Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Santorum now critical of Dover case

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 09:11 AM
Original message
Santorum now critical of Dover case
Posted on Thu, Dec. 22, 2005

Santorum now critical of Dover case
He denies he is contradicting earlier statements of support for the cause.
By Carrie Budoff and Paul Nussbaum
Inquirer Staff Writers

Early this year, Sen. Rick Santorum commended the Dover Area School District for "attempting to teach the controversy of evolution."

But one day after a federal judge ruled that the district's policy on intelligent design was unconstitutional, Santorum said he was troubled by court testimony that showed some board members were motivated by religion in adopting the policy.

And, he said in an interview, he disagreed with the board for mandating the teaching of intelligent design, rather than just the controversy surrounding evolution.

Santorum - who sits on the advisory board of the Thomas More Law Center, which defended the school board in court - said the case offered "a bad set of facts" to test the concept that theories other than evolution should be taught in science classrooms.

more
http://www.philly.com/mld/inquirer/news/local/states/pennsylvania/13461220.htm



Obviously, he's up for election.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
1. (sing) Santorum, my friend, is blowin' in the wind....
I'm shocked! Shocked, I tell you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Santorum seems synonymous
with spineless.

What a weasel !!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
3. "a bad set of facts"??? Maybe because there are no "good facts" to
support ID....?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. You are right, because inherently the ID is an attempt to push religion.
The "bad set of facts" he sites are that the school board lied about their motive, which was really to push religion on children by disguising it as a "scientific theory."

The problem is that there are no good set of facts because getting religion into public schools IS the goal. They must disguise it to avoid the pesky Constitution. So, either they tell the truth, thereby guaranteeing a loss on constitutional grounds, or lie and create a "bad set of facts."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Correct
See my analysis below. It is in the same vin. You've summarized it much more nicely, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rkc3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
4. I love Republicans:
From the article - "His 2002 op-ed dealt with academic freedom and argued that dissenting theories to evolution shouldn't be repressed. He said he meant that teachers should have the flexibility - but not be required - to mention intelligent design as part of the evolution debate, a position he continues to hold."

Rick would have us believe that diseenting opinions are important to, perhaps, create critical thinking skills. I wonder if Rick would disagree with the Bush administration over herding dissenters behind fencing so his king would not be subjected to a dissenting opinion while giving a speech.

I wonder how Rick would feel if we offered up teaching students about safe sex - as a corollary and dissenting opinion to abstinence in the classroom. My guess is that he wouldn't be as open to that theory.

After all, he's a douche bag.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
6. It was a remarkably bad set of facts for the Intelligent Design movement
Why they hitched their wagon to the lunatics on the Dover School Board is a mystery to me. probably just fundamentalist hubris.

The school board members were religious fanatics. As testimony demonstrated, many of the more pliant members didn't even know the basic arguments of intelligent design, and at least one repeatedly misstated the name (as "intelligence design") in court! They voted for a "scientific alternative theory" (assuming their definitions) without being in the least bit briefed on the science. (Needless to say, the supposed science, which rests on the concept of "irreducible complexity," is itself wrong). They made outrageous statements that were out-and-out creationist and took secret donations from a fundamentalist church that were then laundered through a school board members father in order to hide their source. They were a pack of liars.

Their main problem was this: they intended the challenge to evolution for religious reasons, but then had to mask that when they saw that the case law was overwhelmingly against them. So, they ended up with incoherent and contradictory positions, since they were constantly having to both defend and renounce their religious motivations. Interestingly enough, Santorum is in the same position!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Good point about Santorum
He is in the same position. Hence his shifting stances. His foundation (which is the foundation of ID) is quicksand because the truth (that they are attempting to get religion in public schools) is thinly veiled. It is hard to stand up in quicksand. Happy sinking Santorum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ananda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
8. whish
Whish way is the wind blowing now, Sanctorum? lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
10. wind direction changed
Edited on Thu Dec-22-05 09:46 AM by radfringe
moderate to sever gusts have toppled some of his Polls numbers

just call him a whirly-gig....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
11. Two strikes and Ricky is trying to foul off the third strike......
First the Dover voters clean sweep the school board fundies
Second the judge smacks down the ID malarky and exposes it for the creationist nonsense that it is.


Third.....voters sweep out a fundy senator. Heh.

And wasn't the Thomas More Law Center one of the groups the judge called a liar for Jesus?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleedingheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
12. He has been smearing himself around the local cable channels
he is vying for every photo opportunity to get his image more polished and likable for the upcoming year...

We need to be very wary of this....he is a worm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kay1864 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
13. LIAR LIAR LIAR
He *endorsed* the decision--his puff-piece appears in the Dover Biology newsletter, the one that announced the ID decision in early 2005!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
14. There's much more than an election at stake in this
The ID group, following this scathing ruling, needs a new avenue of attack. Please note: "...he disagreed with the board for mandating the teaching of intelligent design, rather than just the controversy surrounding evolution."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohtransplant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
15. Election Year Ricky
is much more moderate that the real thing. He helped save Social Security you know.:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueInPhilly Donating Member (341 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Santorum BEGONE!!!
11 more months...
11 more months...
11 more months...

:party:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohtransplant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. I wish I still lived in PA
just so I could vote against this bastard.

Since I can't I just send $$$ to Casey.

Please don't let him buy another election and scare people into voting for him.

Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
18. Heh heh, you said "Santorum", heh heh. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 07:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC