Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

FEMA: New Madrid earthquake preparedness is agency priority

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
HeeBGBz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 08:23 PM
Original message
FEMA: New Madrid earthquake preparedness is agency priority
FEMA: New Madrid earthquake preparedness is agency priority

snip

"ST. LOUIS - Preparing for a catastrophic earthquake along the New Madrid fault is a priority, a FEMA official said Friday before a congressional field hearing on government readiness to handle natural disasters.

"New Madrid is at the top of the list," Michel Pawlowski, section chief of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, said. "It's our primary objective."

Pawlowski told a congressional committee that FEMA has "significant concerns" for the potential of a catastrophic earthquake equal in magnitude to those that struck parts of the Mississippi River Valley in 1811-1812, and again in 1895. The estimated magnitude of those earthquakes is 7.5 or 8. The probability of a magnitude 6 or larger earthquake is 25 percent to 50 percent over the next 50 years.

Even a magnitude 7 earthquake would destroy more than 60 percent of buildings in St. Louis and Memphis, Tenn., because most buildings predate building requirements aimed at resisting the shock, officials estimate."

I don't know about anyone else but this creeps me out. Like the war games before 911.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. Primary objective??? What about Katrina's survivors who have
yet to be helped? What kind of agency is this that can just walk away in the middle of a job that's far from complete? :grr: :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeeBGBz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. They just wrote off Katrina
Gotta look to the future and forget the past, doncha know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-26-06 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #3
26. Tag line on Fox today"-Should handouts be stopped to N. O.?
(paraphasing)-----anyway--some quests said yes--pull yourself up by your bootstraps. etc etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeeBGBz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-26-06 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #26
30. I wish anyone who spouts that shit
Should be forced to live on a damaged lot and sleep in a tent for a couple of months. Watch them pull themselves out of that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
17. they can't just write off preparedness until all of katrina is cleaned up-
that jobs going to take years- and nothing in the article says that they're just going to "walk away" from the katrina stuff, anyway- it's a large multi-facted department that's responsible for more than just one hurricane's mess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'd like to know how that risk assessment is done...
I guess the value of New Orleans is so depressed it dropped it on the list.
What is Chertoff planning to do? Order a fleet of ice trucks from Maine?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EuroObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. You're joking.
The destruction on the Gulf Coast, economists say, provided a HUGE BOOST to US GDP (all that reconstruction spending, get it?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auntie Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-26-06 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #8
43. Plus it got rid of a lot of Dem voters replaced by future rich GOPers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
4. If this creeps you out, don't read the details of the 1812 earthquake
The Ohio and Mississippi rivers flowed backwards. They cut new channels far from their old ones. Islands sank, and parts of the town of New Madrid disappeared, never to be seen again. Reelfoot Lake in TN was formed. The only reason the loss of life wasn't greater was that not very many people lived there then. I used to live in Southern IL and even in the 80s we had to have earthquake proof new schools and were required to have earthquake drills. There are more fault lines in the area than the New Madrid fault, and these have been active in my lifetime, to the extent that they have done major structural damage. If the Big One hits, which apparently happens every 200 years or so, there will be damage and devistation from St. Louis to Memphis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeeBGBz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Oh, I am well aware of the 1811-1812 quakes
Memphis would sink or collapse because of the soil its built upon. St Louis would be in terrible shape also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. It's worse than that
There are still scars from the 1812 quake to be found in Southern Illinois if you know where to look. The crazy thing about this planning business is that they've been at it for over 20 years now-I was teaching Illinois history at the time, and remember paying attention to the calls for plans to be made. The Lawrenceville Fault has also caused damage as far east as Indiana, and there are small quakes at New Madrid every day. And don't forget the levee system-that would likely fail. No problem in a time of drought, but if it is flood time, look out. Also remember that this will mess up the navagation system for a long time to come-multiply the port of New Orleans by a factor of at least 3.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EuroObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. .
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
5. More opportunities to give money to donors n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enid602 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 08:33 PM
Response to Original message
6. quake
Much of downtown Memphis is built on land reclaimed from the Mississippi; bad for earthquakes. The 1811 quake toppled buildings in Washington, DC. Much of the construction in all of the cities along the fault is unreinforced brick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SheilaT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 08:33 PM
Response to Original message
7. Actually, the New Madrid quakes
were extremely powerful, 8 point somethings. It's very difficult to estimate with a lot of accuracy so many years later, but they were felt as far away as Boston.

The first tremors were in December of 1811, and lasted well into the new year. There were a series of strong earthquakes, and the citizens of New Madrid, which was a very small community at the time, lived outdoors for several months in bitter cold weather, because the ground shook almost constantly. If anything similar were to happen today St. Louis and Kansas city would be destroyed, as well as many other cities in that part of the country.

It's difficult to assess how much damage would be done, because very few Europeans lived in that part of the country then, which means we don't have too much in the way of good records. That area was largely "uninhabited", meaning the Indians who lived there simply didn't count, so far as white people were concerned. More to the point, any records the indigenous people would have kept have long since vanished.

If you can get your hands on On Shaky Ground by John Nance, it has several excellent chapters on the New Madrid quakes. It is by far the best earthquake book I've ever read, and I've read most of them. It starts out with the Good Friday earthquake in Alaska in 1964 (did you know that the town of Valdez, Alaska, had to be completely relocated because of that earthquake?) and goes on with a very succinct description of plate tectonics. I can't recommend the book highly enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-26-06 12:11 AM
Response to Reply #7
27. thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frustratedlady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
9. That's scary news for me....
as I live along the path of that fault. The earthquake would be bad enough, but to be told that FEMA would be taking care of us, scares the beejeebers outta me.x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BiggJawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-26-06 12:55 AM
Response to Reply #9
29. Yeah, me too.
Screw the "72 hours" worth of stuff the Red Cross advises keeping on hand, I'm stock-piling 3 months of shit.
And when that's gone, I'm headin' for the border.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
et in Arcadia ego Donating Member (88 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
13. heh..
Ironically, I first heard about the New Madrid fault last year from an online Russian Science publication..

They were wondering why American authorities were not more concerned with what they saw as a strong potential for cataclysmic destruction.

Rest easy now knowing that FEMA's on the job, YO..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Believe me, those around the Mississippi river valley know all about it.
the 1812 quake was one of the strongest on record for the lower 48, and having one now, with the way both Memphis, St. Louis, even Chicago are built up can be disasterous for our cities. We not only have to worry about the devastation from the actual quake, but the flooding that will result will probably wipe many cities off the map.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-26-06 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #16
37. Don't forget Kentucky Lake.
Edited on Sun Feb-26-06 10:52 AM by Zynx
Otherwise known as a very large dammed river. Wouldn't want to count on that dam surviving a big earthquake in the New Madrid zone.

That basically means everyone in Paducah would be killed and the Mississippi would flood along its entire length.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
14. Ok I have to say this is a surprise...
evidentally this is definitely a big possibility...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
et in Arcadia ego Donating Member (88 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
15. links
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
area51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-26-06 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #15
33. Welcome to DU, et in Arcadia ego.
The rest of this is a general comment.

So, FEMA is on top of planning for a possible New Madrid quake? Boy, that makes me feel all better considering the bang-up job they did w/Katrina.... :scared: :mad:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-26-06 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #15
41. Welcome!!!...Tell me. I can't quite understand the jargon from Berkley,
What does this recent information mean?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fed-up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
18. Fema doesn't care if the San Andreas goes 1st as it's in a BLUE state n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-26-06 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #18
35. Actually, New Madrid is capable of killing far more people
Edited on Sun Feb-26-06 10:41 AM by Zynx
California builds with earthquakes in mind - most new construction there is absurdly difficult to knock down. Most of Memphis and St. Louis don't build, period. A ton of the structures down there are still "original" construction, i.e. badly reinforced or unreinforced brick. Plus Memphis is build on a sand bar that would almost certainly liquify.

The rock in the eastern part of the US also transmits seismic waves far better than California - a LA or San Fran earthquake will only effect LA or San Fran, while a New Madrid earthquake will gut Memphis and St.Louis and do serious damage as far as Chicago and Cincy.

You are basically talking an event that would seriously damage several entire STATES.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-26-06 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #35
39. To wit: Shaking map from a Mag 6. Have a look at this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ben_thayer Donating Member (344 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
19. Here's an interesting site
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
20. Just like being prepared for a hurricane striking NO was a 'top priority'?
We all recall that a NO hurricane had been on their "top priority"
list for years...
and look how well they handled that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
951-Riverside Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
21. Let me guess "Pawlowski" is yet another preppie white jackass
FEMA is WAY too white for my taste.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
22. So now everyone in St. Louis can sleep very well tonight
knowing FEMA is on the ball.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theHandpuppet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
23. This is what worries me, folks...
Edited on Sat Feb-25-06 09:56 PM by theHandpuppet
If the Yellowstone Caldera ever blows again, we can kiss our collective asses a big sayonara.

Take a look at the seismicity maps for the past week at this link: http://www.seis.utah.edu/HTML/YPEvents7Days.html
I have this site bookmarked and check it regularly, at least twice a week. I have never seen a cluster of quakes appear as indicated on the map for this past week. Small quakes but still an anomaly that concerns me.

Edited to add: Please note the quakes indicated have all occurred within the past day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-26-06 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #23
31. Agreed, this is probably the most potentially devastating
Edited on Sun Feb-26-06 09:54 AM by Virginia Dare
natural disaster facing this country, doesn't get much press. It could literally blow the U.S. apart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlaGranny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-26-06 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #31
38. Actually, it would affect the entire world -
It would affect a great part of the US first, but then over about a year or so, cause the earth to cool, crop faliure, famine, and a great deal of the population (human and otherwise) of the entire planet to die from starvation. Not a pretty picture, but it has happened before and will probably happen again. It is just one of the earth's ways of occasionally cleaning house.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DELUSIONAL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
24. Militarize the state and start shooting blacks & poor folk --
Edited on Sat Feb-25-06 10:19 PM by DELUSIONAL
That in essence will be the (real) plan.

Lock down the area and don't let anyone escape -- except in a body bag.

We saw what the bushie gang did in New Orleans and they had plenty of warning.

An earthquake has essentially no warning. Except the warning that "the big one" could come anytime. Ask the folks on the West Coast.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 11:56 PM
Response to Original message
25. Hmmmm.....Bush is looking for another natural disaster to go his way?
Interesting set of objectives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-26-06 12:52 AM
Response to Reply #25
28. and St.Louis and Memphis the heartland .......where goods
and transport go through for the nation... home of predominantly Republicans who are ticked off at Bush right now and may go democratic...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-26-06 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
32. It better be
I sure don't want to be shook up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oreegone Donating Member (726 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-26-06 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
34. This is surprising news?
Guess we really have no terrorist attacks to worry about, This is new news? Pick a fault any fault. Not that I don't sympathize with the people in the region, but this seems a far stretch when hurricane season is just around the corner and we haven't even cleaned up from the last one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-26-06 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
36. Ahh, New Madrid. National devastation only 10% of the US knows about
Basically, a 8.0 or worse would instantly kill at least a hundred thousand people and devastate most of Missouri, Arkansas, Kentucky (bye-bye Kentucky Lake) and Tennessee, while doing serious damage to Illinois, Indiana and Ohio.

What makes it worse is virtually nothing in that part of the country was built with earthquakes in mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-26-06 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #36
42. Well, true, but some of the newer buildings have been built by code.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davsand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-26-06 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
40. If New Madrid cuts loose I am not waiting for FEMA to help.
I watched how FEMA f**ked up the "help" for the Gulf Coast and I am not waiting around to see it happen here. My family will be in a car (any car!) headed for someplace else just as soon as I can round them up...

Several years ago I knew a guy who was doing a Post Doc in Engineering. His primary focus was on earthquake prone areas and the structures located in those zones.

I asked him about New Madrid one time and he told me that if it ever did give a big shake that there were not many places anywhere in about a 6 or 7 state area that were gonna be safe from damage, with much of it being catastrophic to the cities in those areas.

I kinda questioned hm on it--after all this is Central Illinois and I can remember exactly two times in my life that I've ever felt any kind of seismic event. His response was something to the effect that the two I can remember were still WELL below the magnitude that is possible with that fault line.

He pointed out that there have been events on New Madrid pretty regularly that were not noticed except by seismographers, and that may be the best cause for optimism with New Madrid. In his opinion, the faults that DON'T shake sometimes are actually more dangerous because when they let go--it can be a really BIG adjustment all in one or two heaves.

He also commented on the fact that even tho we've known for a long time that New Madrid was there, the lack of noticeable movement has let builders and the lawmakers that create zoning and building codes, avoid improving building design and construction to withstand earthquakes.

He was not optimistic about Memphis and St. Louis high rises along with bridges, sewage treatment plants, Dams, and Nuke power plants in that multi state area if anything serious ever happens with New Madrid...

I dunno if he was right about it all, but I do know that I sure as hell don't want to be hanging out here waiting for FEMA to save me and mine.



Laura
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-26-06 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
44. Well the big logistic problem is the Mississippi & Missouri Rivers
St.Louis is surrounded by them you need to cross bridges from Illinois to get to it and bridges over the Missouri to get to the west of it ....... which means that going south is going into the damage ridden areas of Memphis... going North you have to cross bridges... thats what they are worried about
access... probably only by air and I haven't a clue how the airport is going to be...

and on top of it Missouri has a terrible reputation for its roads and bridges maintenance...

its going to be tough to get out if those bridges are broken and unsafe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC