Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT: G.O.P. Sees Gain in Bribe Case Involving Louisiana Democrat

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 09:06 AM
Original message
NYT: G.O.P. Sees Gain in Bribe Case Involving Louisiana Democrat
G.O.P. Sees Gain in Bribe Case Involving Louisiana Democrat
By CARL HULSE
Published: January 13, 2006


WASHINGTON, Jan. 12 - Congressional Republicans pounced Thursday on a corruption case implicating a veteran Louisiana Democratic lawmaker, citing it as evidence that wrongdoing on Capitol Hill is a bipartisan matter.

A spokesman for the National Republican Congressional Committee said that Representative Nancy Pelosi of California, the House Democratic leader, was ignoring the case involving Representative William J. Jefferson of Louisiana while pressing for ethics investigations of a number of House Republicans tied to Jack Abramoff, the lobbyist who pleaded guilty last week to corruption charges.

"If Nancy Pelosi can't clean up her own caucus, how does she expect voters to not see right through her attempts at political opportunism?" asked the spokesman, Carl Forti.

On Wednesday, Brett M. Pfeffer, 37, pleaded guilty in Federal District Court in Northern Virginia to two bribery counts related to a business deal designed to provide high-speed Internet service and cable television in Nigeria. In the plea agreement, Mr. Pfeffer said that a lawmaker identified as Representative A solicited bribes in exchange for using his powers as a member of Congress to promote that deal and a similar one in Ghana.

Though Representative A is not named, the plea agreement says Mr. Pfeffer served as his legislative assistant from 1995 through 1998, a period when he worked for Mr. Jefferson. Federal law enforcement officials confirmed Thursday that the lawmaker in question was Mr. Jefferson. Mr. Pfeffer has agreed to cooperate in the investigation....


http://www.nytimes.com/2006/01/13/politics/13bribe.html?oref=login
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
1. Matthew 7: 3-5
3 Why do you see the speck in your neighbor's eye, but do not notice the log in your own eye? 4 Or how can you say to your neighbor, 'Let me take the speck out of your eye,' while the log is in your own eye? 5 You hypocrite, first take the log out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to take the speck out of your neighbor's eye.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PATRICK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
2. Will backfire if they keep a scorecard
of perps and amounts and how much good for the public came out of the legislation. And while compiling the stuff that shows the Democratic party actually free of such things than at at any other time in its history(which is why we have more pollyanna elitists than skilled wheeler dealers) how about:

The Hall of Shame for all recently indicted members of each party. The numbers of GOP sex crimes, scandals etc. is far out of proportion to the relative numbers of both parties now serving or serving time.

Make a list- and take out some ads. And remind people this is WITH GOP dominance in the legal system and media to cover up and protect their own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
3. How about that- find an obscure case and whore for the far right
Edited on Fri Jan-13-06 09:17 AM by depakid
while sitting on evidence of Republican illegalities and malfeasance. Nice.

Guess Bush has the dirt on the owners and editors via illegal wiretaps.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
4.  Democrats didn't take bribes from Abramoff.
May Mr. Pfeffer, and perhaps Rep. Jefferson, roast in a lesser Hell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
5. Making this into an Issue Can Backfire Big Time
I will be making flyers this weekend about Republican Corruption.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
6. Democrats want investigation Republicans don't. What more do you need
I would not be one bit surprised if a Democrat or two were to be corrupt. After all we all know Power Corrupts and Absolute power corrupt absolutely. Let the chips fall where they may and clean the filth out of Congress. I suspect you will never hear a Republican say anything similar to what I just said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PassingFair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. But I'll second you, Toots!
In fact, I think a rotten dem or two would HELP in the investigation of the pukes.

Especially if one is tangled up with Abramoff.

That way, they couldn't slough it off as "partisan attacks", and the media wouldn't steer clear of the corruption story like a kid on a bike avoiding a pile of doggydoo on the sidewalk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC