti-war movement, or that someone who's planning to run against her on a true anti-war platform might do well to point this out at every opportunity, it's all about Rove. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 02:46 AM
Response to Reply #8
26. It doesn't have to be a Republican or a War Democrat.
We don't have to settle for a candidate who will never be progressive or for peace.

If Hillary is elected as a hawk, she'll stay a hawk forever.

And the Democrats won't elect another president for years afterwards, since War Democrats always turn the country against the party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-10-06 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
11. Rent-a-duo? My, my, but the Neocons
seem to have fallen on hard times!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 08:07 AM
Response to Reply #11
30. It's cheaper to hire "ultra-liberals" to post online...
With enough sock puppets, two can do the work of a multitude.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakeme2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-10-06 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
13. Hillary I am tired of the words "MOVE ON:
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-10-06 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
15. Greenfield is an asswipe who used to be in the Green Party
What a scumbag.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-10-06 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. so...?
He's still right to hold war supporter HRC's feet to the fire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-10-06 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. So he's a fucking DINO
piss on him and his crackpot protest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-10-06 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. Mike, just more green-baiting on DU. Nothing about relevancy
Edited on Fri Mar-10-06 05:56 PM by Tom Joad
is necessary.

Just like when King was out organizing for civil rights, the Right-wing just brought up that some of his associates were not devoted to the Capitalist system. That had nothing to do with the pros or cons of civil rights, but it helped distract a few simpletons.
Edited for clarity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-10-06 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. gasp! how dare you
be right!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terran1212 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-11-06 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #16
25. exactly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adigal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-10-06 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
20. He is absolutely correct
and although I always thought Eisenhower was paranoid, I am certain he was correct now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laughing Mirror Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 04:53 AM
Response to Original message
27. What the hell does that chickenhawk hag care?
She who kept banging the war drums louder and louder, while making sure her own brat wasn't shipped over there.

What a hypocrite! What a fraud!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 08:04 AM
Response to Reply #27
29. Please define chickenhawk....
In a way that applies to Ms. Clinton. And why are you calling her a "hag"?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC