Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Former Idaho Republican chair takes libel case to state supreme court

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-30-05 05:30 AM
Original message
Former Idaho Republican chair takes libel case to state supreme court
Former Idaho Republican chair takes libel case to state supreme court

12:22 PM MST on Thursday, December 29, 2005
Associated Press

COEUR D'ALENE -- A former Idaho Republican Party chairman who sued a Spokane, Washington, newspaper for libel is taking his case to the Idaho Supreme Court.

Trent Clark has alleged that he was misquoted in a Spokesman-Review story in 2001.Clark claims he never said, "You probably cannot find an African American male on the street in Washington, D.C. that hasn't been arrested or convicted of a crime."

He says he really said, "I know of no African American males in Washington D.C. who don't have at least a couple of friends who have been arrested or convicted of a felony."

But so far, 1st District Court Judges Eugene Marano and Charles Hosack have thrown out Clark's claim, saying there was no evidence of malice and that the two statements amount to essentially the same thing.
(snip/)

http://www.ktvb.com/news/localnews/stories/ktvbn-dec2905-libel_case.26397a3b.html

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


Idiot Republicans never give up. Here's a story from November:
Ex-Idaho GOP leader's libel lawsuit dismissed
Decision of lower court upheld, but judge cites different reason
Taryn Brodwater
Staff writer
November 16, 2005

A libel lawsuit against The Spokesman-Review by the former chairman of Idaho's Republican Party has been dismissed.

Trent Clark filed the lawsuit against the paper in 2003, alleging that reporter Thomas Clouse misquoted him in a Feb. 2, 2001, article.

Tuesday's ruling by 1st District Judge Charles Hosack upheld a Magistrate Court decision that granted summary judgment in the newspaper's favor. Hosack, though, dismissed the suit on different grounds than 1st District Judge Eugene Marano.
(snip)

Marano had dismissed Clark's claim on the grounds that there was no evidence of malice on the newspaper's behalf. On appeal, Hosack found that the case should be dismissed because "the gist of the written quote and the gist of the alleged actual statement is substantially the same."

Clark could not be reached for comment at his Soda Springs, Idaho, home on Tuesday afternoon.

Newspaper attorney Duane Swinton said the paper was pleased "that two different judges for different reasons have dismissed the case."
(snip/...)
http://64.233.161.104/search?q=cache:EU0l4UwVpwIJ:www.spokesmanreview.com/idaho/story.asp%3FID%3D101554+%22Trent+Clark%22+%2B+Spokane&hl=en


He's mentioned at this site as a lobbyist for Monsanto:
http://www.publicintegrity.org/lobby/profile-pf.aspx?act=agencies&year=2003&ag=018



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Surya Gayatri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-30-05 06:03 AM
Response to Original message
1. The more rotten and corrupt
Edited on Fri Dec-30-05 06:08 AM by Surya Gayatri
they are, the more they will fight to exonerate themselves. Look for Delay to follow a similar path in his legal battles. Once these crooks have tasted the spoils of power, they are indefatigable in their attempts to grab it back. Look at their long road to absolute power since the Conservative debacle in 1964--it's taken them 40 long years, but how their dogged, single-minded perseverance has paid off! SG

Edited for spelling...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blueknight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-30-05 07:16 AM
Response to Original message
2. is it just me....
or does it seem like all neo-cons have the same look?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anotherdrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-30-05 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. yep
and it's just begging to be wiped off their faces
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anotherdrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-30-05 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
3. what an ass
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-30-05 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
5. You know what's funny?
The quotes themselves (either the exact or inexact one) wouldn't be enough for me to flag him as a racist.

Now, his lawsuit-happy reaction triggers my spider-sense. I say racist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 12:40 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. They should, here's why
At least the second one. Because "I know of NO MALE (or female) who doesn't have at least a couple of friends who have been arrested or convicted of a felony." Between distant relatives, school buddies, co-workers, neighbors; everybody knows somebody who has been arrested for something serious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-30-05 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
6. How dare you expose me for what I am!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
banana republican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-30-05 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
7. OMFG A Repuke attacking a Repuke Newspaper....
will miracles never cease.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-30-05 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
8. A priceless distinction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superconnected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-30-05 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
9. I could say the same about Republican politicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagickMuffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 02:58 AM
Response to Original message
11. Is this another one of those Frivolous Lawsuits?
Seems to me this is exactly what they would consider a waste of the court system.

What a putz!

putz n 1: (Yiddish) a fool; an idiot 2: obscene terms for penis

Who knew that a putz was an obscene term for penis? How fitting!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LincolnMcGrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 03:44 AM
Response to Original message
12. I said they was all Coons, Not Spear Chuckers!!
:eyes:

I hope this case gets all they press it truly deserves. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC