Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Nonprofit Group Linked to DeLay Was Funded Mostly by Clients of Abramoff

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-30-05 10:59 PM
Original message
Nonprofit Group Linked to DeLay Was Funded Mostly by Clients of Abramoff
Edited on Fri Dec-30-05 11:40 PM by cal04
An Extensive Web of Financial Ties
Nonprofit Group Linked to DeLay Was Funded Mostly by Clients of Abramoff
The U.S. Family Network, a public advocacy group that operated in the 1990s with close ties to Rep. Tom DeLay and claimed to be a nationwide grass-roots organization, was funded almost entirely by corporations linked to embattled lobbyist Jack Abramoff, according to tax records and former associates of the group.

During its five-year existence, the U.S. Family Network raised $2.5 million but kept its donor list secret. The list, obtained by The Washington Post, shows that $1 million of its revenue came in a single 1998 check from a now-defunct London law firm whose former partners will not identify the money's origins. Two former associates of Edwin A. Buckham, the congressman's former chief of staff and the organizer of the U.S. Family Network, said Buckham told them the funds came from Russian oil and gas executives. Abramoff had been working closely with two such Russian energy executives on their Washington agenda, and the lobbyist and Buckham had helped organize a 1997 Moscow visit by DeLay.

The former president of the U.S. Family Network said Buckham told him that Russians contributed $1 million to the group in 1998 specifically to influence DeLay's vote on legislation the International Monetary Fund needed to finance a bailout of the collapsing Russian economy. A spokesman for DeLay, who is fighting in a Texas state court unrelated charges of illegal fundraising, denied that the contributions influenced the former House majority leader's political activities. The Russian energy executives who worked with Abramoff denied yesterday knowing anything about the million-dollar London transaction described in tax documents.

Whatever the real motive for the contribution of $1 million -- a sum not prohibited by law but extraordinary for a small, nonprofit group -- the steady stream of corporate payments detailed on the donor list makes it clear that Abramoff's long-standing alliance with DeLay was sealed by a much more extensive web of financial ties than previously known.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/30/AR2005123001480.html

one page print version
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/30/AR2005123001480_pf.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Scout1071 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-30-05 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yes. Keep it comin'.
Let's take a look at all their so-called "nonprofit" groups.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
waiting for hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-30-05 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. I hope that when he goes down
he really hits rock bottom...DeLay needs a severe ass whooping..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-30-05 11:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. Russian oil and gas = mob. Russian mob. This is great. keep them
coming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-01-06 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
48. The GOP Was Funneling Russian Money Into US Politics!
:D

And they think their party exemplifies "patriotism".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CHIMO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-30-05 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. A Voice from the Past
Clarke: Nations using internet to spy
Friday 05 November 2004, 21:34 Makka Time, 18:34 GMT

The world's most advanced military powers are using the internet to spy on their enemies and prepare digital attacks against targets, a leading cyber security expert has said.

"When there's a major cyber incident it's very difficult to prove most of the time who did it," said Richard Clarke on Friday, former White House adviser on national security and cyber threats.

http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/D29B0874-8690-4929-9BFE-44E59F217582.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lebkuchen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 05:23 AM
Response to Reply #4
21. Clarke: "Maybe the U.S. too" ??
...said Richard Clarke on Friday, former White House adviser on national security and cyber threats.

Clarke had to have known U.S. spying on citizens without warrant was going on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SushiFan Donating Member (309 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-30-05 11:37 PM
Response to Original message
5. Hah,hah,hah............Delay!!
The Sugarland Cockroach is going DOWN.

He's squirming like one right now as the light is shone on him thanks to Ronnie Earle. But the self-saving stool pidgeoning Abramoff is doing at this very moment, means that the cockroach Delay will be crushed to smithereens by his own but buddy Jack! Halleluiah, there IS a God afterall in Texas.

Now, on to GWB+crime family..............
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seafan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-30-05 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
6. Another clip:
(Emphasis added)

snip

No legal bar exists to a $1 million donation by a foreign entity to a group such as the U.S. Family Network, according to Marcus Owens, a Washington lawyer who directed the IRS's office of tax-exempt organizations from 1990 to 2000 and who reviewed, at The Post's request, the tax returns filed by the U.S. Family Network.

But "a million dollars is a staggering amount of money to come from a foreign source" because such a donor would not be entitled to claim the tax deduction allowed for U.S. citizens, Owens said. "Giving large donations to an organization whose purposes are as ambiguous as these . . . is extraordinary. I haven't seen that before. It suggests something else is going on.

end snip


This article is loaded with intricate details.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-01-06 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #6
51. it's great., get the IRS on this. They harassed a
single mom friend of mine who works for $10/hr. over her deduction for her youngest child who lives with her. She had to hire a lawyer because the IRS kept auditing and harassing her even though she had done nothing wrong. I'm glad the IRS has better things to do this year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 12:05 AM
Response to Original message
7. How convenient. Can this information be sent to the people of his district
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jane Austin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 12:17 AM
Response to Original message
8. This is absolutely dynamite stuff!
Somebody at the WP has been doing some hard work.

Most good investigating is doing what is evident here: Lots of phoning to companies with similar names; checking with former partners at the London law office; talking to people who used to work with the various principals; checking every last detail.

Not very glamorous, but that's what's behind really good reporting.

Good thing they got this in under the wire for this year's Pulitzers. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 12:40 AM
Response to Original message
9. Wait a minute...
I thought the House of Representatives was on an extended vacation, so that The Hamper could clear up those pesky allegations about money laundering, and return to his rightful position as King of the Most Corrupt Congress Ever. How's that going to work now, with more criminal charges likely to rain down on Hot Tub Tom? Maybe Congress won't reconvene until 2007, when we will have a majority. That would be find with me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluerum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #9
26. The "hamper" - thats a good one. He is full of dirty laundry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tin Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #9
34. I love it - Tom "the hamper" Delay!
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-01-06 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #9
52. lol, "the Hamper"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 01:05 AM
Response to Original message
10. Has the WP has been sitting on this story?
Releasing it on Saturday which happens to be New Year's Eve?

Talk about your year-end news dump. :wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zen Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 01:08 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. I think the Abramoff plea deal had a lot to do with the WP story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 01:10 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. That makes sense. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TygrBright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 01:11 AM
Response to Original message
13. Hee-hee.... I love this line:
>>A former Abramoff associate said the two executives "wanted to contribute to DeLay" and clearly had the resources to do it. At one point, Koulakovsky asked during a dinner in Moscow "what would happen if the DeLays woke up one morning" and found a luxury car in their front driveway, the former associate said. They were told the DeLays "would go to jail and you would go to jail."<<

Looks like they're on their way!

gleefully,
Bright
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JusticeForAll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 01:32 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. that's the same line I liked best!
This is a very good sign of things to come. These bastards are going down!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amandabeech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 04:48 AM
Response to Reply #13
20. Ah, shucks! Those Russkies are just a bunch of good ol' boy
bidnessmen. Why, all they wanted was a good profit and no taxes. What's wrong with that? What's a few little gifts among friends?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Spock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 01:50 AM
Response to Original message
15. This is so incredible
The amount of malfeasance by these fellows seems to be unbounded!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 02:07 AM
Response to Original message
16. He has the audacity to run for his district again!!!
after all this evidence!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagickMuffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 02:39 AM
Response to Original message
17. Bring the Hammer Down on the Sugarland Cockroach
Hopefully all of this is going to stick.

Of course all of us here know that this is all a conspiracy against Bug Boy. He hasn't done anything wrong, just little bribes, kick-backs and payoffs. Nothing illegal about that, we would all do the exact same thing.
It's the moral and values we would all hold dear!:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 02:48 AM
Response to Original message
18. Look at who works for these non profits to see
how Delay is connected....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
banana republican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 03:03 AM
Response to Original message
19. I thought it was illegal to accept foreign campaign contributions?? n/t
Edited on Sat Dec-31-05 03:03 AM by banana republican
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ktlyon Donating Member (733 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-01-06 08:00 AM
Response to Reply #19
44. me too
?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-01-06 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #19
49. It Is. Hence Abramoff Was Accepting It/Funneling It Into Politics
it's called money laundering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spinbaby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 07:21 AM
Response to Original message
22. Just when you think they couldn't be more corrupt...
...they somehow manage. The Republican party is one big money-laundering scheme.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tin Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 08:10 AM
Response to Original message
23. big K&R for the republican culture of corruption - n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
24. Law firms as intermediaries
Edited on Sat Dec-31-05 09:10 AM by formercia
I've been seeing a lot of that in organizations connected with the GOP. It may be common practice but it surely smells like a cutout to me. Claiming attorney client privilege is just one more barrier to an investigation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LizW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. They learned it from the drug dealers
And that's why they should be charged under RICO.

It is appalling that the corruption could get this bad. It is clear that this is money laundering, bribery and selling of influence to foreign interests. It is despicable, and DeLay and any others doing this should go to prison for a very, long, long time.

Get these people out of my government!

:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tin Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #25
28. Talk about treason - congressmen selling votes to foreign interests?
If these allegations are true, Delay et al should be tried for treason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-01-06 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #28
54. and don't forget, * says DeLay is innocent so makes me wonder
what Bush's ties to these oil profiteers really are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #25
30. Why RICO is so important
Money is power. With RICO you can do more than throw someone in jail, you can go after their assets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
27. Repubs Only Have The ILLUSION OF GRASSROOTS
That's all they ever had. It was ALWAYS a scam propped up by laundered money and election fraud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #27
31. It's called Astroturf support
Edited on Sat Dec-31-05 11:29 AM by formercia
It only looks like grass from a distance and has no roots whatsoever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #27
36. This is the problem with FAKE movements........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donkeyotay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #27
39. Exactly. A populist scam propped up by organized crime
I picked up an old book in the Goodwill called, "When the Pentagon was for Sale" because I thought the title sounded quaint. It's amazing how much the last defense contractor rape of the taxpayer looked like this one. And you would have thought that companies like Unisys that got caught with their hands in the cookie jar would have been barred from contracting. Many of the GOP players around then are still around and still doing the national security scam.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-01-06 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #39
50. Elmer Gantry's of the 21st century.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PCIntern Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
29. I find it vaguely ironic
that the Russian's Wall came down at the 'request' of St. Ronnie, so that the bidnessmen could engage in Capitalism leading to the inevitable crony capitalism leading to the inevitable attempts to bribe American politicians and thus the downfall of the Reagan revolution with any luck.

It reminds me of a friend of mine who once said that in the old days the casinos used to let you at least hold the money for a while before they took it all. Now, you just drain.

For these guys, all the societal boundaries have been swept away, like the levees in New Orleans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maestro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
32. There not too much more to say.
DeLay is so dirty. It reminds me of that mayor in New York in the 1800's. What was his name, Tammany (sp?)?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Great Escape Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. Tammany Hall Was the Political Machine That Ran NYC ....
pretty much up through LaGuardia. Boss Tweed was the union leader that was the political boss, although, I don't think he was ever mayor?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maestro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. You're right.
That's it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #33
37. Is this what you're thinking of?
NO ONE BETTER EXEMPLIFIED the twentieth century's moral, cultural, and physical shift in the city's body politic than legendary mayor James J. "Jimmy" Walker, who first came to political light as a Tammany supporter of Governor Al Smith. A Democratic state senator in the early twenties, Walker was elected mayor in the fall of 1925, a halcyon time in America of easy money, easy virtue, and even easier vice. Walker personified the city's rebellious attitude against social restriction in an era that began with the passage in 1919 of the Volstead Act, which enforced the national ban on the sale (but not the private consumption) of alcohol. The purpose of the federal government at first seemed clear enough: to discourage the growing immortality that the nation's newest craze, nightclubbing, had produced, nowhere at the time more concentrated in New York City than on West 42nd Street, which by that year boasted dozens of thriving nightclubs. The day after Volstead, these became "speakeasies," establishments that no longer bothered with quality control, cleanliness, overcrowding, or curfews. By the time Walker was elected mayor, 32,000 speakeasies were operating throughout the city. Entirely in keeping with his political style of governing, he happily looked the other way at the city's booming, if illegal, bootlegging industry. While still a state senator he had helped pass legislation that legalized Sunday post-church entertainment, including baseball, boxing, and moviegoing, which forever endeared him to a working class grateful for anything that helped bring relief to their six-day, sixty-hour workweek, who in turn elected him mayor.

http://www.newyorkhistory.info/42nd-Street/jimmywalker.html

Great site!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
38. "Non-profit"...ha!
With today's Republicans, there always has to be something in it for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thom Little Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-01-06 05:52 AM
Response to Original message
40. The DeLay-Abramoff Money Trail
The U.S. Family Network, a public advocacy group that operated in the 1990s with close ties to Rep. Tom DeLay and claimed to be a nationwide grass-roots organization, was funded almost entirely by corporations linked to embattled lobbyist Jack Abramoff, according to tax records and former associates of the group.

During its five-year existence, the U.S. Family Network raised $2.5 million but kept its donor list secret. The list, obtained by The Washington Post, shows that $1 million of its revenue came in a single 1998 check from a now-defunct London law firm whose former partners would not identify the money's origins.

.......

In addition to the million-dollar payment involving the London law firm, for example, half a million dollars was donated to the U.S. Family Network by the owners of textile companies in the Mariana Islands in the Pacific, according to the tax records. The textile owners -- with Abramoff's help -- solicited and received DeLay's public commitment to block legislation that would boost their labor costs, according to Abramoff associates, one of the owners and a DeLay speech in 1997.

A quarter of a million dollars was donated over two years by the Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians, Abramoff's largest lobbying client, which counted DeLay as an ally in fighting legislation allowing the taxation of its gambling revenue.



(More damning stuff at the link, much more than I'm allowed to copy and paste here)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/30/AR2005123001480.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-01-06 05:52 AM
Response to Reply #40
41. Where The Money Came From & Went
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EST Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-01-06 05:52 AM
Response to Reply #40
42. This darling quote, appearing at the very end has to be the
biggest laff-a-lot and has to be the author's zinger of the week-cool.

"Anytime you hire your child or spouse, it raises questions as to whether this is a throwback to the time when people used campaigns and government jobs to enrich their families," said Larry Noble, executive director of the Center for Responsive Politics, a nonpartisan watchdog group, and a former general counsel of the FEC.
:rofl: :rofl: :nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-01-06 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #42
47. Suckling the teat of the great money sow
Edited on Sun Jan-01-06 02:50 PM by formercia
DeLay's Law: leave no teat unsuckled.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-01-06 05:52 AM
Response to Reply #40
43. i hope the truth keeps pouring out about this mess
and they all pay with their jobs!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paineinthearse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-01-06 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
45. "$1 million -- a sum not prohibited by law but extraordinary for a small"
Edited on Sun Jan-01-06 10:45 AM by paineinthearse
Is this true? Foreign contributions to PAC's is leagal?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-01-06 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #45
46. The difference between a charitable organization and a PAC
Edited on Sun Jan-01-06 02:42 PM by formercia
charitable organizations give money to people in need or use funds for the benefit of the same. PACs give money to people who already have money of their own but prefer using the money of others for political ends.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-01-06 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
53. note this particular Hamper scam has a lot to do with oil profiteers
Edited on Sun Jan-01-06 03:49 PM by wordpix2
No wonder Bush says DeLay is "innocent." I wouldn't doubt that he and The Dick are hip deep in the muck of this story.

<snip> Nevskaya said in the e-mail yesterday, however, that "neither Naftasib nor the principals you mentioned have ever been represented by a London law firm that you name as James & Sarch Co." She also said that Naftasib and its principals did not pay $1 million to the firm, and denied knowing about the transaction.

Two former Buckham associates said that he told them years ago not only that the $1 million donation was solicited from Russian oil and gas executives, but also that the initial plan was for the donation to be made via a delivery of cash to be picked up at a Washington area airport.

One of the former associates, a Frederick, Md., pastor named Christopher Geeslin who served as the U.S. Family Network's director or president from 1998 to 2001, said Buckham further told him in 1999 that the payment was meant to influence DeLay's vote in 1998 on legislation that helped make it possible for the IMF to bail out the faltering Russian economy and the wealthy investors there.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
txaslftist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-03-06 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
55. I would have f*cked him anyway, claims accused whore, Delay...
The former president of the U.S. Family Network said Buckham told him that Russians contributed $1 million to the group in 1998 specifically to influence DeLay's vote on legislation the International Monetary Fund needed to finance a bailout of the collapsing Russian economy.


A spokesman for DeLay, who is fighting in a Texas state court unrelated charges of illegal fundraising, denied that the contributions influenced the former House majority leader's political activities. The Russian energy executives who worked with Abramoff denied yesterday knowing anything about the million-dollar London transaction described in tax documents...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-03-06 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
56. Lock them up...
...throw away the key.

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 12:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC