Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Archbishop fears Church 'rupture' (gay rights)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-05-06 11:27 AM
Original message
Archbishop fears Church 'rupture' (gay rights)
Last Updated: Sunday, 5 March 2006, 07:20 GMT

Archbishop fears Church 'rupture'

The Archbishop of Canterbury has warned that the worldwide Anglican Church faces a fundamental "rupture" on the issue of homosexuality.

Dr Rowan Williams told BBC One's The Heaven and Earth Show he feared any split could take decades to heal.

Traditionalists have given the Church in the US until June to reverse its approach on ordaining gay clergy - or face expulsion from the Communion.

Some liberals back a looser, federal structure for the Anglican Communion.

Dr Williams said he feared any split would run too deep to make this possible.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/4775446.stm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-05-06 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. maybe the "Rapture" was just a misprint.and really meant 'Rupture'.. i had
one and it really hurt.. for about 10 years..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-05-06 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. You should have had the surgery sooner, then.
Seriously, they're just arguing about that commanment from Jesus, to love a neighbor as yourself, period. No conditions. Judge not lest ye be judged.

If they can't manage that on an insitutional level, never mind the personal that we all struggle with, then they're no longer fit to be called Christian.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buddysmellgood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-05-06 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
2. Hey! Sounds like another great reason to start killing each other!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TallahasseeGrannie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-05-06 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. No, dear
Episcopalians don't kill one another. Too messy. We just snub each other. Much worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rowdyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-05-06 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. LOL....
Edited on Sun Mar-05-06 12:49 PM by Rowdyboy
I nominate this for "Post of the Day". As as fellow one of "God's Frozen People" I agree with you: "We just snub each other. Much worse" :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-05-06 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. The US Episcopals Charter came from
Scotland and doen't bow down to Englands' Archbishop of Cant. The US Episcopal Church is one of the most progressive in the US.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bill McBlueState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-05-06 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
3. I'm not sure why they fear rupture so much
I think it's good for the mainline denominations to articulate clearly where they stand on these issues. If the dissenters want to form a new church, they should do so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-05-06 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. nail on head.
i was talking to my priest over coffee the other day and two things popped up --

one: how long can the liberal episcopal/anglican church keep having the same conversation with conservatives over and over?
remember this isn't JUST about gay folk -- but about the ordination of women as well.
for me -- if you don't want to ordain women THEN DON'T BAPTISE THEM!

second: the coming political wave may well be one of coallitions.
it's easier for people to relate to each other from the strength of familiar territory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ret5hd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-05-06 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. rupture = less money for the original organization.
it's that simple. it's all about the money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-05-06 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. The African and Asian churches on the homo witchhunt don't send money
to the central church--they take money from it. If Brits, Americans, Australians, Canadians, etc. left, the churches led by people like Akinola would probably go under.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-05-06 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #9
18. Absolutely
and the churches in the UK, the US, Australia, Canada, etc. have only minorities, (loud, but small) opposed to this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-05-06 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. Sometimes I think that the Robinson controversy is a power/money
grab. African, Asian, and Latin American bishops are now pushing American homophobe parishes to withdraw from their own dioceses and align with them.

Of course, this violates Anglican polity, and some have been quite brazen about it, even going into American parishes to officiate at services without even the courtesy of notifying the local bishop--a big no-no. But, there's potentially lots of money to be made by picking off American parishes, and I tend to think that is at least part of what's going on here. After all, these bishops have no problem with things like polygamy, human rights abuses, treating women as property, etc. but we are supposed to believe that the thought of a gay bishop 10,000 miles away is driving them to righteous indignation? That seems unlikely to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-05-06 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Yeah -- good point.
And a part of me thinks -- hey, if they want to take Scaife's money, all the better -- less of it here to cause harm.

Cynical, aren't I?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-05-06 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. True--I wish Scaife would send all his cash to the "Southern Cone."
That beats spending it on installing a fascist government in this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bill McBlueState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-05-06 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. I understand that they would fear that at first
But I think there are a lot of people out there who would be willing to join a large church that was unambiguously opposed to discrimination against LGBT people.

If conservatives split off from the Anglican Communion, the remaining church would take a hit at first, but membership would rebound as liberal non-chuchgoers began to feel undeniably welcome in Anglican churches.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-05-06 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. I know my church lost a couple of families over Gene Robinson's
consecration as bishop.

But we've gained much more than that -- many who have said that's why they've come to our parish. (A nearby parish is one of the "CT six" -- aligned with the ultra-conservatives.)

I absolutely agree with you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-05-06 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
4. As an Anglican, I say, "Bring on the rupture."
I see no reason why an international church should be dominated by third world fundamentalists.

Some liberals back a looser, federal structure for the Anglican Communion.

We already have that and always have. National churches are independent--there is no centralized hierarchy in Anglicanism. The Archbishop of Canterbury is first among equals, not a pope.

This worked fine until bigots like Peter Akinola decided to make everyone else dance to their hateful tune.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TallahasseeGrannie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-05-06 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. There is more to it than the gay issue
and it revolves around contemporary theology. Some bishops have said that the resurrection was just a metaphor, etc.

All the churches in Tallahassee except one have split down the middle on these issues. It really also has a lot to do with who the Bishop is. I think the split could be compromised with some creative bishop coverage, allowing a parish to designate itself as a traditional parish and be served by a traditional bishop.

But even the "Anglican" communion that the churches are splitting to have schisms. One group is against the ordination of women, another is not.

Of course there is always the possibility of the national group backtracking on the Gene Robinson issue. I wonder how likely that is?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-05-06 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. If they give in to Akinola and the others and backtrack on Robinson,
then I'm gone. Same if they backtrack on ordaining women.

What it really comes down to is whether world Anglicanism will become fundamentalist in order to suit fanatical bigots in the third world. It doesn't help, of course, that many of these same bigots condone, and even practice, polygamy, on the grounds that it is "part of the culture," but suddenly get all traditional when it comes to what other cultures countenance.

The bishops in Africa, Asia, and the Caribbean are perfectly free to do as they please in their own dioceses, but that's not enough for them. Just like other fundamentalists, they seek to dictate to the rest of the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-05-06 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #10
20. I don't think that will happen
These "American Anglican" churches are few. And even within those parishes, there are people who stay for tradition's sake, and dislike the turn their parish has taken.

And on other issues closer to theological doctrine -- well there's such a tradition in Episcopalianism for diversity and open inquiry. There seems to be no problem, at least up here, for differing opinions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-05-06 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
11. I don't see the problem.
Splits over fundamental ideas are a natural part of the process. It's happened hundreds of times in all faiths.

Big whoop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MasonJar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-05-06 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
16. Our bishop in Louisville, Kentucky has supported the ordination
Edited on Sun Mar-05-06 06:44 PM by MasonJar
of the gay bishop in New England. He has dissenters, but has stood his ground and gained enormous respect from many of us. A man who follows his conscience is often criticized by the people who have to forgo the status quo. I feel that many religious followers of all sects are cornered by the prejudices that they have been taught. It is hard to let go of ideas ingrained in one from youth, especially if the individual is not young. Patience is bringing hope I think, just as the government of W is assisting the bigots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-05-06 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
17. Rowan just needs to grow a backbone
As long as these far right clerics think they can succeed in pushing him around, this will continue. Once they know the game is up, a few will leave, most will grumble and get over it. Eventually, they'll look back in amazement at the bigotry that was.


They don't have the numbers, they don't have moral right on their side, and they don't have time on their side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-05-06 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
24. let it rupture
I know that I won't lose any sleep and I doubt too many of the members of my church would either

I believe in my heart as a gay Christian, I am right and those who support an inclusive church are right

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC