Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

ABC LBN: Former 'dirty bomb' Suspect Jose Padilla Pleaded Not Guilty

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 11:24 AM
Original message
ABC LBN: Former 'dirty bomb' Suspect Jose Padilla Pleaded Not Guilty
Edited on Thu Jan-12-06 11:28 AM by sabra
http://abcnews.go.com/?CMP=EMC-1396

Breaking News FORMER 'DIRTY BOMB' SUSPECT JOSE PADILLA PLEADED NOT GUILTY TO CRIMINAL CHARGES HE WAS PART OF A SECRET TERRORIST NETWORK

more info:


http://www.bradenton.com/mld/bradenton/13610088.htm

Ex-'combatant' Padilla pleads not guilty to terror cell charges


MIAMI - Jose Padilla, the U.S. citizen held by the Bush administration for over three years as an illegal "enemy combatant," pleaded not guilty Thursday to criminal charges that he was part of a secret network that supported violent Muslim extremists around the world.

Padilla entered the plea before U.S. Magistrate Judge Barry Garber one week after he was transferred from military to civilian custody. Garber then began hearing arguments to determine whether Padilla should be released on bail, which is opposed by federal prosecutors.

Padilla, 35, was indicted in November on charges of conspiring to murder U.S. nationals and providing material support to terrorists as part of a North American cell that provided money, material and fighters for violent Islamic jihad. He faces a potential life sentence.

The former Chicago gang member and Muslim convert was held for 3 1/2 years as an enemy combatant after U.S. officials claimed he plotted as an al-Qaida operative to detonate a radioactive "dirty bomb" and blow up apartment buildings in major U.S. cities. But the indictment makes no mention of those allegations.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
1. Since the charges against this fellow
have changed since he was first arrested and held (illegally, imho), I'm wondering if there will be enough to convict him even on this charge?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I'm wondering if a not guilty verdict would help him any.
Since the admin is expressly reserving the right to throw him back in the brig even after a not guilty verdict as an enemy combatant or whatever legal-sounding term the USG dreams up as a euphemism for the permanently jailed without trial.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yes, but such is the nature of BushAmerican justice.
So much for "the Shining City on the Hill" and all that crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. These Thugs-- make up their own rules
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
5. He pled not guilty? Interesting.
Also interesting is the disappearance of our irregular verbs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 04:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC